130 entries in 0.676s
snsabot: Logged on 2019-10-30 10:22:55 mp_en_viaje: but we absolutely must look at the whole stack, with a clear eye, and clean it of alf idiocy. i don't even care if some useful
bits get thrown out in the process so much
mp_en_viaje: but we absolutely must look at the whole stack, with a clear eye, and clean it of alf idiocy. i don't even care if some useful
bits get thrown out in the process so much
mircea_popescu: the many blessings of travel, you
get to debug a random pile of strange every short time interval with arbitrarily limited toolsets. and people enjoy this! people who don't even
get to play with the bodies of the local choicer
bits. incomprehensible.
mod6: So if what I had previously believed above is true, and it would seem to considering my understanding of FZ_Add for instance, then "most junior
bits on the left" makes sense to me, but "FZ_Get_Head" seems perhaps a bit confusing. Although, when I typically "getHead()" or "getTail()" I expect to
get the 0-ith index, or the nth, respectively.
mircea_popescu: the 512 "central" cores are state machines that can do add or mul, and always proceed ~on their entire register set~. so if you don't want to multiply 131072-bit numbers, just put in zeros ; and if you put larger numbers in there you'll just
get the LAST 262144
bits of the result, is all.
mircea_popescu: so your reasoning was that if some
bits get left out the koch is gonna eat them ?
mircea_popescu: if i
get something like "only odd
bits of key can be leaked" we've won.
diana_coman: i.e. if one shifts right by 2
bits but provides an overflow of 8
bits than 6 of them
get simply or-ed, it's not like they
get pushed in
a111: Logged on 2018-11-01 17:44 asciilifeform: i had to algebraize the thing , and have just the right rng
bits flip in head , to
get the 'ceiling tiles' ( why didn't mircea_popescu
get'em in '15 ? )
a111: Logged on 2018-10-29 22:56 diana_coman: basically I
get http://btcbase.org/log/2018-10-29#1867091 BUT can't yet follow it to
http://btcbase.org/log/2018-10-29#1867092 mainly because it seems to me that the effect of A is basically in fixing d,f,h (so that xor(a,d,f,h)=0); in short: wouldn't a change (of any number of
bits) in a trigger (if imposing xor(a,d,f,h)=0 still) changes further in b-h so that the resulting key schedule is different? theoretically that would be the ration
a111: Logged on 2018-10-12 09:00 mircea_popescu: there's absolutely no excuse for having "urandom" as a kernel signal. applications that both a) care about entropy debit over time and b) can
get away with substituting shit for entropy should simply manage their entropy/shitropy interface in a dedicated thread. let it read from /dev/random, add however many
bits of 11110000 they want whenever they want to and vomit the resulting cesspool as the app that spawned them demands.
mircea_popescu: there's absolutely no excuse for having "urandom" as a kernel signal. applications that both a) care about entropy debit over time and b) can
get away with substituting shit for entropy should simply manage their entropy/shitropy interface in a dedicated thread. let it read from /dev/random, add however many
bits of 11110000 they want whenever they want to and vomit the resulting cesspool as the app that spawned them demands.
☟︎ mircea_popescu: some clever
bits of math permit one to encrypt a message with the use of that 221 so that only he who knows 13 * 17 =221 can ever
get it back out.
phf: (the previous error i mentioned in logs was probably using same compiler before it was installed into its destination, because it was being invoked with explicit -B flags (-B flag points to compiler
bits explicitly). this new failing bootstrapped compiler would work if provided explicit -B which makes me guess that some phase that was supposed to
get compiler into knowing where its
bits are failed.)
mircea_popescu: cause god damn it, who the fuck is gonna
get "married" and "monogamy" ? harem or
get lost, the social choices are asexual wankerism for the govt-supported and harem for the miscolred
bits crowd. that's it and that's all, the 1970 "new york of trades" where "every man" house, wife, children, etc (cher's moonstruck a fine example of this utopia as ever can be had) utterly disappeared sometime since america ended.
a111: Logged on 2018-07-15 15:38 mircea_popescu: asciilifeform check this out : i got a bundle which compiles to 64
bits except one lib, which compiles to 32 bit and then i
get " wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32 Program exited with code 0177". the configure for it manages to ignore both enable-lib64 --disable-lib32 and CFLAGS=-m64 CXXFLAGS=-m64 LDFLAGS=-m64 sets of flags. you ever heard of such ?!
