180 entries in 0.75s
ossabot: Logged on 2019-10-08 17:45:48 asciilifeform: lobbes: speaking strictly for self -- 'quick' jobs are quick because they (incl. '
fit problem in
head' phase) can be
fit into a single slot in b/w salt mine idjicies. whereas things large enuff as not
fit, much moar friction. (erry time must load it in... again, again, ... )
snsabot: Logged on 2019-09-25 21:52:01 mircea_popescu: for this reason any imanentization (ie, mapping of concepts into reality) will revolve around a "paradigm" / wilful blindness of some kind. "how could i not think of that" is always lulzy -- if you thought of everything your
head would explode. and that's a literalism : if you somehow
fit all states of its own emptiness into a glass it'd go boom.
snsabot: Logged on 2019-09-25 21:52:01 mircea_popescu: for this reason any imanentization (ie, mapping of concepts into reality) will revolve around a "paradigm" / wilful blindness of some kind. "how could i not think of that" is always lulzy -- if you thought of everything your
head would explode. and that's a literalism : if you somehow
fit all states of its own emptiness into a glass it'd go boom.
mircea_popescu: for this reason any imanentization (ie, mapping of concepts into reality) will revolve around a "paradigm" / wilful blindness of some kind. "how could i not think of that" is always lulzy -- if you thought of everything your
head would explode. and that's a literalism : if you somehow
fit all states of its own emptiness into a glass it'd go boom.
mp_en_viaje: to put it in other terms -- if this
fit in
head, it'd be broken. the ~mechanism~ is supposed to be
fit in
head ; not the data.
lobbes_field: I.e. If, say, spyked writes a better cl-www-tron I'd still want to be able to
fit the thing in my
head. So any work I do toward 'building my own' will only aid me in that task (hence relatedly, I suppose, why 'build yer own v-tron' is a commonly recommended exercise).
bvt: it's just that if components
fit in
head, imo alpha/beta does not apply
billymg: to describe my overall thinking/strategy with mp-wp, i would like to 1) rip out everything not absolutely necessary for the basic functions of blogging/moderating 2) after arriving at the bare minimum,
fit what's left in my
head to then evaluate ways to simplify/improve/rewrite
a111: Logged on 2019-03-13 15:22 mircea_popescu: asciilifeform dood was quite unsophisticated, had this very... well, fundamentally a peasant's worldview, deeply optimistic and over-inclined to
fit-in-
head.
BingoBoingo: <mircea_popescu> asciilifeform dood was quite unsophisticated, had this very... well, fundamentally a peasant's worldview, deeply optimistic and over-inclined to
fit-in-
head. << Well... "Dallas"
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform dood was quite unsophisticated, had this very... well, fundamentally a peasant's worldview, deeply optimistic and over-inclined to
fit-in-
head.
☟︎ mod6: Maybe we're talking past eachother a bit here. Anyway, I don't know much about these things. I'm kinda learning bit by bit as I go... it all certainly doesn't "
fit in
head" or whatever yet.
mircea_popescu: i'd like a purpose made item,
fit in
head as such, can keep for later.
mircea_popescu: machine bitness has everything to do with it -- 16 bit machine only accesses memory you can
fit in
head.
mircea_popescu: there's no rule they're short enough you'd consider them
fit in
head.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform the discussion spawned from me going "wtf is the POINT of even counting to 255, nobody can
fit such in
head" that then merged into "how do you know ?" which resulted in the predictable "i wonder how the fuck does ~he~ know"
mircea_popescu: ie, we're straight back to a
http://btcbase.org/log/2018-12-01#1877543 : when it comes to flight, the strategy must include separating the egg laying part out of the airplane. whereas when it comes to
fit-in-
head or what have you, elegance, self-containedness, the egg laying part must be included in the airplane.
