mircea_popescu: well, 10 day futures at 10% is terrible in and of itself.
mircea_popescu: iirc the confederate republic scored this low after lee surrended and not at any point before
davout: trade volume seems pretty low on all these ~100 btc/24h
davout: buttfinex also has such a market with roughly the same volume figures
davout: "This means that currently no funds can be moved out of the multi-sig wallets."
davout: who knows, maybe that leads to an "Ethereum Classic 2"
davout: or maybe they'll grow used to having Ctrl+Z as a thing
shinohai: Shit has more rollbacks than Walmart as it is.
davout: according to unverified hearsay it seems that ~1% of the total mEth supply got accidentally'd
mircea_popescu: it's important to be creative in any case. they can produce more eth at any time, but the experience was valuable.
shinohai: "How to fail and make people liek it - By Vitalik Butterin"
shinohai: You may remember Vitalik from other great books such as "How to run a quantum computing scam to raise capital for a crypto scam" and "Dress like a furfag and cook your own meth!"
mircea_popescu: heh. i think quantum computing was abandoned because it was discovered it leaked CFC gasses which are bad for the ozone layer
a111: Logged on 2017-10-17 05:59 jurov: "The flaw resides in the Infineon-developed RSA Library version v1.02.013, specifically within an algorithm it implements for RSA primes generation. "
a111: Logged on 2017-10-07 21:48 apeloyee:
http://btcbase.org/log/2017-10-05#1721485 << alternatively, can *construct* numbers which don't have very small factors. pick a nonzero remainder mod 2, mod 3, ... mod largest-prime-fit-in-your-primorial and find what number of primorial is congruent to it using chinese remainder theorem
☟︎☟︎ apeloyee: I must say that I dont understand how "exponent 131074 reduces to exponent 2 somehow", and what CRT has to do with it
☟︎ apeloyee: they calculated powers of 65537 modulo some primorial
a111: Logged on 2017-11-07 14:34 a111: Logged on 2017-10-07 21:48 apeloyee:
http://btcbase.org/log/2017-10-05#1721485 << alternatively, can *construct* numbers which don't have very small factors. pick a nonzero remainder mod 2, mod 3, ... mod largest-prime-fit-in-your-primorial and find what number of primorial is congruent to it using chinese remainder theorem
a111: Logged on 2017-11-07 14:34 a111: Logged on 2017-10-07 21:48 apeloyee:
http://btcbase.org/log/2017-10-05#1721485 << alternatively, can *construct* numbers which don't have very small factors. pick a nonzero remainder mod 2, mod 3, ... mod largest-prime-fit-in-your-primorial and find what number of primorial is congruent to it using chinese remainder theorem
apeloyee: perharps running rabin-miller "amplifies small/temporary imperfections in the rng, into fatal"
apeloyee: at that point might as well give up
apeloyee: can't. I was sarcastic, because I don't see how CRT construction can amplify, assuming not obviously broken/backdoored RNG. why won't long-range correlations kill mthe "pick random prime" method as well?
apeloyee: "pick random" is obviously not this
apeloyee: plox to qualify. you want a method to generate Nth prime, but accept the "pick random number until prime" , despite in not being the Nth prime generator, but no other methods?
apeloyee: aha, so you're ok with the method produces junk, so long as the primes in range are equidistributed?
apeloyee: "pick random" will usually yield a composite, which must then be filtered out.
apeloyee: how many bits/s does your generator yield?
a111: Logged on 2017-08-30 15:53 asciilifeform: 13:08 < kanzure> she wants to control the access in her own way
a111: Logged on 2017-10-07 21:48 apeloyee:
http://btcbase.org/log/2017-10-05#1721485 << alternatively, can *construct* numbers which don't have very small factors. pick a nonzero remainder mod 2, mod 3, ... mod largest-prime-fit-in-your-primorial and find what number of primorial is congruent to it using chinese remainder theorem
a111: Logged on 2017-11-07 16:39 asciilifeform: i believe in the arithmetic, yes. but how to show that the two conditions i stated, hold ?
