500+ entries in 0.326s
BingoBoingo omitted from the notes post that I did during the closing chit chat bring up that "folks from my part of the US have a
reputation for naivety, to the point some go so far as to call us rubes" as we discussed the insanity of common law systems.
diana_coman: hanbot_abroad it's !!
reputation hanbot_abroad you want there.
lobbes: Add in the feedback cycle, digging into mpwp mysql guts, new additions to spec tacked on (here I would link to various documented pieces on blog, if I had a working one) and I don't come anywhere close to 5-hours. It will be serving Trilema, and it is needed to be correct in one go; no do-overs. My
reputation's on the line here. Spot of work my foot!
mp_en_viaje: asciilifeform, you never discussed WHY it just added to
reputation of charlatan. why did it ?
mp_en_viaje: incidentally : one should absolutely not trust any norwegian. assholes scam like they breathe ; i dunno why various africans have a bad
reputation, i have literally never been scammed by a hotel before, ever.
mircea_popescu: !!
reputation stjohn_piano_2 -10 yet another self-sufferer / impudent lout.
diana_coman: stjohn_piano_2: note the dissonance in your approach - if you want
reputation here, you need to do stuff that is useful here (there's a long list of such stuff that needs doing, pick, start on it and document as you go/ask politely and intelligently for help when you need it); onth if you want "
reputation" for landing a programming job irl, dropping links here won't help (I doubt the Edgecase thing will help either but that's entirely up to
mp_en_viaje: well yes, but not if you get a
reputation for doing inane bs.
mp_en_viaje: asciilifeform, or as buffett put it back in the day his brain still worked, "when a manager with a
reputation for success attempts to tackle a problem with a
reputation for intractability, it is the manager's
reputation that ends up tarnished"
a111: Logged on 2018-12-18 14:51 mircea_popescu: the exact same thing applies universally and throiughout. the world works a certain way, and it will continue to do so. if you build a blog on the strength of being interesting, you will destroy it with crap ; and if you build a
reputation on being sane, you will destroy it with insanity. and so on. at no point is your "conviction" at issue (nor is it interesting, nor important). what's at issue is ~reality~, and reality does
mircea_popescu: the exact same thing applies universally and throiughout. the world works a certain way, and it will continue to do so. if you build a blog on the strength of being interesting, you will destroy it with crap ; and if you build a
reputation on being sane, you will destroy it with insanity. and so on. at no point is your "conviction" at issue (nor is it interesting, nor important). what's at issue is ~reality~, and reality does
☟︎ mircea_popescu:
http://btcbase.org/log/2018-12-18#1881342 << this, for the record, is exactly how things go. one can build himself a
reputation as a director, on the strength (on the ~strength~!!!) of shit like pulp fiction, or reservoir dogs, or w/e the hell. but if the one then continues in the vein of bullshit, directing animation and whatnever kill bill nonsense, uma thurman's deformed toes, that someone will ~destroy~ his
reputation, an
☝︎ billymg: and at this point i'm just trying to build my
reputation so wouldn't be looking for anything beyond a fair rating
BingoBoingo: mircea_popescu: I find it entirely natural and to
reputation's credit that it would have puta
mircea_popescu: BingoBoingo don't you find it distinctly amusing that
reputation has "puta" in it ?
a111: Logged on 2018-10-09 18:54 asciilifeform: Mocky: does the place live up to the
reputation for 'top smog' ?
diana_coman: the !!
reputation thing is correct there though; so it might be only the visualizer
mircea_popescu: consider by way of ilustration that frank sinatra has this
reputation, unexamined, apodictic, of some kind of smooth, very sexually powerful operator. this
reputation was built on the basis of a bunch of idiotic films written and directed by gene kelly, the adam sandler of the 40s, in which frank sinatra is POINTEDLY SEXUALLY INEPT.
mircea_popescu: do me a favour and add #Do not change this if you're not entirely sure ; talk in #pizarro to make sure ; messing up the routing will cost you your
reputation.
diana_coman: that's what it sounded to me too although I'd have thought there was more than "they know stuff" to whatever
reputation there might be there; then again, sorrying one's way out of answering a question is the same pick and choose approach so not surprising
mircea_popescu: diana_coman i suppose we have a "
reputation" among the script kiddies ahem i mean "hackers" etcetera.
trinque: if you're trying to guard
reputation, all you need to do is communicate clearly about the mechanism, and be done with it.
