2200+ entries in 0.135s
shinohai: So now pa1atine you already have key registered, you just need to /msg
deedbot !!up (assuming someone has rated you)
pa1atine: well, how to register it with
deedbot trinque: curious what f1maze thinks would be the alternative to
deedbot auth each time
f1maze: do I have to verify with
deedbot everytime I connect?
mircea_popescu: since
deedbot reads its rss anyway, i suppose the altenrate route is to go through archive.
a111: Logged on 2017-07-14 16:47 mircea_popescu: aaand trinque, incidentally, as it just occured to me -- can you get
deedbot payments online by the end of the month ? seems somewhat likely usg is gonna turn off its "webwallet" bullshits from blockchain.info down.
a111: Logged on 2017-07-20 19:01 trinque: pf: pf_normalize_tcp_stateful failed on first pkt <<
deedbot departures appear to correspond with this.
trinque: pf: pf_normalize_tcp_stateful failed on first pkt <<
deedbot departures appear to correspond with this.
☟︎ trinque: there is even a historic copy of grandfather's pistol in
deedbot trinque: anyhow the
deedbot box has backups on archival dvd, deploy scripts to plop the thing onto another box, etc etc; I'm sure same goes for other infrastructure
phf: 20:27 <freenode> CTCP-reply PING from
deedbot : 521771260.04 sec
phf: not that whatever's
deedbot returning is correct (nor does a111), according to my client
erlehmann: i don't even know
deedbot's given name!
andreicon: it'll run on an azure instance, only respond to me and have its own pubkey registered with
deedbot a111: Logged on 2017-07-14 16:47 mircea_popescu: aaand trinque, incidentally, as it just occured to me -- can you get
deedbot payments online by the end of the month ? seems somewhat likely usg is gonna turn off its "webwallet" bullshits from blockchain.info down.
mircea_popescu: aaand trinque, incidentally, as it just occured to me -- can you get
deedbot payments online by the end of the month ? seems somewhat likely usg is gonna turn off its "webwallet" bullshits from blockchain.info down.
☟︎☟︎ phf: andreicon: now would probably be the right time to figure out
deedbot's challenge/response dance for self-up, since you're now registered and in wot
mod6: Perhaps people can donate hardware for whatever purpose trb, uci/gossip via
deedbot; then could be accounted for by some process while under our control; maybe even listed as "asset"?
sina: as it currently sits with
deedbot, I currently don't, but can, run my irc connection on compartmented box away from gpg
mircea_popescu: consider regiustering your key with
deedbot so you can self voice
mircea_popescu: the original plan was to tie in payments with
deedbot payment system, and im sure that's how it'll work once that bit of infrastructure is ready.
trinque agrees, but arrived here with python, wrote a
deedbot a111: Logged on 2017-06-30 08:12 mircea_popescu: which depends on
deedbot payments, which reminds me... how's that going trinque ?
mircea_popescu: which depends on
deedbot payments, which reminds me... how's that going trinque ?
☟︎ trinque: this guy right here, shit you not, tells
deedbot:
Framedragger: yeah i guess that's a nice thing with
deedbot, it doesn't need secret key for most of the stuff incl. challenges..
sina: I assumed it was
deedbot style OTP thing
sina: alright. the gossipd thingo is 0.0.1 implemented. peers can communicate, each session (fetch messages) is mediated by
deedbot style OTP with per peer-pair RSA keys (no GPG shell asciilifeform, using libtomcrypt). I wrote a tiny client to add peers, exchange keys, broadcast msgs and view stored msgs. there is a README.
a111: Logged on 2016-09-13 19:22 Framedragger: (
deedbot not in room, and so bots don't self-voice)
pete_dushenski: if alf isn't the exception, trinque is more than welcome to remove contravex from
deedbot blogroll. i won't be offended even if i do look forward to the comments here, be they negative or positive.
mircea_popescu: *
deedbot gives voice to hanbot << somehow this struck me as quite funny :D
sn0wmonster: in what ways (please name as many as possible) is
deedbot patently different than #bitcoin-otc's gribble in terms of GPG/user ratings?
trinque: ty to ben_vulpes and mod6 for pinging me about
deedbot deedbot: pete_dushenski rated
deedbot 10 << primer inter pares
daffadil: +mircea_popescu so I don't need to do anything with that
deedbot OTP message?
mircea_popescu: daffadil oh i misunderstood what you were asking. i gave
deedbot an order, and to verify my identity it encrypted something to my key. that string in !!v
daffadil: don't understand the "Get your OTP" message from
deedbot, whose key encrypted it?
mircea_popescu: erlehmann say !!up in pm to
deedbot, then say !!v ah there you go.
trinque: heh, wasn't there a time when
deedbot chattered for pages all by itself? I vaguely recall
sina: "maybe
deedbot does something similar to what I was thinking"
mircea_popescu: in fact,
deedbot was intended to be federated from the get go... or in fact no. the item
deedbot replaced because the operator got syphilis (ie, assbot) was created specifically because failure of previous item (operator travelled unexpectedly, thing went down -- tis all in the logs) and was intended to be federated from the get-go
mircea_popescu: the fundamental flaw in your earlier mental process, which is periodically discussed in the logs, is that you try to take trust as an objective. trust isn't an objective, the reason i trust you is because I TRUST YOU, not because
deedbot says i do. and the ONLY use of the knowledge that i trust you is that you can ask me about you. nothing else.
sina: do you just post a message here saying "
deedbot sucks, I have rates sina -10 in my local copy, which should now be considered canonical via mpbot"?
sina: mircea_popescu: can you walk me through the hypothetical example case where you have woken up one morning and decided for some valid reason (e.g.
deedbot WoT contents no longer match your local copy) that
deedbot is no longer trustworthy but urgently want to enter a rating for me of -10 into the public record?
sina: is that the
deedbot.org/help.html page?
sina: because I didn't know, maybe
deedbot already does this kind of thing
mircea_popescu: now, the formalism for recording that rating currently in overwhelming use is !!rate. there is no rule that thios must be so. it is currently so for convenience, and because
deedbot is trustworthy. either of these can change, but this would affect little : the party who trusts you can enter that trust into the public record through whatever command
sina: but one can only be rated via
deedbot sina: (
deedbot being the root)