apeloyee: ...then, by the CRT, there exists a bijection between all numbers in range [0, primorial-1] not divisible by any primes in the primorial, and the tuples of nonzero remainders from division by the primes. "numbers in range [0, primorial-1] not divisible by any primes in the primorial", obviously, includes all primes in said range (except those in the primorial). if the remainders mod 2, 3,...
apeloyee: ......p_n are independent and uniformly distributed, then the probability of tuple of these being chosen is the same (by definition of independence), and because CRT gives a bijection, all outputs are equally likely. did I repeat myself enough?
☟︎ a111: Logged on 2017-11-07 17:16 asciilifeform: imho this is an idiocy that perma-discredits everyone even tangentially involved.
apeloyee: how does it make bank from the captcha ? << it's just a proof of work. it's not unknown for sci-hub to ban etire countries also.
apeloyee: It's a method to generate a muber not divisible by small primes. Might be still divisible by large ones.
apeloyee: I still haven't heard how it will get you nailed.
apeloyee: do miller-rabin on the results.
apeloyee: quit flipping from one opinion to another every few days
a111: Logged on 2017-10-05 19:38 asciilifeform: for the initial sieve ~prior~ to miller-rabin
a111: Logged on 2017-10-05 19:40 asciilifeform: trial division is dog slow vs gcd.
apeloyee: in fact, using evil, heretical software, calculated that this tries ~6.5 times less candidates for ~2048-bit primes compared to the pick-random-odd-number
apeloyee: well, is CRT nonwell, of cource I can't clain that CRT is obvious. But I think you're just allergic to it
a111: Logged on 2017-11-04 18:37 asciilifeform: for same reason you an' i, have 2 eyes
apeloyee: but you claimed "just 2", and not 3, 4...
apeloyee: i could understand if having 2,3, 4,... transmitters progressively lowering the detection chance
apeloyee: but "1 transmitter is visible, 2 are not" i find hard to believe
apeloyee: didn't you describe a scheme for 1 transmitter? in each time interval, pick many cryptographically pseudo-random orthogonal waveforms, calculate a weighted sum, transmit. the weights encode information. can split into many transmitters in various places.
apeloyee: no reason to only encode the signal in difference then.
apeloyee: Do you have any data as to how distinguishable defective motors are? e.g. it's probably an impulse filtered with a min-phase filter. whereas fake motor probably won't be.
apeloyee: the transmitter disguised as motor
apeloyee: again, I have no data, but I suspect you won't be able to encode much data into it
apeloyee: simpler to just transmit 1W over 30MHz. Or 100mW. etc.
apeloyee: and have your transmitter move, lest it be detected by correlation attacks.
apeloyee: shannon-hartley theorem. max bit per watt is when you sit far below noise floor
apeloyee: 100kW transmit only logarithmically more, but detection easiness in proportional to power
apeloyee: don't pop up above noise floor, because bit-per-chance-of-detection drops off rapidly
apeloyee: and where you get 100kW on a moving object
☟︎ apeloyee: no magical invisibility potions.
apeloyee: can just decrease the chance of detection.
apeloyee: to a reasonable value, but there's probably no escape from "keep moving"
☟︎ apeloyee: e.g.balloon tx'ing can masquerade as thunder
apeloyee: if stands across the street, will detect. forget about it.
apeloyee: srsly you're asking for invis potion.
apeloyee: you have managed thus to transmit how much?
apeloyee: an' if you keep sparking next to detector across the street, you will Have Problems. because have to transmit enough to rsa.
apeloyee: you stipulated detector's across the street. can do direction finding.
apeloyee: but also hard to hear you over all that noise. hence my "there's a fixed number of bits you can transmit before detection, assuming given ratio of intended recipient capabilities to enemy capabilities"
apeloyee: and assuming you stay put of course
apeloyee: move. preferably unpredictably.
apeloyee: why not all of 'em, at 1/N power
apeloyee: the enemy doesn't realistically have resource to stand next to everyone. see bitcoin: can't make rewriting history impossible, lets make it unprofitable.
