1700+ entries in 0.311s
trinque: this model is also applicable using
OTP, I'm aware, but while it proves something to *me*, it doesn't prove it to anyone else.
a111: Logged on 2016-12-02 19:24 trinque: I lean towards flipping the model to "decrypt and sign this command +
OTP" vs "decrypt and send in the clear this
OTP"
trinque: I lean towards flipping the model to "decrypt and sign this command +
OTP" vs "decrypt and send in the clear this
OTP"
☟︎ trinque: thing can barf gpg'd
OTP one direction, can receive
OTP from another
mod6: <+asciilifeform> dunno re elsewhere, but in su army it was a mixed bag, co was expected to shoot radioman if the latter is at risk of capture (e.g., injured & down) << did the su radio guys have all the
otp's for the day there with him or what not?
mircea_popescu: moreover, all this was before internet. nowadays, i can scarcely comprehend how it'd work that i'd degrade a text link into a dumb voice link with someone who is intelligent enough to safely maintain and use
otp.
mircea_popescu: what dude, it's hard enough to get a girl's phone, you want her to write down her fucking
otp for you ? while drunk at 3am ?
mod6: which consists of getting an encrypted
otp from deedbot, derypting it, then feeding the
otp back to deedbot with !!v <
OTP>
mircea_popescu: that's the
otp-likeness contemplated, you know the place where this is discussed in the logs ?
mircea_popescu: what's more important is that gossipd works like
otp : "sure you can decrypt this text mr evil. WHAT would you like it to decrypt to ?"
mircea_popescu: attacker is very free to discover any topology he likes, much in the way attacker is welcome to decipher
otp message to anything he pleases.
mod6: <+asciilifeform> ben_vulpes: i half-expect to hand out
otp's at the next meat gathering. << werd.
trinque: how does it differ from simply some storage stick (usb or w/e) with
otp matter?
diana_coman: hm, deedbot handed me 2 broomsticks before handing the
OTP link (in the third try)
mircea_popescu: there's also a subtle point here, which is : that if we indeed use a
otp-and-hash scheme, this in fact puts whatever hash scheme we use to work.
mircea_popescu: anyway : the rsa/
otp scheme is also bw-wasting, up to a factor of 2 if no hashing, or otherwise depending on how many hash passes, with 20 it's just 1.05 ie 5% more bw etc.
mircea_popescu: PeterL reusing an
otp straight makes bothering with the whole scheme kinda pointless ; hashing an old
otp to generate a new
otp is perhaps dubious, but in widespread use. (it's more or less what a "deterministic" wallet is, for instance)
PeterL: wasteful to pass N bytes of
otp for each N bytes of message?