500+ entries in 0.642s

mircea_popescu: between 2 and 4 the difference simply is "2 was a linux kernel, 4 is treasonable atrocity built atop 3, which is how you say '''mike 
hearn''' in linux"
 mircea_popescu: (among teh great advantages of ye log import : sql search for "power" "rangers" now yields 94 rows in set, all of the Forum logs for X format. yippee! i kinda do vaguely regret however not bothering to immortalize the original gushing fan on tardstalk, "oh, you guys are like power rangers!!!" in excited response to the perceived great acumen displayed by 
hearn fucking up bitcoin while everyone else was watching manga)
 mp_en_viaje: (the whole "power rangers" thing started with 
an event in 2013, when some usg agents masquerading as bitcoin developers (mike 
hearn, etc) wilfully introduced a bug which split the network while the other morons (wuile, maxwell, etc) failed to notice. the thing had to be undone through miner collu
  mircea_popescu: btw, BingoBoingo do you happen to have anywhere saved the original reddit "you guys are power rangers!!!" idiocy ? iirc was during 
hearn's wrecking fork.
 a111: Logged on 2017-09-10 19:43 mircea_popescu: 
http://btcbase.org/log/2017-09-10#1711757 << you don't understand : the deprecated lib is part of th ewallet, because the mike 
hearn / power ranger imbeciles "updated" the db scheme of prb in order to INCLUDE a new db dependency, and one made by google, but DID NOT remove the old one.
  mircea_popescu: 
http://btcbase.org/log/2017-09-10#1711757 << you don't understand : the deprecated lib is part of th ewallet, because the mike 
hearn / power ranger imbeciles "updated" the db scheme of prb in order to INCLUDE a new db dependency, and one made by google, but DID NOT remove the old one.
 ☝︎☟︎ mircea_popescu: and the list keeps going and going. gavin or mike 
hearn were (their moral turpitude aside), ~technically~ qualified to participate back in 2012.
 user705: oh mike 
hearn had that bright idea a while ago
 mircea_popescu: if memory serves 
hearn was also merit washed as "something or the other" engineer at google.
 mircea_popescu: for as long as one entertains even faint delusions that who knows, packard is maybe a person too, that "coreboot" retarded, what's her name, is maybe human like we are, that gavin or 
hearn have mothers and fathers and children and smell roses rather than you know, dwelling in rats nests like the rats they are and come out of ootheca like any other kitchen cockroach - for as long as that delusion is even vaguely present it's n
 mircea_popescu: there's ~no value in considering the individual "people" as people. take mike 
hearn. he's not as much "mike 
hearn" as he is "lemme break this while right solution" + x + y.
 mircea_popescu: ironically i fucking warned the idiots when they fired the 
hearn toothpick. but, too dumb to figure it out.
 mircea_popescu: what exactly is the logic of keeping a blog to feed dead tree book publishing business when a) the publishing business is really trying to sell pdfs for 5 paypalbux and b) the blog is read by fewer people than ever heard of mike 
hearn ?!
 jurov: this yes. but not gavin and 
hearn mircea_popescu: i dunno that the question was ever settled, or seriously considered. but it'd be expected prb begins with the famous "you are like power rtangers" nonsense, during the original 
hearn-induced fork.
 assbot: BitBet - The 
Hearn-Gavin scamcoin will fizzle in 2016 :: 101.11 B (96%) on Yes, 4.16 B (4%) on No | closing in 4 months 2 weeks | weight: 44`405 (100`000 to 1) ... ( 
http://bit.ly/1JoYZVq )
  pete_dushenski: but that's what you get for sucking mike 
hearn's dong and expecting a cream soda to come gushing out.
 mircea_popescu: anyway, what's the true truth of truthiness BingoBoingo, is 
hearn quitted or did he quit like stolfi ?
 mircea_popescu: i was half hoping 
hearn would get together with the bitcoin wife and that impossibly named, horsefaced washington staffer chick and create a hot love triangle of "How I created Bitcoin successfully, a guide" "Level your DB" etc.
 SamPatt: I didn't want to make it a "Is 
Hearn a core dev or not?" blog post, but just gave him the point on that. I do later say it's a non-event, because in the grand scheme I agree it wasn't important.
 pete_dushenski: also working on belated 
hearn eulogy and trb history part ii this week.
 mod6: "
hearn said this, 
hearn said that, 
hearn said bitcoin is dead..." snore. no one cares, go back to sleep.
 noobsRus: i appreciate the work you do maintaining a narrative grounded in reality. with the latest 
hearn stunt i felt i should perhaps explore ways i might assist
 ascii_butugychag:  be a New York Times article saying Mike 
Hearn broke up with Bitcoin and called it a failed experiment."' << l0l
 BingoBoingo: But yes, fiat media was all ready to run on 
hearn's "Bitcoin dead" and loyal USG exchanges ready to prevent buying to fire the broomstick one last time
 BingoBoingo: But it's easy to see how this plays out. 
Hearn agenda fails and he loudly quits. Derps knee jerk sold on 
Hearn agenda which is still a pile of fail
 thestringpuller: what's so lulzy? that Gavin and 
Hearn tried to build a nuke and failed miserably like best korea. (where their solution to rockets is having 1000 north koreans fling the bomb over the ocean)
 assbot: Gavin Andresen and Mike 
Hearn want to sabotage Bitcoin on behalf of the US government. - Andrew Auernheimer ... ( 
http://bit.ly/1UTtY3m )
  mircea_popescu: reading mike 
hearn is like reading timecube without the humor, writing skill, grounding in reality, variety and aesthetic appreciation.
 BingoBoingo: ;;later tell bitstein I missed that original piece by Mike 
Hearn. I see no reason to link it or an archive of in in the Qntra article. Mike 
Hearn hasn't had a say on any subject in a long time. Why should he get one about himself?
 adlai blinks... since when does deedbot- follow nyt? or 
hearn for that matter?
 thestringpuller: What is this nonsense? Mike 
Hearn gets exiled from Bitcoin and decides to keep complaining?
 ascii_butugychag: afaik 
hearn was a loud, unrepentant 'garnish' from day 1 on stage ...?
 mircea_popescu: " Mr. 
Hearn, until recently one of the most prominent leaders of the Bitcoin project, became so disillusioned that in December he sold the few hundred Bitcoins he had left and quietly took a job at a new start-up."
 mircea_popescu: "Two years ago, Mr. 
Hearn quit a cushy programming job at Googles Swiss headquarters" << dude gtfo, cushy gofer job.
 assbot: BitBet - The 
Hearn-Gavin scamcoin will fizzle in 2016 :: 101.11 B (96%) on Yes, 4.13 B (4%) on No | closing in 5 months 3 weeks | weight: 56`578 (100`000 to 1) ... ( 
http://bit.ly/1VHTw4t )
  assbot: BitBet - The 
Hearn-Gavin scamcoin will fizzle in 2016 :: 101.11 B (96%) on Yes, 4.13 B (4%) on No | closing in 5 months 3 weeks | weight: 56`630 (100`000 to 1) ... ( 
http://bit.ly/1VHTw4t )
  mircea_popescu: pre 
hearn&fail-bip, the standard was pretty high. by now it's a lot easier to argue "hey, at least it's not as bad as THAT dumb shit"
 thestringpuller: mircea_popescu was right. this hard-fork thing forced 
hearn out of bitcoin
 mircea_popescu: i suspect the google hiring of turds a la 
hearn and a whole raft of others to be specifically intetional.