ben_vulpes: im also evaluating this claim that the lone star state is somehow not the same thin plastic veneer over zamac the rest of the country's made of. it at least has endogenous oil stores and the locals carry a
reputation for being profit minded
mod6: !!
reputation stjohn_piano
mircea_popescu: if it operates but poorly i suppose the argument could be brought mocky's good
reputation is being stained ; however it's so damned easy to check.
a111: Logged on 2018-06-17 00:25 lobbes: douchebag: at least keep reading the logs. I wager that if you do, within 5 years time you may start seeing the value of building
reputation with the world's only sovereign
lobbes: douchebag: at least keep reading the logs. I wager that if you do, within 5 years time you may start seeing the value of building
reputation with the world's only sovereign
☟︎ cnomad: well that's where
reputation comes into play
diana_coman: cnomad, do you specifically want to *not* develop a
reputation here ?
cnomad: i don't want to develop
reputation, just wanna say hi and observe
lobbes:
http://logs.bvulpes.com/pizarro?d=2018-5-31#366191 << You know, I was still going to rate you positively on the basis of your service to the republic, but then I thought "why?". You decide that on your way out the door you'll try and casually attack my
reputation on the basis of... what exactly? Yeah, I made those comments. But then I sat, thought, came to my senses, left kako to rot, joined #t, built an auction bot, built an archive process, lea
lobbes: asciilifeform: Ftr, my original !!unrate of shinohai was reflective of the fact that I could not at the time discern if he was coming/going/passive-aggressively-whatevering. When I return to my key I'll rate the guy positively as this satisfies my earlier stated criteria of "there are ways to gracefully exit while preserving
reputation"
danielpbarron: that you care about your bad
reputation goes a long way for me, but i can't say there is anything in particular you can do to remedy. if you don't do anything else annoying i'll prolly switch it to positive the next time i go through my ratings.
a111: Logged on 2018-05-23 00:37 douchebag: ben_vulpes, esthlos, and danielpbarron - is there anything I can do to to repair my
reputation? Let me know, and get back to me.
douchebag: ben_vulpes, esthlos, and danielpbarron - is there anything I can do to to repair my
reputation? Let me know, and get back to me.
☟︎ a111: Logged on 2018-05-20 18:34 trinque: this is a pretty shitty
reputation all around.
trinque: this is a pretty shitty
reputation all around.
☟︎ mod6: !!
reputation douchebag
trinque: mod6: contracts often have a cure period, eh? suppose it's "negrated party has $time to fix his
reputation"
mod6: !!
reputation fettiffany
fromdeedbot: and your
reputation means something and can be quantified
mircea_popescu: word. you're building quite the diplomatic
reputation for yourself, you know that ?
a111: Logged on 2018-04-11 06:07 lobbes: ^ que pasa contigo, shinohai? There's a way to step back gracefully that would preserve your solid
reputation, but abandoning your post ain't that way.
lobbes: ^ que pasa contigo, shinohai? There's a way to step back gracefully that would preserve your solid
reputation, but abandoning your post ain't that way.
☟︎ trinque: cassidy3: in here your recourse if I steal your money is to tarnish the
reputation held on deedbot that to date says I've stolen from no one. out there, what, sue?
phf: !!
reputation david_francois
trinque: I am not tarnishing my
reputation by the wallet operating as anything other than a mechanism.
BingoBoingo: And any potential saviors looking for a vanity project ought to mind that likely the best thing for my health and
reputation is going to be returning to familiar AA meetings and the humble, anonymous life working in a hardware store.
mp_en_viaje: you get an interesting blog and a great
reputation.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform admire the recursive gift : his "
reputation in the community" doth indeed grow. what now.
a111: Logged on 2018-01-23 06:19 douchebag: mircea_popescu: I want a career as a pentester, so far I feel I'm doing pretty good in terms of getting experience and
reputation in the community. Do you have any suggestions for ways I that could get further on my career path?
a111: Logged on 2018-01-23 06:19 douchebag: mircea_popescu: I want a career as a pentester, so far I feel I'm doing pretty good in terms of getting experience and
reputation in the community. Do you have any suggestions for ways I that could get further on my career path?
douchebag: mircea_popescu: I want a career as a pentester, so far I feel I'm doing pretty good in terms of getting experience and
reputation in the community. Do you have any suggestions for ways I that could get further on my career path?
☟︎☟︎ caaddr: something from the same book: gpg2 does not allow export of the two RSA primes, p and q, from a password protected key. it does not think that you *own your own primes*. the primes upon which your
reputation rests
jhvh1: mircea_popescu: Error: "
reputation" is not a valid command.