log☇︎
2000+ entries in 0.245s
asciilifeform: https://github.com/hanshuebner/vlm/blob/master/admin/Beta-test-customers.text << lenat!!!
asciilifeform: maybe test the hypothesis re the obedient gurls
Framedragger: vim tips (https://wikileaks.org/ciav7p1/cms/page_3375350.html) and unit test guidelines (SECRET//NOFORN!!!1) https://wikileaks.org/ciav7p1/cms/page_11629048.html
mircea_popescu: it's not exactly a common condition, this ; which is both why i said something and why it wasn't noticed. simply no test for ~this~ never seen before nonsense
asciilifeform: incidentally it'd also test trinque's 'miners out in the open' thing. miner who comes out of the curtains, could collect 100% of the fee, rather than what relays left behind
trinque: miner wants the chicks, yet I'm supposed to STD test them for him
mircea_popescu: as per your 5k / 5 years tantalum test
asciilifeform: it fails 'berlin wall test'
asciilifeform: (test of heat sink, perhaps. but 0 else.)
trinque: eh the test.test.local was just me leaving turds in /etc/hosts
asciilifeform: i also have a test going where :
mod6: yeah, good call. should be easy enough to drop em in and test 'em.
shinohai: Not bad here, you? Hopefully I can get time this afternoon to add asciilifeform 's newest goodies and test
mircea_popescu: girls engage in this sort of fatty grooming as a shit test. if you agree with her that her fat friend also deserves "a life" aka someone to pay for her children, perhaps you should.
asciilifeform: third item to test : two or more wires.
shinohai: ty asciilifeform .... will test this afternoon
asciilifeform: trinque: two main things to test, afaik: 1) reconnects (let it connect, then temporarily ban ip in iptables on the other side; see how long it takes to reconnect) and 2 ) bidirectional wires, two nodes 'wired to' one another, same, in each direction.
trinque: later today I will test
asciilifeform: oh mircea_popescu , ben_vulpes , mod6 , et al : the wires patch has a mistake, it fails to reconnect; please do not waste time to test it until fixed.
shinohai: Lots of irons in fires atm, but exciting development asciilifeform .... I will test in < 24 hrs
asciilifeform: other folx ( particularly mircea_popescu ) may also be interested in tx propagation, but i am unequipped to test this.
hanbot: test tx via trb using sendtoaddress fails to send diddly squat, meanwhile @ blockchain.info: transaction rejected by our node. Reason:Script resulted in a non-true stack: []
trinque: I'm going to aim the deeds service at #trilema-trinque for a few minutes to test.
mod6: my test node gets bh'd all the time, still responds to rpc commands. i typically do the samething, stop. wait a bit, restart.
phf: http://btcbase.org/log/2017-02-10#1612714 << is handy, but i can't bring myself to replacing safety critical ssh with it. i've had plenty of opportunity to test it though, and it's best option for when you're trying to connect to server over a public wifi running over cell network off a generator ☝︎
shinohai: It isn't bad really. You can test drive in a chroot until you have time to build actual kernel.
asciilifeform: this is why i did not make FUCKGOATS a usb device in the usual sense. and did not give it any 'test mode command' or in fact any way to manipulate its state from the connected comp at all.
mircea_popescu: the test of existence is v ; not "the world".
asciilifeform: '-- soldiers, at attention! now hear the order of the day for our unit: Secret. Order No. 136, via the chain of command, field post N 97..., city of kabul. recently this unit has seen an uptick in the careless handling of weapons. in order to reduce these incidents and to prevent further unsanctioned discharges, i order: during the receipt and handoff by sgnt. Bankin A. N. of his sidearm, the test-decock for the verification of the a
ben_vulpes: in turing test inversions: https://medium.com/@NoraReed/the-saga-of-christianmom18-8ac09ceab9c6#.tr0yew72q
a111: Logged on 2017-01-30 19:05 asciilifeform bought a set, will test and post result.
Framedragger: yes, *some*. but not enough automation, apparently; and not enough falsification in this case, as is very much apparent :/ should have been an obvious catch by either automated test or at least manual test. was (very shamefully) a wee bit too lazy with this last command.
mircea_popescu: the test MAY NOT BE > 0 (or -1 ?) and < 0x10000000000000000. if the compiler does that the compiler is very, very stupid.
mircea_popescu: that is the test. all of it is representable.
mircea_popescu: the range is 0 to 0xfffffffffffffff. the test is >= 0 and <= 0xfffffffffffffff.
mircea_popescu: the range is 0 to 0xfffffffffffffff. the test is >=
asciilifeform: (ever see the test boxes the scanner vendors include ? they're more or less this, iron box with battery, wires, mercury switch...)
asciilifeform: (most elementary test: place pnojes, and other small but reasonably powerful rf-emitting gadgets inside, and try and connect to'em)
asciilifeform bought a set, will test and post result. ☟︎
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform ah, no, i did test it. the converter is cheap, which means cheap. low q optics.
asciilifeform: ^ anyone test this particular part ?
asciilifeform: gabriel_laddel_p: you can test this with bare hands. a metamaterial for long waves is also known as... ordinary waveguide. chandra bose made these in 1890s!
