tmsr - Search: strings

700+ entries in 0.556s

mod6: Basically when working with Strings.Fixed I end up making arrays (of fixed size) of strings (of fixed size), need to use caution always to not continue to iterate if the string at a given index is filled with ' '.

mircea_popescu: (dogegoin, which "still exists" has a "market cap" of whatever, >100mn, according to the websites printing arbitrary values next to text strings ; similarily myspace.com is worth $70 mn according to "Worth Of Web Calculator - World's #1 Website Value Calculator")

mod6: Ada Field Report: 1) Perl is fast. 2) Working with Strings.Fixed, oofda. 3) Verify Seals works!

asciilifeform: the basic sin in strings is same as in microshit and elsewhere: rejection of parsimony

asciilifeform: i am not convinced of there being involvement of 'things' : strings have not even the reality anchor of phlogiston.

asciilifeform: phf: string insert is O(N) troo!! but i can't escape the notion that if you're manually inserting INSIDE multi-GB strings, Something Is Wrong with yer process

asciilifeform: 'ropes' text not only replaces O(1) ops with O(log n), but introduces pointerism and the inevitable overflow ( when implemented, as all unixen are, in overflowlang ) and thus possibility of ill-formed structures , whereas ALL conventional strings are well-formed at birth

asciilifeform: presently EVERYBODY is 'representing strings as flat array', but some folx are lying to themselves about it

barpub: if you're stuck representing strings as flat arrays, yes, o(n)ism is a necessity

mircea_popescu: asciilifeform well yes, because the free strings they can get hands on were written in 1980 by gosplan as quoted, rather than in 2000 by perianne boring aspie

mircea_popescu: oin chain. on the basis of these mystery strings, OTHER PARTIES, which ARE IN NO WAY BOUND TO THIS, alloocate wholly imaginary bitcoins to the sort of imbeciles who buy into this scheme (always and everywhere, the stupid poor. to them it makes sense, they've nothingh to lose anyway)

mircea_popescu: let's drop the math for a moment and delve. at time t0, bitcoin works. at time t1, some wreckers under "public pressure" as discussed well in http://trilema.com/2013/digging-through-archives-yields-gold/ attempt to attack this bitcoin that works, by producing an alt-bitcoin, that does not work. the specific way in which the alt-bitcoin thatr does not work "works" is by deeding (exactly like deedbot) some strings into the bitc

trinque: hanbot: it is indeed expecting to see its own nick come back in those strings.

mircea_popescu: "To put the matter in simple terms : next time you get a "black chix code" itch and feel like vomiting your idiocy in the shape of "patches" and "code submissions", seriously consider writing strings on your tits instead. It's infinitely easier to clean up, and it ends up costing us less money! This is what true ecology is all about, ye ken ?"

mircea_popescu: you can construct reference strings for any failure count you wish.

mircea_popescu: http://btcbase.org/log/2017-08-21#1701627 << problem is poverty of mind, not of system. "i don't want to look at large hex strings, they intimidatre me". same exact shit-for-brains that gave us pgp "fingerprints". ☝︎

mircea_popescu: PeterL + padlen = min(keya.l, keyb.l) - 1 # make sure that the strings will not overflow the key mods << i don't get it, why do you have variable length keys ?

asciilifeform: ''When RSA is the underlying primitive, something even more is known: that the ability to forge with resources R in an attack which does not exploit some structural characteristic of the MGF implies the ability to invert RSA on random strings using computational resources only slightly greater than R.''

mircea_popescu: basically it takes a random string, jumbles it with the original message, and spits out two halves. the hope with it is that it provides all-or-nothing security, in the sense that to recover any bit of the message you need to correctly process the entire pair of jumbled strings.

mircea_popescu: not a matter of price, a matter of all the strings. gotta keep it maintained, tank full, etc. you realise 50% of all arguments among car using negros is "who left the tank empty" ?

mircea_popescu: half the time even copied random strings in.

asciilifeform: that'd mean 'shuffling the human strings' necessarily.

asciilifeform: lol, as in basic interpreter, actually moving the fucking humanreadable strings around ?

mircea_popescu: not like bruce dickinson is taking out google ads on "justin bieber" search strings, is he now.

a111: Logged on 2017-07-15 16:57 asciilifeform: if i start writing english as strings of 16-bit indices into the oxford dictionary, people will laugh.

erlehmann: also, comparing two strings should be done bytewise, always. everything else is madness.

jurov: "incorporating something in unicode does not increase processing complexity" orly? maybe unless you want to do anything interesting with the text, like... count the characters. or case convert. or detect whitespace. or compare two strings. or...