☟︎ apeloyee: and to detect you, has to stand next ot you during transmission of significant number of bits
apeloyee: be a true вредитель and sabotage the spy device's uplink. they need a phat one.
apeloyee: if the enemy is besieging you and watching you all the time, not much you can do
apeloyee: if you can't even plant a relay somewhere nearby
apeloyee: sieges are generally followed by an assault, unless th3e besieged surrender; to hope otherwise is simply suicide
apeloyee: most of the processing is local << if a known вредитель, that means siege. otherwise they need to exchange ~approx as much data as can be fit in spectrum. obv can't reuse the very same spectrum. hence lasers/sound/cables. can be sabotaged. them low noise receiver must cost quite some $$$.
apeloyee: understand, they can't keep sieges on 10,000 вредителей. will go bankrupt.
apeloyee: an' they have 30000 SDRs to keep the siege? physical objects?
apeloyee: an' operators. robots not yet functional enough.
apeloyee: and you'll know about 'em. antennas.
apeloyee: remember, 1 antenna not enough.
apeloyee: gotta exchange among them all traffic.
apeloyee: or they must send strgraight to enemy
apeloyee: hogging sw spectrum will be a simple way to make new enemy. << can reach a mutially beneficial agreement. the more transmitters, the more channel capacity, until the distortion is above noise.
apeloyee: df for usg for free << correlation attacks work but are neither easy nor cheap. if they only exchange 10% of the traffic, will take 10x as long to find you, unless they know the key
apeloyee: and? understand I claimed that it's possible to find you, not that it's easy or cheap
apeloyee: yes, involves capturing and comparing traffic from multiple points, because each individual bit gives very little confidence
apeloyee: if you miss some time period, got to capture moar.
apeloyee: transmit slowly enough. enemy's cost to proportional to time
apeloyee: 'maximize # of bits that can be sent before you gotta move' << this mostly involves choice of locality. "check if the map matches the locality. If it doesn't - change the locality."(R)(C)
apeloyee: more crackpot ideas: live in flyshitville, can then have ample warning about enemy detection equipment, and plenty of RF emission by and neighbors' equipment to hide behind ( but few neighbors, important for SNR)
a111: Logged on 2017-08-30 20:08 mircea_popescu: and the shower has a pair of buttons : if you increase the hot water debit, this drops pressure for the hot pump, which kicks in, dropping pressure for the main pump, which kicks in. and vice-versa.
apeloyee: more: set up a site, bemoaning "radio intruders" on $band, stream from several nearby radios on it. the recipient can then improve SNR by subtracting whatever interference (from your POV), or estimate atmospheric conditions
apeloyee: re above, at least have a hidden relay in Flyshit Forest
apeloyee: see above re execrable efficiency of classic modes.
apeloyee: if you needed 1W before, add a relay half-way, need 0.25W for you and relay nao. generally private relay should be a lot closer to sender. needless to say relay must re-modulate.
apeloyee: and preferably store-and-forward at opportune atmospheric conditions.
apeloyee: can add a phase offset so that they are in-phase at receiver. N stations, more than N times SNR increase, but opens to attacks based on partial knowledge
apeloyee: no externals plox << opportunistic use is a thing
apeloyee: consider that the enemy will certainly take advantage of your willful ignorance of atmospheric conditions (as known from bbc,etc), as you will up the power
jhvh1: BingoBoingo: Bitstamp BTCUSD last: 7040.87, vol: 13438.87141142 | Bitfinex BTCUSD last: 7027.7, vol: 41358.63189668 | Kraken BTCUSD last: 7049.0, vol: 3292.73922678 | Volume-weighted last average: 7031.95416165
BingoBoingo: <asciilifeform> ( i wouldn't put it past'em to 'technical glitch' and turn off bbc for a few min. to get you to up your wattage, say ) << They do it to comcast
a111: Logged on 2017-07-04 03:09 asciilifeform: in other unsurprises, 'Corrupt data that accidentally flowed out of a NASDAQ systems test caused the share prices...'