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform check this out : i got a bundle which compiles to 64
bits except one lib, which compiles to 32 bit and then i
get " wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32 Program exited with code 0177". the configure for it manages to ignore both enable-lib64 --disable-lib32 and CFLAGS=-m64 CXXFLAGS=-m64 LDFLAGS=-m64 sets of flags. you ever heard of such ?!
☟︎ mod6: <+asciilifeform> mod6: by all indications you have a box with iron problem. in your place i'd
get a fresh set of iron, rather than sinking sweat into interpreting randomly flipped
bits as 'bug' << yeah for sure, it certainly could be related to the disk issue. I don't really think it's a 'bug' or anything.
mircea_popescu: because this is how they age -- they become ever more elaborate in their idiocy. THIS is the deep meaning of "Interesting to see the
bits he gets 'right' , such as no anonymity, but then to see him see him turn around and" : he didn't
get anything right.
mircea_popescu: listen, why not
get yourself a rsa key, a proper irc set-up, choose a name that's not retarded and start a blog, publish the respective
bits...
a111: Logged on 2018-04-07 01:25 mircea_popescu: 6mb to
get a fucking blog cms going. oh epic world of
bits...
mircea_popescu: 6mb to
get a fucking blog cms going. oh epic world of
bits...
☟︎ a111: Logged on 2018-04-05 20:07 mircea_popescu: we have the perfect mechanism of antipantsuit publishing ;
http://btcbase.org/log/2018-01-13#1770196 . what's the "color of
bits" pantsuit system supposed to do,
get trinque to swear in court you sent it to him ?
ben_vulpes: whoever it was managed to
get some identifying
bits right and others insultingly wrong
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform you have a different problem : even if "no bit of input is more influential than other" i STILL want to put in no less than 2045
bits of input ; AND
get out no MORE! than 2048 bit long prime.
a111: Logged on 2018-01-04 22:30 asciilifeform: 'top 2
bits and bottom bit are ALWAYS 1!' << asciilifeform still doesn't
get why to weld the next-to-highest
phf: i feel like you chould email it to chuck moore, he'll
get a kick out of it "saves 25
bits on my greenarray cluster!"
mircea_popescu: he's now at describing the mindbogglingly ugly hacks of how to
get 32 bit fixnums out of 36 bit words with 6
bits of tag and 2 of code and so on, "oh actually the lowe order quarter can be repurposed"
mircea_popescu: nevertheless, the correct solution to this "quickly, prime this many
bits long" is a n, k tuple which contains n as the bitsize and k as the "oddness". if you want the n - 396 k = 5 prime you
get 2^396- 1229
a111: Logged on 2017-11-14 11:25 diana_coman: apeloyee, if I understand that correctly basically the only way to plug that leak would be to give up on diddling p and q, including setting size; which would mean just
get random pairs of primes until their product fits the desired number of
bits for the key; obv this lands into the trouble of having one of them too small
diana_coman: apeloyee, if I understand that correctly basically the only way to plug that leak would be to give up on diddling p and q, including setting size; which would mean just
get random pairs of primes until their product fits the desired number of
bits for the key; obv this lands into the trouble of having one of them too small
☟︎ a111: Logged on 2017-11-13 15:09 asciilifeform: but you can trivially show that using the bottom
bits in this way lets you actually
get 4x as many possible primes
a111: Logged on 2017-11-02 02:46 lobbes: anyways, for the wotpastes specifically, I plan to download and store those myself from the
get-go (and NOT route them through archive.is), seeing as those are easily 'flagged' due to the predictable url. To alf's point, even if archive.is stays up, diddling is always a threat. Any
bits I can do without it now is +ev imo
lobbes: anyways, for the wotpastes specifically, I plan to download and store those myself from the
get-go (and NOT route them through archive.is), seeing as those are easily 'flagged' due to the predictable url. To alf's point, even if archive.is stays up, diddling is always a threat. Any
bits I can do without it now is +ev imo
☟︎ a111: Logged on 2017-10-08 00:16 asciilifeform: the ONLY correct method of generating cryptoprimes, is to 1)
get N
bits from FUCKGOATS 2) determine, in fixed spacetime every single time, whether that string of
bits constitutes a usable prime.
a111: Logged on 2017-10-08 00:16 asciilifeform: the ONLY correct method of generating cryptoprimes, is to 1)
get N
bits from FUCKGOATS 2) determine, in fixed spacetime every single time, whether that string of
bits constitutes a usable prime.