Reuel: Ignore my test, also, have you guys automated the login process with the OTP etc?
diana_coman: as to the trouble there: it's more than a concern - it invalidates your "test"
diana_coman: Reuel, let me see if I get this straight: you want to implement a "small" scale model of democracy in order to test whether it works; at the same time, you propose to implement it on a model of reality that is purposefully broken because..."scope is too small for it to matter"?
asciilifeform: ben_vulpes: i am all for moving the miner to own binary. BUT you would then have to test it and somehow demonstrate that it in fact behaves IDENTICALLY to the original
asciilifeform: davout: provide sane endpoints. i promise to read patch, and test, and help.
asciilifeform: in other lulz: https://archive.is/THGQG >> 'Asked whether a missile had mis-fired, she said she was not going to get into "operational details" and would not say whether Mrs May had been told this. Questioned by the BBC's Andrew Marr on Sunday, Prime Minister Theresa May refused four times to say whether she had known about the test firing ahead of the vote. ... "There is a convention that we don't talk about the deterrent... because
a111: Logged on 2017-01-19 17:16 asciilifeform: !~later tell trinque re: http://btcbase.org/log/2017-01-19#1605086 >> plz consider posting recipe for musltronic emacs build! i promise to test.
asciilifeform: !~later tell trinque re: http://btcbase.org/log/2017-01-19#1605086 >> plz consider posting recipe for musltronic emacs build! i promise to test. ☝︎☟︎
mircea_popescu: i can 60% a 4-choice test on any topic in klingon.
phf: the whole point of "no child left" is to skew literacy rates through standardized multiple choice. "by the end of this course you will recognize the words dog, cat and food. this will also be in the test"
mod6: You see, when I've tested this in a single edge graph system -- a simple test vpatch set, this problem doesn't occur. a->b->c->d->e, remove 'c', and you just have a->b -- my current implemntation does this fine.
mod6: I've created some new tests and all of which have been looking good. But then I noticed what seems like a problem on the last, new test, to implement. In fact, it was the last step of the last new test.
deedbot: http://phuctor.nosuchlabs.com/gpgkey/0A8E8A26D309CBC4A73BD31E3D6C6AE49AB443FA58E2A9A823BAA868189AB6A5 << Recent Phuctorings. - Phuctored: 3144049966902983307992043926250229373879354153744005809459530137206463797044500469856028602948243964811501385303514531460753546914515064469551268070615023 divides RSA Moduli belonging to 'FAKE: key generation test; '
mod6: i actually kinda wanna test this guy out
asciilifeform: what can i say, i'll happily test the new ver.
asciilifeform: never work, but then you’d test it and it would be 94% accurate, and the branches would wake up the next morning and read their newspapers and the headlines would say OUR WORLD HAS BEEN SET ON FIRE. You’d give your buddy a high-five and go celebrate at the bar, and then you’d think, “I wonder if we can make branch predictors even more accurate,” and the next day you’d start XOR’ing the branch’s PC address with a shift
asciilifeform: it is physical reality, and ergo by definition no moar 'insane' than gravity. unless mircea_popescu offers a breakthrough where we can test doublespendity without keeping blockchain around at all
asciilifeform: i historically refused to touch the miner, and will not encourage anyone to touch it, because neither i nor anyone i know is equipped to properly test the result.
asciilifeform: you gotta test it, when you buy
pete_dushenski: in other news, "In this article World Bank poverty estimates are used to systematically test the relationship between changes in poverty and exogenous changes in real domestic food prices. We uncover indicative evidence that increases in food prices are associated with reductions in poverty, not increases."
mircea_popescu: and on the other hand, "the number four told me to headbutt a door!". really, it did ? i suppose, perhaps, if the number four is followed by a double-sifr and occurs on your blood test result sheet right where the locals wrote "glucemia" it may be said "the number four told me to stop eating icecream", but it is rather forcing the point.