BingoBoingo: For a while big mediterranean cables were snipped similarly to likely same effect
a111: Logged on 2017-11-07 16:21 apeloyee: I must say that I dont understand how "exponent 131074 reduces to exponent 2 somehow", and what CRT has to do with it
a111: Logged on 2017-11-07 16:41 asciilifeform: but as i currently understand, my q reduces to 'find The Formula For Primes' (tm)(r), a millenium-long headache for mathematical folx , to this day unsolved.
a111: Logged on 2017-11-07 17:03 asciilifeform: what ought to do instead, is to rngize the bottom Q bits, where Q is log2(estimated prime gap at the current bitness, times severalfold engineering margin)
mircea_popescu: in general so after 16773120 bits were produced by FG, 4096 were added to last bit and 1 to first. pyramidfixer.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform not so, because the gap's a cone not a rectangle
a111: Logged on 2017-11-07 17:14 asciilifeform: ( why is there EVER EVEN ONE ?! )
a111: Logged on 2017-11-07 17:27 apeloyee: ......p_n are independent and uniformly distributed, then the probability of tuple of these being chosen is the same (by definition of independence), and because CRT gives a bijection, all outputs are equally likely. did I repeat myself enough?
a111: Logged on 2017-11-07 17:29 apeloyee: you want sci-hub to wwork for phree?
mircea_popescu: or whatever, if they don't feel like it, like eg ben_vulpes doesn't for his paste service, let them not to
mircea_popescu: but otherwhise there's no excuse available to the chuchka that "washing is too hard and besides rubbing against a tree trunk is a close approximation"
mircea_popescu: it wants to be whatever usg's silicon valley politruks appear to be willing to put stalin's notes behind that season.
a111: Logged on 2017-11-07 17:39 asciilifeform: i have nothing against ~simple and OBVIOUSLY correct~ optimizations, apeloyee
mircea_popescu: i suppose at this juncture a moderately interesting item would be to run some for loops and see.
mircea_popescu: numeric methods to the rescue. wtf are computers even for amirite.
mircea_popescu: but effect large enough to observe experimentally was observed experimentally.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform you're not proving it safe, you're examining if you can prove it unsafe.
mircea_popescu: more than nothing. for all the idle cycles being burned erryday...
mircea_popescu: tbh, by comparison with the volume of spurious strings pasted into shitsites, the amount of idle for loops executed to date seems dismall. less reddit more foring.
a111: Logged on 2017-11-07 18:48 asciilifeform: reason is so that each station can be physically indistinguishable, from outside the door, from, e.g., a defective lift motor that arcs a bit
mircea_popescu: what IS however overwhelmingly present in su of today is the howl of the newstyle ligthtbulb balancing circuits.
a111: Logged on 2017-11-07 19:00 apeloyee: and where you get 100kW on a moving object
mircea_popescu: i want an unit which lifts up the bridge, plugs into the car as if it were a wheel, and then simply converts.
mircea_popescu: park your car, put out 50kW or w/e the conversion yielkds.
mircea_popescu: i don't want that crap. i want a unit the size of washing machine.
mircea_popescu: at least on good quality german makes, it's not. i dunno about toyota nissan
mircea_popescu: that's not what i want. i want a washingmachine dynamo i can put in the back of the truck and take to middle of nowhere for tailgate party with megawatt power available.
mircea_popescu: how would the perma-modded truck fucking drive to there ?
mircea_popescu: i guess. but welding the washing machine into the truck bed seems meh.
mircea_popescu: carry little piddly engine when has proper engine under hood.
mircea_popescu: for one thing, inductive load is generally 3x the rated draw. 3kw is not a fucking ac unit for instance.
mircea_popescu: and most of the weight of the 30kg generator that needs a fuckming crane to move comfortably is the fucking engine, which guess what, i already have.
