709 entries in 0.733s
assbot:
deeds signed by kakobrekla
punkbot: ben_vulpes: No pending
deeds | Last bundle 2 hours and 31 minutes ago
punkman: re: merkle tree - maybe in the future where we have 100
deeds per bundle, but it's already a hash tree so...
nubbins`: but how will we generate
deeds locally and fund the addresses ourselves if
deeds.bitcoin-assets.com is down
punkman: well better post any
deeds before it explodes
gribble:
deeds.bitcoin-assets.com is up
jurov: ;;isup
deeds.bitcoin-assets.com
nubbins`: assuming no other
deeds get submitted, address should match up as well
punkman: BingoBoingo: you rascal, triggered another bug in bot with your last two
deeds punkbot: BingoBoingo: 2 pending
deeds | Last bundle 4 hours and 50 minutes ago
punkbot: BingoBoingo: 2 pending
deeds | Last bundle 2 hours and 31 minutes ago
punkbot: BingoBoingo: No valid
deeds found, try again. (dupe: 1)
punkbot: mircea_popescu: No valid
deeds found, try again. (invalid: 1)
punkbot: cazalla: No valid
deeds found, try again.
punkbot: punkman: No valid
deeds found, try again. (invalid: 1)
punkbot: punkman: No pending
deeds | Last bundle 3 hours and 4 minutes ago
punkbot: punkman: No valid
deeds found, try again. (untrusted: 1)
PeterL: 64 what,
deeds per bundle?
PeterL: for deedbot, if you have multiple
deeds waiting for confirmation, could you combine the transactions into a single bitcoin transaction?
punkbot: BingoBoingo: No valid
deeds found, try again. (invalid: 1)
punkbot: BingoBoingo: No valid
deeds found, try again. (invalid: 1)
punkbot: BingoBoingo: No valid
deeds found, try again. (invalid: 1)
punkbot: BingoBoingo: No valid
deeds found, try again. (invalid: 1)
punkbot: ben_vulpes: 2 pending
deeds | Last bundle 6 hours and 32 minutes ago
punkbot: BingoBoingo: No valid
deeds found, try again. (invalid: 1)
punkbot: TheNewDeal: No pending
deeds | Last bundle 4 hours and 7 minutes ago
thestringpuller: punkman: who can upload
deeds? is there an "approved users" list?
punkman: kakobrekla: maybe add link to
deeds. on other pages
punkbot: punkman: No pending
deeds | Last bundle 1 minute ago | 1 unconfirmed bundle
punkbot: punkman: No valid
deeds found, try again. (invalid: 1)
punkbot: punkman: No pending
deeds | Last bundle 2 hours and 27 minutes ago
mircea_popescu: in the sense that braindamaged implementations of nothing in particular are similar to actually useful implementations on the same basis, then yes, all c code reminds one of all c code and
deeds of colored coins
thickasthieves: why does this whole
deeds, b-a form, sending 1btc to urself, hash, thing make me think about colored coins?
assbot: Logged on 11-08-2014 00:24:04; mircea_popescu: Jason the idea is to expand current bitcoin-assets functionality with a register of
deeds.
gernika: Is there a seminal discussion on
deeds/deedbot I can read up on?
nubbins`: are the raw
deeds published, or just the raw bundles?
nubbins`: and i can't fetch via curl because the website has escaped all the html chars inside the
deeds nubbins`: i can't copy/paste the
deeds because of line endings
mircea_popescu: nubbins`: i am unable to verify two of the 5 processed
deeds: <<< software never fails eh stan ? if it worked once it always works right ? :DF
nubbins`: punkman: the 4 pending
deeds all verify as well
nubbins`: i am unable to verify two of the 5 processed
deeds: 6LTeLfd6Scf1sgq9qmAYCT51oqoNmGP4k9uBp9oZtwR1 and kLuzx7GDPg8uXRawaZG9ndU7hfTd8CBHSTCCffSdzLA
punkman: yeah but I gotta verify the
deeds punkman: it won't make a new bundle, will leave
deeds pending
mod6: <+bounce> dirty
deeds, done dirt cheap << +1
nubbins`: need your dirty
deeds verified? roll into #b-a
bounce: dirty
deeds, done dirt cheap
punkman: so there's a lot of ways to make dupe
deeds nubbins`: silly is not being able to verify
deeds because they use retarded EOL
nubbins`: and it would be extremely important to convert all \r\n to \n when publishing
deeds.
nubbins`: otherwise how the fuck is anyone using anything other than Windows going to be able to verify
deeds?