500+ entries in 0.312s
mp_en_viaje: asciilifeform, i expect she's just comparing to
blockchain.info or w/e other webwallet
a111: Logged on 2019-04-02 11:03 spyked: noob question re bitcoin: is there an expected time for tx propagation to peers' mempools? details: I'm running a fully synced trb node, connected to trusted republican nodes using -addnode. I've sent 2 txen using sendtoaddress ~3hrs ago and none of them are on e.g.
blockchain.info so far
spyked: noob question re bitcoin: is there an expected time for tx propagation to peers' mempools? details: I'm running a fully synced trb node, connected to trusted republican nodes using -addnode. I've sent 2 txen using sendtoaddress ~3hrs ago and none of them are on e.g.
blockchain.info so far
☟︎ mircea_popescu: Mocky so flush them via whatever, iirc
blockchain.info sent correct ammt.
BingoBoingo: asciilifeform: These are
blockchain.info style things where they market "all the crypto happens in your browser window"
ben_vulpes: wowee, when i reload
blockchain.info first it shows one number for how long a block's been advertised and then shortly thereafter, another number indicating they've known about it for longer than they said at first!
ben_vulpes: and eyy, just caught a block before
blockchain.info shinohai:
blockchain.info on the phork: "To ensure they remain safe while the network is in transition, we will temporarily suspend bitcoin send, request, buy, sell, and exchange functionality roughly 12 to 24 hours before the time of the fork until the network stabilizes. "
mircea_popescu: and in other lulz, loads of larger ops (including
blockchain.info) are actually behind the chain tip now
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform see, coinbase. bitpay /
blockchain.info dun stand a chance.
shinohai: Oh ffs .... "
blockchain.info to support Ether"
a111: Logged on 2017-07-14 16:47 mircea_popescu: aaand trinque, incidentally, as it just occured to me -- can you get deedbot payments online by the end of the month ? seems somewhat likely usg is gonna turn off its "webwallet" bullshits from
blockchain.info down.
shinohai: All signs point to this ....
blockchain.info is added as DNS seed for segwit2x in recent commits on shithub
a111: Logged on 2017-07-14 16:47 mircea_popescu: aaand trinque, incidentally, as it just occured to me -- can you get deedbot payments online by the end of the month ? seems somewhat likely usg is gonna turn off its "webwallet" bullshits from
blockchain.info down.
mircea_popescu: aaand trinque, incidentally, as it just occured to me -- can you get deedbot payments online by the end of the month ? seems somewhat likely usg is gonna turn off its "webwallet" bullshits from
blockchain.info down.
☟︎☟︎ mircea_popescu: (for bonus lulz, compare and contrast with the rogerzus ver blowing up the cover of
blockchain.info to try and recoup a half bitcoin or some shit. bassically contemporaneous events, and yet at least headcount reddit still thought ver actually has anything to do with bitcoin.)
shinohai: They are like
blockchain.info where the most important "upgrades" are cute animations to the UI
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform i don't really do
blockchain.info style "public support". i think i have the stuff somewhere, i'll have to dig for it. basically it's, blk* live on /sda ; blkindex.dat and friends live on /sdb which happens to be a ramdisk.
a111: Logged on 2016-12-09 22:55 ben_vulpes:
blockchain.info falling behind?
mircea_popescu: the poor situation of the shambling abomination is the deep reason for repeated humiliations delivered recently to
blockchain.info for instance.
hanbot: test tx via trb using sendtoaddress fails to send diddly squat, meanwhile @
blockchain.info: transaction rejected by our node. Reason:Script resulted in a non-true stack: []
shinohai: weird thing is I see mimi ahead of
blockchain.info lots of times
mircea_popescu: don't tell me he had a dispute over who's paying for the two slices of pizza with some other captain of industry and ended up going into the
blockchain.info admin interface all over again
mircea_popescu:
http://btcbase.org/log/2017-01-12#1601941 << this is a useful record in that one can take the list of mimisbrunnr , which exists timestampted in chan, and compare to list of
blockchain.info for instance, see what dt is involved. sum it up over 10k blocks or whatever
☝︎ shinohai:
blockchain.info website only shows 442709 to me xD
thestringpuller: UK "banned" end to end encryption with Investigory Powers Act of 2016. I think it basically says companies in UK have to put back doors in their shit or they are "non-compliant", thus making end-2-end encryption illegal. Effects
Blockchain.info users (who operates in UK). Takes effect 2017...
a111: Logged on 2016-11-20 05:10 pete_dushenski: re: diff jump, largest pool now down to 18%, 2nd place at 17% according to
https://blockchain.info/pools. top two pools had ~50% just six months ago when famous bbet tx was 'lost'. competition is heating up within the not-so-monolithic chinese cartel. nothing divides and conquers like btc y'know.
pete_dushenski: re: diff jump, largest pool now down to 18%, 2nd place at 17% according to
https://blockchain.info/pools. top two pools had ~50% just six months ago when famous bbet tx was 'lost'. competition is heating up within the not-so-monolithic chinese cartel. nothing divides and conquers like btc y'know.
☟︎ mircea_popescu:
Blockchain.info is blaming their recent downtime on a DNS attack against their registrar. << that part is correct ; mitm tried and mostly failed.
mircea_popescu: shinohai so it'd be practical for something like that, you know, all blockchain in memory. no disk seeks, faster. if you run something like
blockchain.info (though i doubt they hold it all in ram)
shinohai: Neither show up on the
blockchain.info turd
shinohai: has anyone checked the rng for the new
blockchain.info `wallet`
mircea_popescu: someone shjould ask him what ever happened to those 10 btc he broke
blockchain.info to trace
nubbins`: asciilifeform feel free to verify on your own node;
blockchain.info may be incorrect
dooglus: they also think kB is spelled with a capital K. whenever
blockchain.info disagrees with another block explorer, it's wrong
BingoBoingo: * mircea_popescu recalls the lulzier years in 2011-2012 back when roger ver was actually pretending to be like, a business man, and stuff. << NEver forget $50
Blockchain.info chargeback because Ver's sticky hands were in all the things then
assbot: Logged on 12-01-2016 22:24:10; punkman: the main chain of blockhain.info. can be problematic if
blockchain.info starts displaying both 1mb and >1mb chains concurrently
punkman: the main chain of blockhain.info. can be problematic if
blockchain.info starts displaying both 1mb and >1mb chains concurrently
☟︎ kakobrekla: seems like
blockchain.info resolves that bet
jurov:
blockchain.info and blockexplorer.com know nothing of d8e60a0979024cce9159bd7b59594eae7dec627db5ac6bd088866afea533b0e9
BingoBoingo:
Blockchain.info integrated that one from bitinstant at one point
mircea_popescu: point remains : as far as bitcoin is concerned, the thing is as irrelevant as the messages
blockchain.info keeps "tagging" transactions with. the people who have no business in bitcoin but for whatever emotional/psychogenic reasons are misrepresented or misrepresenting themselves as involved WILL necessarily find a way out. there's just no way to stay attached if you;'re not attached.