☝︎ a111: Logged on 2018-12-05 06:32 ben_vulpes:
http://btcbase.org/log/2018-12-04#1878282 << still quite a bit of value in sqlthings in managing fungible programmers. in the same way that common lisp fails at making cogs, mmmapped custom $whatever can be marvelously conservative of time and space,
fit entirely in
head, and also be anti-cog.
ben_vulpes:
http://btcbase.org/log/2018-12-04#1878282 << still quite a bit of value in sqlthings in managing fungible programmers. in the same way that common lisp fails at making cogs, mmmapped custom $whatever can be marvelously conservative of time and space,
fit entirely in
head, and also be anti-cog.
☝︎☟︎ mircea_popescu: asciilifeform and for the puyrpose of
fit in
head, do you agree 2.4k pics with margins better than 600mb flatpile ?
zx2c4: Well of course everyone prefers simpler proofs that
fit in the
head mircea_popescu: we ~needed~ a republican crc32 anyway, it's useful and important, chapter
head exactly like "we need a hash" or "we need a ffa", and i was aware extant code is not
fit for pitching.
ave1: spyked, nice implementation, so far the lispm code seems to
fit in my
head!
mircea_popescu: no agreement is sought. not like we're packing a cinematic capsule for mars and can only
fit one removed
head.
mircea_popescu: hanbot, hey, that's what a good variety speak is for,
fit more in
head.
mircea_popescu: usg trying to leverage the fact that idiots stick together whereas intelligent people jwz, into this situation where they keep shitting turds larger than what you can
fit in
head and so "one man's guess is as good as any other's" and "we don't actually know it's a scam" hurr durr.
apeloyee: i also need to understand/
fit in
head/convince myself of the line re "extends to any N bit register". << schoolbook addition method shows that the MSB and carry-out depend only on MSB of operands and the carry-in to the most significant place; the carry-in can be derived from result's MSB and the summand's (as their sum modulo 2, aka xor), thus the register width doesn't matter
a111: Logged on 2017-12-05 21:32 apeloyee: I'm still curious what gcd there will be. I admit defeat regarding the binary GCD I posted earlier - after trying to make an extended GCD out of it, it ballooned to 100+ LOC, and it doesn't work. Meaning it doesn't
fit in
head... (BTW the orginal code snipped I posted has a mux which always picks wrong input)
apeloyee: I'm still curious what gcd there will be. I admit defeat regarding the binary GCD I posted earlier - after trying to make an extended GCD out of it, it ballooned to 100+ LOC, and it doesn't work. Meaning it doesn't
fit in
head... (BTW the orginal code snipped I posted has a mux which always picks wrong input)
☟︎ ben_vulpes: i also need to understand/
fit in
head/convince myself of the line re "extends to any N bit register".
ben_vulpes: i will admit to still attempting to
fit in
head the deduction of carry and borrow algo
mircea_popescu: digital particuarly good
fit too, because usual problem with mirrors is "your
head won't
fit in F". but a ccd will.
mircea_popescu: this new item is to my eyes fundamental pillar of "
fit in
head", because a thoroughly well understood mechanism can then be relegated to background and built upon.
a111: Logged on 2017-08-31 05:15 ben_vulpes: "oh dear, i really need some help here. this javascript app is so completely asynchronous that i can't hold it all in my
head at the same time." "didja design it to
fit in your
head?" "no, i didn't really have time for that." "didja...write tests for it?" "no, definitely didn't have time for that" "well, it looks like you're going to have to find the time to painfully debug it by hand without any of the
ben_vulpes: "oh dear, i really need some help here. this javascript app is so completely asynchronous that i can't hold it all in my
head at the same time." "didja design it to
fit in your
head?" "no, i didn't really have time for that." "didja...write tests for it?" "no, definitely didn't have time for that" "well, it looks like you're going to have to find the time to painfully debug it by hand without any of the
☟︎ trinque: asciilifeform: it is because of the size of your
head that the problem must
fit in it, neh?
a111: Logged on 2017-07-18 22:41 mircea_popescu: for instance : alf gets so livid when certain classes of events occur because they contradict assumptions he's made upon which he built the particular
head-fitter he uses. they'd better hold, or else the whole thing is in danger. specifically : a lot less could be
fit in
head.
mircea_popescu: for instance : alf gets so livid when certain classes of events occur because they contradict assumptions he's made upon which he built the particular
head-fitter he uses. they'd better hold, or else the whole thing is in danger. specifically : a lot less could be
fit in
head.