Framedragger: http://btcbase.org/log/2016-12-31#1594781 << hmm. what i could do is, check that all generated gpg keys have the right e and N (by comparing to the e,N,IP CSVs that i fully trust); to make sure that i didn't mess up the gpg-generation thing. i don't think it'd be really possible, and i had done some manual checks before, but maybe worth to write an automated full-on test. ☝︎
deedbot: http://phuctor.nosuchlabs.com/gpgkey/0A8E8A26D309CBC4A73BD31E3D6C6AE49AB443FA58E2A9A823BAA868189AB6A5 << Recent Phuctorings. - Phuctored: 3 divides RSA Moduli belonging to 'FAKE: key generation test; ' (host-21-153-102-62.net.admmax.net. Unknown)
mod6: Update: Cleanup, and construction of new automated tests to provide functional test coverage for V-99994 is now underway.
mod6: <+davout> mod6: i think it would actually be the least painful part to test << anyway, i hope so. im sure there will be more discussion in coming months.
ben_vulpes: http://btc.yt/lxr/satoshi/source/src/test/transaction_tests.cpp?v=makefiles#0004
ben_vulpes: mod6: "test[ing] this" is actually how i got on the alpha centauri miner quest
davout: mod6: i think it would actually be the least painful part to test
mod6: and am going to try to build tools, if needed, to help test this.
ben_vulpes: what's an insane input that breaks the shortest common substring test?
ben_vulpes: would a smallest common substring test suffice here?
ben_vulpes: standby, let me test a third approach
ben_vulpes: if you don't bottom it out it's not a proper test drive
mircea_popescu: moreover, it's a fine lithmus test : doesn't know of phuctor by now, isn't actually involved.
asciilifeform: one of the hidden evils of 'of course generating key takes 10 minutes!' traditional entropy starvation -- is that nobody expects to be able to do the test where you generate 10 billion keys and make sure that the resulting keys have gcd of 1
a111: Logged on 2016-12-28 01:58 phf: also as a rule you don't really want to let string output streams escape their scope. they don't have standard type (one cmucl it's lisp::string-output-stream for example), so you can't test for it, and for all intents and purposes they act as incomplete builders: you can't do anything with them except get their value, so why not get value there and then?
phf: also as a rule you don't really want to let string output streams escape their scope. they don't have standard type (one cmucl it's lisp::string-output-stream for example), so you can't test for it, and for all intents and purposes they act as incomplete builders: you can't do anything with them except get their value, so why not get value there and then? ☟︎
asciilifeform: author did not do elementary smoke test, or wat.
mod6: and when I do that above test ^, i never hit this line: death("Cyclic Graph!\n");
mod6: im not sure if i follow. are you saying that genesis isn't a good place to test it because it is a root?
mod6: asciilifeform: hey, say I wanted to test my toposort...
asciilifeform: i posted this as a litmus test of sorts, for vtrons.
mod6: yea, a solid test.
mod6: yah, so, in this: a->b->c->d ; I basically just got rid of 'c', and then tried to press a->b->d (all signed by x) and it does fail. was this what we were trying to achieve? If not, i'll do another test np.
mod6: mircea_popescu: this is a solid point for testing, let me give this a test and see how it goes. will report.
mod6: http://www.mod6.net/v-99994-test/v99994.vpatch
asciilifeform: stress test for a111!11111
trinque: ben_vulpes: wooo! I'll test that soon as I have coffee in hand.
mircea_popescu: ben_vulpes the bright idea was http://btcbase.org/log/2016-06-13#1481832 and the test needed is to check wtf happens if you symlink the txn to the block tree ☝︎
mod6: i think it's fine. you make a testkey, you sign your test vpatches, you press & test, etc. then we're using encryption everywhere. and we fail fast.
mod6: <+mircea_popescu> there shouldn't be any flag - nor should it press unsigned things. && <+mircea_popescu> with the test key ? why not ? fucks with your workflow ?
deedbot: http://qntra.net/2016/12/ontario-standardized-test-resorts-to-graphite-based-security-measures/ << Qntra - Ontario Standardized Test Resorts To Graphite Based Security Measures
asciilifeform: (and yes, you can have 'test1', 'test2', ... while there is only one 'wild'. but who the hell uses 'wild' for anything other than one-at-a-time test, of own code?!)
asciilifeform: anyway, the behaviour of having 'wild' button with red flip cover , that permits (and at all times, clearly marks, 'WILD') unsigned patches, or mircea_popescu's variant, where you gotta have 'test key' in .wot, are equivalent afaik
trinque: why have that code path present at all? fix patch, apply test patches by hand
mircea_popescu: with the test key ? why not ? fucks with your workflow ?
mod6: I don't think it is reasonable to sign every thing I want to test.
mircea_popescu: better off making a test key and adding it to seals than this