a111: Logged on 2017-08-14 16:14 asciilifeform: ( tldr : superiority of the FUCKGOATS-enabled approach, of
get-new-N-
bits-from-rng-then-primalitytest-until-done, vs the kochian
get-N-
bits-then-increment-until-passes-millerrabin )
a111: Logged on 2015-01-13 18:05 mircea_popescu: lizard empire very large, very porous, generally i
get the good
bits before they fully propagated even.
mircea_popescu: which is how "it's either 4096
bits long or
get lost" ends up in there.
a111: Logged on 2017-08-14 16:14 asciilifeform: ( tldr : superiority of the FUCKGOATS-enabled approach, of
get-new-N-
bits-from-rng-then-primalitytest-until-done, vs the kochian
get-N-
bits-then-increment-until-passes-millerrabin )
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform you are running a computer. (not crap, an actual tmsr is happy with machine). when i start mine up, i want to
get some
bits from you. maybe it's "what sina said about mp on gossipd". maybe it's "the nth block in the current blockchain". maybe it's whatever it is. how does it do this ?
mircea_popescu: mod6 you take a number of say 22
bits, and cut it in two 11 bit numbers. this 11 is the k. then you have first part * 2 ^ K (=11) + second part to
get the original back
sina: 16mins to
get through ~36000
bits Framedragger: for symlink fs testers (or maybe selfnote for later): note that if you allow for sufficient folder tree depth, the "1000s of symlinks per dir" won't realistically happen when storing, say, bitcoin transaction hashes. the latter have 256
bits => 64 hex chars. if you allow for depth of 8 where last level (8) is symlink itself, you
get 32
bits per folder level.
mircea_popescu: i mean i
get it, everyone agrees the us is a colony now, but from that it doesn't exactly follow which
bits fall into which spheres of influence does it.
BingoBoingo: Motherfucker *wants* to
get cuck'd by a couple
bits of plastic
mats: the us is a nice place, i wonder what
bits will
get carved out for .cn colonies
shinohai: nope, ben_vulpes helpedme to
get docs uploading from cli so I'm using republican
bits now
a111: Logged on 2016-08-18 04:05 asciilifeform: char *p = get_random_bits( nbits, randomlevel, secret )
BingoBoingo:
bits and pieces, but the gist I
get is pseudo-mantadory middlemen break markets
BingoBoingo: anyways this time I'll probably actually try it in the store before leaving.
Get drill, masonry
bits, and concrete block then test it in the tool rental area. If people test riding morwers there I don't see why I can't test drill.
mircea_popescu: also don't use common dril
bits on metal you'll fuck everything up.
get special.
jurov: say you fudge the throws badly and in the end
get only 2
bits per throw
mircea_popescu: this because 2
bits = 2^2 = 4. had the shift been 17
bits, then you'd
get to do 2^17 = 131072 old style hashings for each new style digest you calculate.
phf: ben_vulpes:
get-difficulty is a straight rip of the c from bitcoinrpc.cpp << correct way to do that one is to write
get-index-best that returns block-index structure that you can
get bits value from, and then have
get-difficulty do all the equivalent calculations in scheme, bitshifting and all
mircea_popescu: "I'm going back to the frozen north, where the pricks are hard and strong. Back to the land of the all-night stand-where the nights are six months long, where you
get it in
bits as hard as tin in the land where spunk is spunk - not a trickling stream of lukewarm cream, but a solid frozen chunk."
mircea_popescu: same thing happens to me, i
get various
bits i end up keeping for a long time.
shinohai: I love my tech, don't
get me wrong. But a few nights in the desert or mountains does wonders for clearing away the clutter amongst the little grey
bits.
mod6: hanbot: << picked the renaming
bits out of here, worked for me, thanks. did not
get the syntax error! << ahh ok thanks for the update. glad you didn't
get the error. my ubuntu needs to go to glue factory.
assbot: Logged on 20-08-2015 06:38:34; hanbot: <mod6> so i ended up chaging the file name to "vdiff.sh" + chmod 0755, and then changing the script so it reads: "vdiff.sh a b > genesis.vpatch" << picked the renaming
bits out of here, worked for me, thanks. did not
get the syntax error!
hanbot: <mod6> so i ended up chaging the file name to "vdiff.sh" + chmod 0755, and then changing the script so it reads: "vdiff.sh a b > genesis.vpatch" << picked the renaming
bits out of here, worked for me, thanks. did not
get the syntax error!
☟︎ diana_coman: and
bits of nothing are like 11-12 satoshi or you'll prolly
get some for free from someone (me even)
shinohai: "
get paid in quality
bits of nothing" <<< Dogecoin ?
jurov: and
get paid in quality
bits of nothing ;D