☟︎ whaack: i'm not advocating one doesn't make an effort to learn, I'm just pointing out that the material covered does not "
fit in
head" (as alf puts it) very easily and thus the main thing gotten from that book, for me at least, is the deep complexity involved with some of these schemes
a111: Logged on 2017-06-20 14:43 mircea_popescu: sn0wmonster you're not here to learn. you're here to try and bludgeon the world into a shape your
head may
fit. this is the opposite of learning. learning is when you change.
a111: Logged on 2017-07-07 15:03 mircea_popescu: this pretty much sits at the core of the whole dispute. by "
fit in
head" tmsr simply means "do not engage irrelevant complicacy". complicacy serves as a term of art here, to denote things that are constructively complicated, as opposed to the naturally complicated. what your woman means when she speaks is complicated ; but marriage is complicacy.
mircea_popescu: this pretty much sits at the core of the whole dispute. by "
fit in
head" tmsr simply means "do not engage irrelevant complicacy". complicacy serves as a term of art here, to denote things that are constructively complicated, as opposed to the naturally complicated. what your woman means when she speaks is complicated ; but marriage is complicacy.
☟︎ mircea_popescu: sn0wmonster you're not here to learn. you're here to try and bludgeon the world into a shape your
head may
fit. this is the opposite of learning. learning is when you change.
☟︎ erlehmann: system does not
fit in
head as easily
Framedragger: code can't scroll horizontally, breaks too many things. e.g. visual selection of blocks. needs to literally-
fit-in-
head horizontal-wise
mod6: and that's the main thing. i really care about trying to
fit it in
head, as opposed to "compiler" concerns at this time with ffa. however, my other little sample shits i've been trying to make are probably going to go a lot better now that i have a 'sane' environment.
mircea_popescu: the whole "don't fuck up or i'll beat you" mechanism exists ~specifically because~ the whole array doesn;t
fit in my (or anyone's)
head.
mircea_popescu:
http://btcbase.org/log/2017-04-28#1649528 << it is avoidable as a matter of fact. i have by now built an item that is too complex to
fit in my
head. i call it $harem for convenience, but it's a set of girls who do things on the basis of rules which they were at some point in their girly youth illo tempore been beaten / screamed at for.
☝︎ a111: Logged on 2017-04-28 21:14 asciilifeform: the cost of using an item that does not
fit in
head, is essentially the cognitive equivalent of curl liquishit | bash .
mircea_popescu: i will say, people tend to be amazed at what can
fit in a
head once proper trees are constructed for the fitting.
phf: asciilifeform: you introduce gcc, userland, etc. in the mix already. so either the whole system must
fit in
head, or else it's not an important prereq for you
mircea_popescu: there is no good solution to this problem, but small codebases aka
fit-in-
head is a very strong paleative, and to my mind its chief merit comes from just this.
trinque: one moment "nobody can
fit c machine in
head" and the next "anyone can c puny human!1!1!!"
mircea_popescu: this being the difference between a technology company like apple and a media company like yahoo, aka microsoft : the former actually
fit gcc / their erstwhile competition in
head. the latter just blather on in the hopes the holy paper clip will help with the printing press.
mircea_popescu: this is the very important point here - every feature in the toolchain makes programming easier but ~everything else~ (generally here referred to "
fit in
head" but easily expanded to writing correct tests, maintaining, even KNOWING WHAT BLEW UP when something blows up!) much much harder