600+ entries in 0.353s
adlai: ;;isup
blockchain.info Xplosionist: Where do you see that on the
blockchain.info page, for my education?
Xplosionist: (
blockchain.info link upcoming, darned internet slowness)
pete_dushenski: danielpbarron o what, like
blockchain.info ? who still lost 5k btc ?
pete_dushenski: "Thanks for not setting a reasonable restriction on transaction fees
blockchain.info!" << "it's all your fault i'm a flaming maroon!"
mircea_popescu: Some of bitcoin's biggest backers, including BitPay,
Blockchain.info, Circle and KnCMiner.com, wrote a letter this week in support of the existing version of bitcoinbut only if it adopts some of the central ideas proposed by the renegade developers, Gavin Andresen and Mike Hearn."
Adlai: !rate asciilifeform -42 still uses
blockchain.info wilbns: growth rate as being something even more rapid and promising than PayPal total payments volume. It was then that I realized there were instances where people were potentially being mislead that the Blockchain total payments volume was actually
Blockchain.info total payments volume.
BingoBoingo: wilbns:
Blockchain.info went rogue soon after they took investment from the wrong crowd. Irreparible now.
wilbns: It's annoying, because there are some good and kind people who work at
Blockchain.info, but there are some "not right" things going on at the top.
mircea_popescu: "A blockchain explorer has ONE JOB: to show its users valid blocks and transactions.
Blockchain.info does not do this. It's worse than worthless; it's deceptive."
shinohai: I remember that abt reused k values and the android snafu for
blockchain.info punkman: "
Blockchain.info is currently down for maintenance. For status updates please see Twitter. Apologies for any inconvenience. "
mircea_popescu: Finally, my question: All of my transactions into the Trezor showed up as confirmed as soon as they got confirmed, however the send transaction (through Coinbase at our donation web sites) took hours to show up as confirmed in the myTrezor wallet even though it had many, many confirmation on
blockchain.info assbot: Logged on 14-07-2015 15:40:48; funkenstein_: for broadcasting a TX today i would recommend
blockchain.info, coinb.in.. there are a few others that will get your tx to miners
jurov: also, what happens when
blockchain.info screws up like recently? how are the tx gonna go to miners?
jurov: lets just submit everything to
blockchain.info and verify their blocks and sleep tight
funkenstein_: for broadcasting a TX today i would recommend
blockchain.info, coinb.in.. there are a few others that will get your tx to miners
☟︎ williamdunne: BingoBoingo: I can't tolerate any of them currently.
Blockchain.info is constantly broken, and all the others have these horrible gaudy interfaces.
BingoBoingo: williamdunne: When piuk rolled out
blockchain.info it was the best block explorer. Once he stopped doing everything it swiftly went to shit and got Andreas'd
williamdunne: It really is remarkable how
blockchain.info didn't go down the goxhole, they just consistently break
decimation: it would be interesting to know how
blockchain.info gets its data
decimation: lol
blockchain.info is still posting 1-size blocks
ascii_field: ... and the node is 2 blocks ahead of '
blockchain.info'
mircea_popescu: also lulzy for all the people using
blockchain.info to validate txn.
mircea_popescu: Bitcoin Core (after 0.10.0) rejects these invalid blocks, but a lot of other stuff doesn't. SPV Bitcoinj wallets do no validation what-so-ever, blindly following the longest chain.
blockchain.info doesn't appear to do validation as well; who knows what else? <<
mircea_popescu: none of my nodes verify the imaginary 737-738
blockchain.info claims to exist.
decimation: it does seem
blockchain.info and insight.bitpay.com have two different chains
assbot: F2Pool is not properly validating blocks, their fork is winning temporarily. SPV clients and
Blockchain.info are inaccurate : Bitcoin ... (
http://bit.ly/1Kzrh5m )
decimation: 5 blocks. 4 are attributed to f2pool, one to antpool by
blockchain.info decimation: go to
blockchain.info and watch the waterfall of txns
decimation: it would be neat if bitcoind could generate the same kinds of stats as
blockchain.info ascii_field: so essentially same thing as a '
blockchain.info' link, l0l