70 entries in 0.512s
a111: Logged on 2019-01-20 19:59 asciilifeform: a fast
rsatron is important mainly in light of fast rejection of crapola sent by enemy, rather than for payload per se.
mircea_popescu: bitcoin rly should come standard in cuntoo anyway. alongside proper
rsatron and proper dbtron/webserver.
amberglint: perhaps the
rsatron will fit into this larger chip?
mircea_popescu: phf we've all ranted about it at some time or another. needless to say replacement
rsatron does not include idiotic half-baked state machines. much like trb-i doesn't include "accounts" nonsense.
mircea_popescu: but my point is -- by the time this iron actually signs, this iron actually also manages signatures, and therefore this iron actually is a
rsatron.
a111: Logged on 2018-02-25 21:49 trinque: somebody gimme a better
rsatron and I'll use that instead.
trinque: somebody gimme a better
rsatron and I'll use that instead.
☟︎ diana_coman:
http://btcbase.org/log/2017-11-14#1737414 <- confirmed; I do NOT use any nextprime or other "rng"-parts from gpg; current
rsatron prototype simply grabs nbits from fg, flips the 2 top bits and 1 bottom bit as per previous discussion and then checks if result is prime; if prime then keep, otherwise discard and try again; no "add 2 until prime" or other such thing
☝︎ a111: Logged on 2017-10-19 01:28 trinque: when there's a republican
rsatron, I'll immediately be moving deedbot to that.
trinque: when there's a republican
rsatron, I'll immediately be moving deedbot to that.
☟︎ mircea_popescu: yeah well. there's no ~= in this arithmetic. if
rsatron has been in production for a while and functioning correctly we can revisit these.
mircea_popescu: otherwise why implement a ptron rather than simply a
rsatron.
mircea_popescu: and incidentally, pss should prolly be in the final tmsr-
rsatron huh.
mod6: <+asciilifeform> which, btw, imho is intrinsically unsuitable for a fits-in-head
rsatron, it is extremely gnarly and uses float approximations that get magically unfudged back to int, etc << ugh. right.
a111: Logged on 2017-06-17 19:45 asciilifeform: hypothetically i could even do it ( supposing your
rsatron is mains-powered ) by observing the imperceptible dimming of the room lights, from 5km away
mircea_popescu: smart thing would be to replace it with a proper
rsatron mircea_popescu: i dunno, i have no actual math to show, but intuitively it seems to me the above "take 64 bytes of rng, iterate hash over the first 60 last 4-times and then use that as tape to pad message, then put padded message + 64 bytes in question in
rsatron" is practically useful and theoretically strong.
a111: Logged on 2016-11-03 03:12 asciilifeform: ftr i am not making mechanical
rsatron.
a111: Logged on 2016-11-03 03:12 asciilifeform: ftr i am not making mechanical
rsatron.