asciilifeform: if i start writing english as strings of 16-bit indices into the oxford dictionary, people will laugh. ☟︎☟︎

phf: i thought it would be kind of cool if bots could sling signed lisp strings in privmessages, 0ldsch001 scenetech!

ben_vulpes: uniform strings; still setting all this machinery up

ben_vulpes: http://btcbase.org/log/2017-07-02#1678507 << "bit-smasher"? came in from ql just fine for me. i only use it as a crutch to beat strings into bit-vectors. ☝︎

Framedragger: (in fact maybe that's an important point as well: lighthouse shits at a fixed rate; there is a discrete amount of auth strings which can be used. i guess this is obvious, i'm slow)

Framedragger: situation is different if the point is for peer A to newly introduce self to B. then (sina) "unpredictable lighthouse" is important because it sets a limit to how many auth strings can be used.

Framedragger: let me recall why that is super important lol; but the unpredictability of the auth strings coming from lighthouse is important

Framedragger: (btw the challenge strings may be in something else than plaintext, all depends on lighthouse and medium)

Framedragger: yes i think so, and note that there is a time window there re. how recent challenge string has to be, to avoid replay. i.e., those strings expire. and yes that's how you send a msg to B iirc

sina: if I'm operator of peer A and want to send a message to peer B, what do I do? pick one of my stored challenge strings, sign it, send it along with my message?

sina: and nodes are receiving and storing those challenge strings

sina: so we have a lighthouse thingo broadcasting some random bytes as challenge strings in plaintext

Framedragger: ("well ok, let me generate this one just for you, and this for just for you", vs. "i'll generate this many auth strings per time unit, and distribute them to this set of destinations (or "shit them out via radio"))

Framedragger: the point is that auth strings are sent regardless of whether the connecting peer (A) wants them

Framedragger: "in all directions" depends on medium. in radio, it's clear; in packet switched networks, could be a list of broadcast addresses to send auth strings to (constantly), etc

Framedragger: note the important aspect which lighthouse introduces: constant stream of auth strings, "in all directions"

sina: "Unsolicited challenge strings will also be sent, at intervals and to destinations specified by the operator."

sina: just going through those comments again trinque, e.g. http://trilema.com/2016/gossipd-design-document/#comment-119015 "One possible cut of the Gordian Knot re: my "enemy's ability to trigger a response from a suspected-node on demand" would be for every node to have a "lighthouse" - an always-on broadcaster of authentication challenge strings." per the spec I will be implementing this

BingoBoingo: <mircea_popescu> "the price of two strings tied to one can goes up to bla bla" ? << Nah, this is rising cost of tin solder driving higher price of toucans

mircea_popescu: "the price of two strings tied to one can goes up to bla bla" ?

ben_vulpes: augh more strings

mircea_popescu: sina pick random strings, announce the results, then we do candi and se

ben_vulpes: you missed the strings thread, didntcha

ben_vulpes: sina: gosh i'd have to do real work, turn strings into binary

mircea_popescu: python, it wants strings

mircea_popescu: but yes, this will be the enduring legacy of the ustardian "culture", such as it is : a really large attempt to calculate the sum-value of strings of words. because "the alternative is hard" and besides "this kinda works".

mircea_popescu: the workings of spam being exactly this "there exist idiots / old people dumb enough to parse strings from $nobody"

mircea_popescu: the funny part being they actually believe their inane shit. "oh, if i type $string then it'll be parsed by all-comers as such! oh and i don't have to parse any strings myself!"

mircea_popescu: why the fuck can't i add the string 68 with the numeral 7 to get the real 74.99999999 as god intended ? it's ALL STRINGS YES ?

mircea_popescu: ah but mod6 baby, you can't sign html and expect to verify the text a browser outputs cmon. whole fucking thing is a substitution engine for strings, how's the clearsign gonna be preserved.

mircea_popescu: nah, ~same as php. processes strings to spit out on a gui.

pete_dushenski: the cny/usd-btc spread has also grown by 6% in the last 24hrs. pboc pulling strings again ?

mircea_popescu: Framedragger why exactly is scriba reacting to non !$ strings ? eh ?

mircea_popescu: a superficial cat | strings | grep yielded a bunch of old stuff so it doesn't appear dataloss is guaranteed.

