600+ entries in 1.885s
mircea_popescu: whereas man, especially if sane, is interested in doing not in canning the
deeds.
mod6: I've got 14 new
deeds that I'm about ready to sign and have tested before feeding them to deedbot.
mod6: essentially, i've taken all the buildroot deps (typically collected from the wan), along with the trb
deeds, placed them in a local dir with the build script (modified to suit this process) and launched.
mircea_popescu: mkay then. the man's
deeds and his words are not alligned.
mod6: So, yeah, added in the pull of the
deeds, the checking of the sigs, uudecoded, and checked the output hashes. not just on the craptastic four; also put in explicit sig checking on the rotor and V.
mod6: So was thinking, make these four as
deeds, then create a follow on deed that is a disclaimer that references the four artifact
deeds - stating that the archive extracted will have the following hashes and that my signature doesn't declare that I have written or read the code. Something to that effect.
a111: Logged on 2016-07-14 02:11 mod6: trinque: is there a max length for
deeds? (just curious about the above ^, some of these might be mightly large)
mod6: trinque: is there a max length for
deeds? (just curious about the above ^, some of these might be mightly large)
☟︎ jurov: iirc it was in first deedbot incarnation and i had to pester the
deeds.b-a second deedbot incarnation to reupload it
trinque: Framedragger: myup,
deeds.bitcoin-assets.com no longer points to deedbot.org
mircea_popescu: trinque i has nfi, all i know is i put
deeds in, wanted to add them to s.mg report, can't add because no link!
mircea_popescu: here, there's no historical establishment. the guy lives through his
deeds not through a lengthy, boring story about "hey listen, back in 1920 carnegie and j p morgan were pretty cool so we should still be getting free petrocheese and chinese plastics for this reason".
mircea_popescu: anyway, lest the wrong impression forms - we don't have a good understanding of who did what to whom and why. it's not even clear we enumerated the classes of
deeds that phuctor dredged up.
mircea_popescu: fromphuctor do you understand how
deeds/deedbot work ?
mircea_popescu: recall, the WoT is NOT!!! about the user in question. but about his
deeds and their reflection. only.
mircea_popescu: i dun recall. if i said i did, but anyway.
deeds of this nature deserve to be properly congratulated.
trinque: but I have the new one eating
deeds; a bit more work and deedbot- will not be needed anymore
trinque: then my gossipd deednode chatters about rating
deeds to mike_c after x confirmations
mircea_popescu: how the fuck are you going to introduce payment for, eg,
deeds ? and if you do, how is it going to beat $pay deed.
danielpbarron: same idea with
deeds ; could submit same thing over over, but then get neg-rated out of a voice
danielpbarron: i think it depends if any other
deeds get bundled with it
trinque: your
deeds will go out soon as he's able
jurov: omg there are 110M
deeds?
jurov: trinque what do you use to search deedbot's
deeds? google sucksfor this, duckduckgo only a bit less
mircea_popescu: kakobrekla could we has
deeds.bitcoin-assets.com added ? assigned to deedbot.org
punkman: one interesting thing would be land
deeds notarized on the bitcoin chain
trinque: ben_vulpes: first I'm getting deed txns going by using the trb wallet; I don't want to have to wait for an implementation of eatrawtx to resume
deeds punkman: making
deeds with all the emails?
danielpbarron: but they are anon for the exact same reason >> They keep it anonymous, because they are evil and they do not want themselves and their evil
deeds to be exposed, as it is written, Everyone practicing evil hates the light and does not come to the light, lest his
deeds should be exposed. (John 3:20)
BingoBoingo: trinque: Are you sure deedbot- is only ~10 blocks behind? I'm not seeing any of today's
deeds on the www
mircea_popescu: "not like it's my job to conform my stupid head to the
deeds of the greater men i perceive. i shall advise them instead!"
mod6: is there a way to search the
deeds in deedbot?
adlai wonders whether qntra would be a better venue than
deeds for summaries; it has the advantage of requiring review and implying approval, rather than merely inviting sha256 and best-effort backup
adlai wonders how serene a republic must get for the first n00b to volunteer log summary
deeds... not like anybody able to pay for this would either do so or volunteer himself
adlai: kakobrekla: what are the qualifications? L4? ability to verify
deeds? these things have to be selective, to keep out idiots...
adlai: save my good shit for
deeds and ehemera
trinque: heh. henceforth you may only deed
deeds already deeded!
