66 entries in 0.572s
a111: Logged on 2018-10-09 16:31 phf: i had expiration set on it, which i finally removed for good. the thinking at the time was that i didn't really trust my opsec (mac was still in the loop), but it wasn't much of thinking since the mechanism is
promisetronic anyway. i also took an opportunity to clean it up off extra "identities" and random signatures
phf: i had expiration set on it, which i finally removed for good. the thinking at the time was that i didn't really trust my opsec (mac was still in the loop), but it wasn't much of thinking since the mechanism is
promisetronic anyway. i also took an opportunity to clean it up off extra "identities" and random signatures
☟︎ trinque: I agree,
promisetronic without the vtron getting angry at you over mismatched name
shinohai: If there are currently no vps boxxen to sell, cannot exactly sell anything besides
promisetronic mircea_popescu: asciilifeform and fucking is also intrinsically
promisetronic. so what of it ? most of the things we do and enjoy are founded onm promise.
Framedragger: almost as if the thing would need to wait and then send a challenge to that same nick, but this is kinda
promisetronic i guess.
phf: unrelatedly i was wondering if gpg passwords are
promisetronic. how do they even work? there's some symmetric encryption scheme used to encrypt the privkey, or can passwords be somehow integrated into rsa scheme?
mircea_popescu: ben_vulpes iffy, too
promisetronic will cause a bunch of hurt fingers.
phf: fwiw patch format is super
promisetronic. it's something along the lines of "command that was used to produce the hunks\nhunks..."
a111: Logged on 2016-11-23 16:18 asciilifeform: global indices of 'memorable' names, or 'safely' shortened rsa pubkeys, are
promisetronic.
mircea_popescu: now, there's entirely nothing "
promisetronic" about people providing seals named as their patches are named. if they fail to do this - their patch won't work.
ben_vulpes: look i'm pointing at a
promisetronic bit of v and saying "hey look i think this is a bit floppy"
ben_vulpes: it costs in complexity, yes. could be argued that it is a very minimal cost, but i would still prefer to "pick any signature from .seals that verifies" instead of the by my read
promisetronic "pick any signature whose filename contains the filename of the patch under verification"
phf: actually
promisetronic to the max, since you don't even have to surrender the photo. something about the Polaroid part implies that you're not live streaming it to pornhub
mircea_popescu: "
promisetronic" in the sense of "not rippletronic/ethereumtronic/etc" is a good thing.
Framedragger: hmm. i mean, sure, it just.. seems awfully
promisetronic, to peruse local lingo.
mircea_popescu: ie, the back button itself is
promisetronic as implemented by browsers. "almost like lisp!"
trinque: my perspective is that the field is
promisetronic in exactly the same manner as nlocktime