☟︎ mircea_popescu: and much better than any fucking converted lawnmower they sell as generator, for that matter.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform i tried like 5 diff ones, they're all shit.
mircea_popescu: basically a slightly overgrown common alternator, like fit for a truck, but put on car and hurr durr we have hybrids
mircea_popescu: no you don't, you have a truck alternator on a shitty nissan.
ben_vulpes: take out that drivetrain and they'll blow over in the wind
mircea_popescu: ben_vulpes gets it. the have the zamak because cheapest answer to dynamic problems.
mircea_popescu: and motor per wheel works on you know, 50ton tatra mining truck.
ben_vulpes: plus gotta reengineer differentials in software if yr going motor per wheel
ben_vulpes: not intractable, just more complicated than bolting a muxer to the driveshaft.
ben_vulpes still a fan of the wrightspeed/volt model of onboard generation and electric drivetrain
ben_vulpes: and how; wrightspeed has mega boner-inducing turbine generator
BingoBoingo: <asciilifeform> the gearbox is massive loss Internal friction in motor pistons ~50% loss, so what?
BingoBoingo: <asciilifeform> BingoBoingo may have the exact recipe, this is a thing welders, cement people, etc. actually do. << Called a "power take off" Standard issue on tractors. Special order on trucks.
BingoBoingo: <asciilifeform> ( vs motor-per-wheel ) << requires more software for traction control when you have all of the torque starting from 0
ben_vulpes: more perfectly correct software to write.
ben_vulpes: noob will hammer throttle, wheels will lose traction ~instantly
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform that pos goes over the wheel, bs. i want to bolt it on instead of the wheel!
mircea_popescu: i guess. though im not sure i want to perma-carry the generator coils.
mircea_popescu: i'd like a car like that, insteadof the "planet saving" bullshit.
mircea_popescu: charge tesla by running mercedes so the hipsters can hipster
mircea_popescu: have 20 meter high inflatable jumpything in middle of nowhere
a111: Logged on 2017-11-07 19:00 asciilifeform: ( iirc mircea_popescu has a 800kW diesel )
a111: Logged on 2017-11-07 19:02 apeloyee: to a reasonable value, but there's probably no escape from "keep moving"
a111: Logged on 2017-11-07 19:15 asciilifeform: well yes, in the sense that they spend the vast majority of time, silent
mircea_popescu:
http://btcbase.org/log/2017-11-07#1733562 << this is a doubtful proposition, as the enemy is basically "idiots", and much like nature having much more energy to burn than you do, idiots are much more affixed to their idiotarian ideology than you will ever be to yours.
☝︎ a111: Logged on 2017-11-07 19:17 apeloyee: the enemy doesn't realistically have resource to stand next to everyone. see bitcoin: can't make rewriting history impossible, lets make it unprofitable.
mircea_popescu: "this is the new consensus-community developed standard"
a111: Logged on 2017-11-07 19:36 asciilifeform: yet folx keep showing up to work.
mircea_popescu: 1. full employment ; 2. notwitstanding full employment, no work being done ever observed ; 3. notwithstanding no work being done ever observed, all plans realised > 100% ; 4. notwithstanding all plans always overfulfilled, no useful products ever on the open market ; 5. notwithstanding no products ever on open market, everyone well supplied ; 6. notwithstanding everyone well supplied, everyone always stealing ; 7. notwithstan
mircea_popescu: ding everyone always stealing, nothing ever went missing.
a111: Logged on 2017-11-07 20:05 asciilifeform: ( which will last maybe 40 min. when actual war, but nobody seems to give a shit. )
a111: Logged on 2017-11-07 20:09 asciilifeform: a budget-model pyongyang, could say.