mircea_popescu: that would be revolutionary, and disrupting and whatnot : have a social media outlet where people can give themselves
deeds for abandoned property, and everyone signs.
nubbins`: i forgot we were doing
deeds here
trinque: adlai: I assume you have been verifying the
deeds by picking up the dust
punkman: there's another puzzle in the
deeds with some future-gold. would buy you about a bag of coal right now.
adlai is doing
deeds, isn't that how they're supposed to verb?
mircea_popescu: there was once a group of 20something chicks that lived in so and so apartments and did so and so
deeds and things. their history became the controlling factor for an entire generation of english speakers, who went and got rachedo's and so on and so forth. part A of comparison.
punkman: yes, there are 2
deeds in that one
punkman: davout: you need the whole bundle, can't verify individual
deeds mircea_popescu: some people who wrote
deeds are dead. some are not. some LINES of deed writing exist ; some are dead.
trinque: one for general
deeds, one for buy/sell ads, one for rates?
trinque: ben_vulpes | worst case scenario, unless the standard is verifiability, #bitcoin-jesters could cause all sortsa problems trying to federate their wot into this one. << I have pondered making deedbot- eat rss feeds *of
deeds*; sounds applicable here
mircea_popescu: trinque incidentally, re midnightmagic's question, i don't recall the format. was it the
deeds get concatenated with \n as aseparator, sha512'd and that's the pubkey for the spend ?
trinque: yep, can be something like categories for particular
deeds maybe, this being a "buy/sell"
mircea_popescu: once you get the search engine for this, prolly can be applied to
deeds too
kakobrekla: speaking of searchable, current
deeds are not if im correct?
mircea_popescu: however! it occurs to me this actually would work splendidly with
deeds.
trinque: PSA: I'm moving the blockchain for deedbot- to a larger volume, during which it will reject all
deeds.
trinque: mircea_popescu: currently the thing listens to me only; when I get a chance, I'll grab the code from the
deeds module and let L1 control feeds
trinque: he can up himself here, and submit
deeds trinque: this is why I suggest
deeds for this, rather than WoT ratings
trinque: kakobrekla: pls to cname
deeds.bitcoin-assets.org to deedbot.org ?
trinque: hey, btw. if someone cnames
deeds.bitcoin-assets.com to deedbot.org I'll make that link in the declaration work again.
mircea_popescu: i'm not an authority on subcaucasian tribal customs, but my guess would be that such
deeds would be a face wound for the poor guy in question incompatible with any sort of continued authority.
Adlai: !s verifying
deeds trinque: this grouping together of things signed can be done with
deeds as they are
punkman: not that I'd mind patch
deeds, but can basically deed patch hashes already
trinque: mircea_popescu: he's considering a case where the thing would be able to accept new detached sigs for existing
deeds punkman: (or
deeds out of binaries)
punkman: I just mentioned it as an easy way to make
deeds out of patches
trinque: and then maybe deedbot farts out additional nav controls on the html versions of these interesting
deeds with a particular sexp in them
trinque: to date I've tried to keep it simple, hence the
deeds are plain textfiles linked to by a single index
trinque: and I can modify deedbot- however it helps; he already statically generates his site, perhaps he could interpret metadata in certain
deeds and take action
trinque: I might make the rating requirement for site-archival a bit higher than for
deeds trinque: now that the de-dockerization is complete, I may have it announce its current balance along with newly uploaded
deeds decimation: home | log | search |
deeds | bash | stats | wiki
ben_vulpes: ^^ the wot at work. ridiculous numbers aside, we tell stories of heroic
deeds performed in service of the papers we sign.
pete_dushenski: mircea_popescu:
deeds with code bundles and instructions makes sense.
mircea_popescu: i think most everyone's using github or w/e - but it wouldn't maybe be such a bad idea to start putting
deeds out with the code bundles. with instructions. "run this so and so"
Anduck: ok well, anyone know how to verify deedbot.org
deeds?
trinque: davout: saw your feedback re: going through
deeds by author. sounds great; I'll try to find time for that
mircea_popescu: the interest, here or anywhere, for the
deeds of anyone pretending to be in cryptocurrency who doesn't meet the minimum bar of competency for that field is not unlike the interest we show scientists that can't add. "will there be nudity ?"
davout: trinque: deedbot feature request, "View
deeds by user X" on deedbot.org