500+ entries in 0.155s
ossabot: Logged on 2020-03-10 19:08:58 lobbes: Instead, I figure why don't I just cut out 2,3,4,5 and instead I just alter my 1) to pull logs from my Postgres database in the same format of your input into your backfill process (which has already been
proven to function to spec)?
lobbes: Instead, I figure why don't I just cut out 2,3,4,5 and instead I just alter my 1) to pull logs from my Postgres database in the same format of your input into your backfill process (which has already been
proven to function to spec)?
jfw: As best I could determine for my
spec, this is an unavoidable consequence of the design of bitcoin transactions. Specifically what's required: address (as an identifier for the private key from a set of multiple; if you just have one then of course this is trivial); txid, output index within that tx, and value,
jfw: 2. I forget if I mentioned it in my
spec but my code shuffles the order of transaction outputs, for obfuscation or general "why not". Is this reasoanble / acceptable?
mircea_popescu: So IMHO it's worth stating in the documentation that some command is expected to have certain flags available, which in the end would lead us to a complete enumeration of system utilities and the functionality they provide, which IMHO would be worth at least as much as the current POSIX
spec. << this btw is eminently a service and likely to produce the way forward.
ossabot: Logged on 2020-02-17 23:08:08 mircea_popescu: i get it, you're a nice fellow and would like for things to be good and work out. nothing wrong with that. you wanna help along with the things, excellent. the prompter's at "get the few who actually seem like they could have something intelligent to say on the topic to comment on the proposed
spec ; an' help mp figure out why they don't apparently naturally want to ; but without going out of what he's doing, s
ossabot: Logged on 2020-02-17 23:07:38 mircea_popescu: one is that the
spec as sketched by me is nowhere near mature enough for implementation in the first place ; it requires some actual looking at and discussion ; some prototyping, some trying out after it's mature before the implementation is actually in a state where anyone'd trust it with anything ; which first anythings will very likely NOT be the changing of how V works around it.
mircea_popescu: i get it, you're a nice fellow and would like for things to be good and work out. nothing wrong with that. you wanna help along with the things, excellent. the prompter's at "get the few who actually seem like they could have something intelligent to say on the topic to comment on the proposed
spec ; an' help mp figure out why they don't apparently naturally want to ; but without going out of what he's doing, such as fo
mircea_popescu: one is that the
spec as sketched by me is nowhere near mature enough for implementation in the first place ; it requires some actual looking at and discussion ; some prototyping, some trying out after it's mature before the implementation is actually in a state where anyone'd trust it with anything ; which first anythings will very likely NOT be the changing of how V works around it.
ossabot: (ossasepia) 2020-01-17 diana_coman: jfw: fyi, I got around to build Gales and it seems to have built fine on a CentOS 6 with gcc 4.9.4; there was just a short wtf moment when the... tar cmd failed; it turns out that the --sort option is available only from tar V 1.28 while my local tar is ... 1.23; I didn't see any version
spec in the prerequisites though probably my CentOS 6 is about as old everything as one gets nowadays
diana_coman: mircea_popescu: hm, thinking now about it, I think there might be, namely the more directly game-relevant parts that are also not yet fully
spec (eg character, structure/item etc); I need to go over it in this light, put the graphics to the side for now and see from there.
jfw opens up the
spec PDF he had lying on HDD, is reminded it's 2500 pages
diana_coman: the
spec doesn't say more than "queue" there.
spyked: well, it doesn't look at comment numbering or anything. also, it doesn't make any distinction between comments and posts, it's just feed entries, as per
the spec lobbes: yeah, no timestamps in orig
spec iirc
spyked bbl, will post feedbot
spec later today
ossabot: Logged on 2019-10-21 06:15:42 mp_en_viaje: the second, which is the hanging matter, is that i meanwhile specced a new functioning of ratings and voicing, the to-
spec execution of which being the very bedrock upon which deedbot payments even work. come april or whatever, i'm not about to do the old style lordship ratings,
ossabot: Logged on 2019-11-06 12:27:30 mircea_popescu: any preferences re
spec ?