a111: Logged on 2017-04-06 02:27 mircea_popescu: asciilifeform lulz of all time : you can get further victims AS THEY ARE INDEXED BY GOOGLE through for instance searching for "800-00038-r08" or such strings. you get a very lulzy welcome if selecting eg "deutshc" : everything's "translation missing"

mircea_popescu: asciilifeform lulz of all time : you can get further victims AS THEY ARE INDEXED BY GOOGLE through for instance searching for "800-00038-r08" or such strings. you get a very lulzy welcome if selecting eg "deutshc" : everything's "translation missing" ☟︎

asciilifeform: can't say i've ever seen a jam that looks like 'long strings of cars going exactly the same speed'

danielpbarron: there is traffic on highways because women think it exists for them to set cruise control in whichever lane they happen to end up, and then play games on their phone until they get to work, which results in long strings of cars going exactly the same speed, which results in congestion when even a single similarly slow car tries to pass the clog.

mircea_popescu: btw, the usg is out in force advertising its ersatz bitcoin. "etoro" taking out google advertising on my own name (no doubt along million other strings) and so on.

asciilifeform: but in table system, you don't even need to munge indices into strings to make paths with

mircea_popescu: i imagine he's now going to spend a pleasant half hour seing various alphanumeric strings on assorted parts.

mircea_popescu: there is no sane way to lay claim of ownership to random strings

mircea_popescu: suppose i think of it as random strings.

asciilifeform: and yes you can compute the odds of a particular block B ending up wholly lubyized by a time T. however if you rely on the luby strings for your mining, you will be fucked timewise.

asciilifeform: there's a difference between 'mostly' and 'actually no strings'

mircea_popescu: cunt's always given away "mosty for free" "with no strings attached". hurr durr, not how it works.

asciilifeform: (if i landed, a martian, on earth, and found that almost all beer is given out for free and with 0 strings attached - i would infer that beer is a type of industrial waste..)

deedbot: http://thestringpuller.com/2017/02/simple-blender-2-66-cal3d/ << Pull Your Own Strings - Simple Blender 2.66 -> Cal3d

asciilifeform: mats: it is a little disappointing, apparently not fully general collision, but only works on strings having a certain structure

a111: Logged on 2015-02-16 06:17 asciilifeform: so the 'google finds unique strings' thing, sure - can we conclude that i'm the only one alive trying to build 'gnat' on 'gentoo' ?

asciilifeform: 'The read-only files uuid and boot_id contain random strings like 6fd5a44b-35f4-4ad4-a9b9-6b9be13e1fe9. The former is generated afresh for each read, the latter was generated once.' << what is the theoretically legitimate use for this ?

ben_vulpes: "hi i have a rudimentary understanding that some words related to mathematics exist and have spent too much time glomming strings together. please kill me!"

asciilifeform: (not mega-discovery, and not my original observation) nobody strings up officials while store shelves are full.

deedbot: http://thestringpuller.com/2017/01/now-go-and-get-your-money-lil-duffle-bag-boy/ << Pull Your Own Strings - Now Go and Get Your Money Lil Duffle Bag Boy

mircea_popescu: ok so then. stop using strings for concepts. what do you mean by "public good" ?

asciilifeform: ^ actually a discussion of cl strings!

asciilifeform: (piece was not about strings, but another 'need' vs 'want', but otherwise very similar idea)

mircea_popescu: cue ballas with his "there's a difference between what you need and what you want, and the media will relentlessly give you strings"

davout: strings defined as byte vectors is pretty unambiguous

mircea_popescu: well, a large part of the problem is that strings aren't something.

asciilifeform: phf: understand also, postgres can't store bignums as such, it stores strings

asciilifeform: 0 anything resembling human strings in there, either.

ben_vulpes: chinese moms control the purse strings

ben_vulpes: mats: does 'mommy' typically hold the purse strings among yr people?

asciilifeform: iirc somebody sells electric guitar now that is just a stick with painted-on 'strings', and a comp

phf: been (if (not (hashed-path-hash c)) ...) because you ~reader~ should've already massaged it all into the kind of data computers understand. btcbase uses nil for empty hashes, you could have :empty or whatever, but certainly not carying strings and dictionaries all over the place.

phf: the main folly are the unixisms all over the place. lisp works with a clear read/eval/print cycle. read means that you want to take outside input and convert it into a concrete data structure. so you shouldn't have a hash with strings in it. things like (string= "false" (gethash 'hash c)) should not happen so far down the call chain. your ~reader~ should convert the input data into a format that's easy to work with. the check could've

phf: also you don't want to concatenate paths, because that's how you end up losing separators and getting injection attacks and such. (merge-pathnames ...) will still work on strings, but will do the right thing

mircea_popescu: lmao no moare random strings hanbot , we get it.

asciilifeform: it has a net effect in that it a) takes up space between non-'neutral' strings b) if enemy misguesses even 1 bit inside it, it becomes quite non-neutral, and cumulatively

mircea_popescu: and other strings are also just as neutral.

mircea_popescu: in any case, "-if + for" is NOT the same thing wherever it appears. even if the strings are equal.