514 entries in 0.669s
trinque: phf: the gentoo
musl overlay has sbcl patches iirc. gotta forgo threads
phf: did anybody do a
musl sbcl? i have a
musl cmucl in the backlog, but way down the list (perhaps once i get this x60 going)
a111: Logged on 2017-01-19 15:55 trinque: I built on
musl lots of times before
trinque: I built on
musl lots of times before
☟︎ a111: Logged on 2017-01-07 20:48 mircea_popescu: anyway, entertaining the thing as you describe at face value : if indeed your concern is a sort of bastardization as conceptually constructible from the foregoing, then the correct move is to build your masamune on
musl and attach a license that forbids the empire (such as for instance the trb license ; or else one stating to use must be in l2, or rated by you, or any such thing). this will mostly protect you both technically
mircea_popescu: might be ~same as the above
musl, i suppose on a curated gentoo.
mircea_popescu: anyway, entertaining the thing as you describe at face value : if indeed your concern is a sort of bastardization as conceptually constructible from the foregoing, then the correct move is to build your masamune on
musl and attach a license that forbids the empire (such as for instance the trb license ; or else one stating to use must be in l2, or rated by you, or any such thing). this will mostly protect you both technically
☟︎ a111: Logged on 2017-01-07 17:49 mircea_popescu: anyway, i'm not entirely up to speed re sad state of lisp world. i expect it's in the shitter, but not exactly clear how. is there any merit to the nude assertion that "lisp is a shittier thing than trb, because trb at least has SOMETHING that can be made into a
musl ; whereas lisp does not" ?
mircea_popescu: anyway, i'm not entirely up to speed re sad state of lisp world. i expect it's in the shitter, but not exactly clear how. is there any merit to the nude assertion that "lisp is a shittier thing than trb, because trb at least has SOMETHING that can be made into a
musl ; whereas lisp does not" ?
☟︎ phf: there's a pure
musl gentoo build
trinque: asciilifeform: yeah, when I run my gentoo recipe, it's usually
musl unless I actually need the glibc turd for something
trinque: I last built my
musl recipe in jan, worked fine
trinque: asciilifeform: they broke
musl mod6: the two .sh scripts you have in there can be integrated into the makefiles directly i think. however, we'll still need the openssl-004-
musl-termios.patch and rotor_buildroot_dot_config
trinque: I'm over here trying to get sbcl's sb-bsd-socket to build on
musl trinque: anybody built sbcl on
musl?
assbot: Logged on 20-03-2016 15:02:08; phf: asciilifeform: did you manage to get emacs to build on
musl gentoo? (i.e. does the
musl patches overlay include a solution for temacs dump process)
phf: asciilifeform: did you manage to get emacs to build on
musl gentoo? (i.e. does the
musl patches overlay include a solution for temacs dump process)
☟︎ phf: it's a bit down the pipeline for me. there were some attempts to make cmucl go entirely syscall, but as it stands it's probably 40% there. i want to link it to
musl first, and then play around with control interfaces uses curses/cl-charm, which is when i'll test out this thing
assbot: GitHub - sabotage-linux/netbsd-curses: libcurses and dependencies taken from netbsd and brought into a portable (at least to
musl) shape ... (
http://bit.ly/1QAhUAm )
mircea_popescu: and buildroot with
musl prevented us from bathing in the same humiliation EVERYONE else ended up in with the recent gethostbyaddr thing
ben_vulpes: here's the last line, asciilifeform: x86_64-therealbitcoin-linux-
musl-gcc: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program cc1)
BingoBoingo: In other marginal news: Docker, employer of the late Debian Founder, has now hired the Alpine Linux founder and is moving all their images to that. Might be relevant if anyone was looking at that
musl based distro
BingoBoingo: So, I'm thinking about returning to linux... maybe. Any idea if RadeonSI drivers would work on a
musl kernel?
assbot: Logged on 17-01-2016 20:54:44; mod6: instead, just pulled the source and built inside the rotor so it would be built with the gcc/
musl that comes with buildroot
mod6: that way i can actually debug my bitcoind with
musl symbols etc.
mod6: instead, just pulled the source and built inside the rotor so it would be built with the gcc/
musl that comes with buildroot
☟︎ jurov: x86_64-therealbitcoin-linux-
musl-gcc: error: unrecognized command line option '-V' << this
mod6: guruvan: yeah, i guess that buildroot must hvae used 4.8.4 to build the 4.9.x with
musl that buildroot uses.
guruvan: oic - I didn't notice the
musl libc - I've not built one of those yet - but - did you write a whole profile for it?
mod6: CC='/mnt/btc-dev/rotor/toolchain/usr/bin/x86_64-therealbitcoin-linux-
musl-gcc'
mircea_popescu: yup there's
musl too. aaaite, ima let it be for a bit then
assbot: Logged on 20-12-2015 00:17:11; asciilifeform: incidentally, gentlemen, please welcome (back) dulap! 46.166.165.30:8333 (nosuchlabs.com), a trb node running bleedingedge-asciilifeform+rotor(
musl)
mircea_popescu: i dun believe this is what they wanted
musl to be for.
trinque: does this require a
musl patch? does this ...
trinque: I've changed it since to dump out a working
musl system
mod6: was a gentoo/glibc environement -- compiled buildroot with the
musl settings. didn't change anything to the "rotor" steps execept for adding the change to BDB configure options in trinque's message.
trinque: yep, but could just as well be
musl ascii_field: not, afaik, affiliated with the
musl folks in any direct sense
jurov:
musl is alternative libc
assbot: Logged on 29-07-2015 15:55:28; phf: i remember,
musl is pretty cool, it's part of the whole suckless movement
phf: i remember,
musl is pretty cool, it's part of the whole suckless movement
☟︎ ben_vulpes: ascii_field: what's the difference between
musl and glibc?
ascii_field: can't use glibc toolchain to build binaries with
musl shinohai: I haven't yet ascii_field, I am still doing the required reading. (
musl doesn't work for me)
mod6: <+punkman> did anyone try
musl yet? << yeah, check out ascii's comments from yesterday
ben_vulpes: neat to hear about
musl, asciilifeform
ascii_field: point is not only to test pogo build and get
musl in, but also it is useful to have a rom-able pc realbitcoinotron
ascii_field: mod6, ben_vulpes, mircea_popescu, et al: sooo in other nyooz, last night i got a x86_64 buildroot on
musl going. shits out a bootable iso
mod6: haven't tried
musl yet no.
ascii_field: realize, i don't have a better solution than ntp. but it has to be done sanely (no dns; builds under
musl or uclibc; doesn't introduce more than a few dozen lines of code; and picks from $bigint ip on powerup; and sanity-checked from blockchain )
assbot: Logged on 05-07-2015 08:22:23; mircea_popescu: heh check it out, mark karpeles idling in #
musl.
mod6: and if that doesn't work, maybe I can give 'hardened/linux/
musl/amd64' (i don't see a non-hardened one available atm)
mod6: i saw that comment yesterday, I briefly looked at it's page ascii_field, I'll take a deeper look at
musl soon. hopefully that'll get us further?
ascii_field: presently i suspect that '
musl' is the only glibc replacement that has any promise