spyked: well, I'll ruminate a bit on the whole thing and write a proposal for the bot
spec. should provide a structured starting point at the very least.
spyked: lly not worth supporting the current (very lax) rss
spec. minimally, feed items should contain at least the stuff that's being spat currently in the chans by the bot
ossabot: Logged on 2019-11-02 05:57:45 diana_coman: no mandatory fields huh, what a great... standard! spyked there is though
some description inside the blog spec and possibly that's going to be the actual
spec anyway (maybe iterated if more details are needed)
spyked:
http://logs.ossasepia.com/log/trilema/2019-11-02#1949269 <-- hm, I'd keep that distinct from the bot
spec (which'd
spec bot inputs/outputs and behaviour), but it does bring to light the question of whether feedbot should accept non-mp-wp-style feeds. on one hand I might want to subscribe to heathen feeds on the internets. on the other, the rift is growing anyway (e.g. feedbot doesn't do
https), so it's pro
spyked: okay, I'll post a
spec sometime in the next coupla weeks. guess I didn't post one back in 2018/early 2019 since closest denominator I had was deedbot rss and just used that.
diana_coman: ftr I do enjoy reading otherwise your crisp descriptions there but as they build up, in the end I'll still have to summarise & basically extract a "
spec" out of them.
diana_coman: would help to have ...one
spec, lol; at least it would help me, what can I say.
snsabot: Logged on 2019-10-21 10:15:42 mp_en_viaje: the second, which is the hanging matter, is that i meanwhile specced a new functioning of ratings and voicing, the to-
spec execution of which being the very bedrock upon which deedbot payments even work. come april or whatever, i'm not about to do the old style lordship ratings,
BingoBoingo: "Rechazamos el TCCPC recibido el 22/10/19 y las imputaciones alli realizadas. Asimismo, intimamos pago de pago de precio convenido segun clausula 8 y anexos del contrato marco de servicios de technologia,"... Wank, wank, wank they want paid on a schedule now FASTER than
spec'd in the contract for not doing what they promised in the contract.
BingoBoingo: And he seems to have a motivation to perform to
spec in order to get more business referred to him.
BingoBoingo: Many sectors of the Fat Forehead party are using potato footage in their ads. Can't even
spec spammy blowjob footage quality Xiaomi or Huawei cameras that happen to have radios.
mp_en_viaje: the second, which is the hanging matter, is that i meanwhile specced a new functioning of ratings and voicing, the to-
spec execution of which being the very bedrock upon which deedbot payments even work. come april or whatever, i'm not about to do the old style lordship ratings,
BingoBoingo: Well, how much does a dulap
spec machine run for on the market atm, and are there any indications as to how deep the market is. You did say earlier that they are getting rarer
BingoBoingo: asciilifeform: Picking a coordinate on a timeline
spec'd with "as soon as" seems like a rush if the circumstances aren't forcing it.
mp_en_viaje: be that as it may : one particularly inept internet provider in costa rica (whom i suspect by now is just a local-dressup verizon or coxco or somesuch rural midwestern bs) failed to deliver to
spec ; were warned to either immediately remedy or else (which they ignored) ; were ordered to close the contract (which they claimed they did) ; sent a further bill, which was returned with lolz (they responded by pointing out that contract c
lobbes: Add in the feedback cycle, digging into mpwp mysql guts, new additions to
spec tacked on (here I would link to various documented pieces on blog, if I had a working one) and I don't come anywhere close to 5-hours. It will be serving Trilema, and it is needed to be correct in one go; no do-overs. My reputation's on the line here. Spot of work my foot!
ossabot: Logged on 2019-10-06 15:13:21 mp_en_viaje: as it turns out, it's a hollow
spec, entirely holy water dousing. the orcs are just as pantsuit as the zeks, they're just too stupid to express it in specific forms, but otherwise will pantsuit reliably anyways.
ericbot: Logged on 2019-10-06 17:35:49 asciilifeform: then will actually fulfill mp's orig
spec of 'own fucking line, with no one to say 'we pulled you to protect our other derps' )
mp_en_viaje: as it turns out, it's a hollow
spec, entirely holy water dousing. the orcs are just as pantsuit as the zeks, they're just too stupid to express it in specific forms, but otherwise will pantsuit reliably anyways.
mp_en_viaje: and to continue that list : the "not nato" line in the original
spec defo not asset. we ate the cost of orcistan, but gained (through whoever's fault, leaving this aside) no upside from orcistan. we have no priviledged connection past what somone off the street yesterday would have, but we do have massive headache with eg supplies.
mircea_popescu:
http://logs.nosuchlabs.com/log/trilema/2019-09-26#1938151 << there is such a thing implemented, specifically in the auctionbot
spec for #eulora (say your line on the hour but only if there's been chatter since last saying). something very similar can also work here, "a new day starts when there's been silence for x time"). while clocks drift, they don't also diverge, not on the sort of scales here contemplated.
mircea_popescu: it's philosophically fraught, because as per
the spec a rating of 0 should convey that the rater deems he can answer NO questions about the ratee. in which case... why is it a rating.
mircea_popescu: this is so ; but for the sake of sanity im not gonna
spec significant changes in the middle of implementing a differen tspec.
lobbes: asciilifeform: well,
mircea_popescu's spec all of the lines are to appear on mp-wp articles (hence, the database piece is the backend for mp-wp, which is mysql)
snsabot: Logged on 2019-08-23 05:17:58 mircea_popescu: "Needless to say, I am unamused ; and, to answer the
original inquiry in firmer terms containing no ifs or buts : no, I personally have no further interest in hearing what phf may have to say on any topic. The time for "ok then, I will get my logger to
spec by X date and hope to have my blog up by Y date" came and went, sometime yesterday.
lobbes: ok, well confirmed that both the znc2tmsr and irssi2tmsr converters output to
spec re: action lines. Looks like it is just the raw log knob. I will dig into it, fix, and patch
mircea_popescu: yet writing client for clear and sane
spec quite different experience from patching "soft consensus and working code" biomass.
diana_coman: oh, nice work billymg ! I can fully appreciate having a testing suite esp reflecting the
spec like that, nice.
snsabot: Logged on 2019-08-30 06:59:30 mp_en_viaje: trying to maybe gwt out of it, hence
the work to
spec "blog" in the abstract ; but mp-wp stack works for trilema TODAY ; i ain't taking a break from publishing untul "better world". god knows the week long #trilema outage was long enough.
mp_en_viaje: trying to maybe gwt out of it, hence
the work to
spec "blog" in the abstract ; but mp-wp stack works for trilema TODAY ; i ain't taking a break from publishing untul "better world". god knows the week long #trilema outage was long enough.
billymg: re: blog work, i'm about to head out for the weekend, back early next week. i'll be able to bang out some more test coverage based on mircea_popescu's
spec on the trip and put together a status/roadmap post when i get back
mircea_popescu: "Needless to say, I am unamused ; and, to answer the
original inquiry in firmer terms containing no ifs or buts : no, I personally have no further interest in hearing what phf may have to say on any topic. The time for "ok then, I will get my logger to
spec by X date and hope to have my blog up by Y date" came and went, sometime yesterday.
snsabot: Logged on 2019-08-14 12:29:47 mp_en_viaje: billymg, im actually working on a universal blog
spec. it atm looks like
mp_en_viaje: billymg, im actually working on a universal blog
spec. it atm looks like
mp_en_viaje: wtf pile of eyesore and assorted sadness html
spec turns out to have been. all sorts of dangling nonsense a la above, it's the one midden that'll say the least flatterinfg things about humanity to the future archeologist.
lobbes: in my
spec before, I was going for something that took the data from the logbot db
mircea_popescu: not what the
spec ~actually~ satys, but i guess you went per tradition.
mircea_popescu: no i;m saying, current behaviour is corrdct but not per
spec