1500+ entries in 0.379s
fuddos: It looks like amazon blocks at least some of the ntp udp
spam mircea_popescu: you know all those "how to
spam google ? ORIGINAL CONTENT!!1" advicey bits ? they're actually quite on point.
mircea_popescu: punkman depends how you select them. if well selected, something pretty cool i imagine. like, a world in which nobody is going to
spam.
decimation: asciilifeform: yeah he definitely exhibited that pattern. but my priors tend to 'random derp (maybe mr
spam)' rather than 'usg agent'
IHB: so if we don't have the cap it is possible for a miner to load blocks up with
spam? and this in turn will weaken the network?
Guest70720: hi now i can
spam you like crazy for 30mins
danielpbarron: height=49141 and i'm getting lots of orphan
spam, swap space is getting used now
assbot: Logged on 05-02-2015 07:23:19; punkman: phillipsjk: the 1MB limit is not to stop
spam BingoBoingo: <phillipsjk> It has and will change. The 1MB block limit was introduced to stop
spam. You seem to be more militant than luke-Jr who called Bitcoin gambling sites
spam. You appear to call all "trivial" transactions
spam. << His definition of
spam is both more complex and stupider than that
fluffypony: phillipsjk: the 1MB limit is not to stop
spam.
ben_vulpes: phillipsjk: the 1MB limit is not to stop
spam.
punkman: phillipsjk: the 1MB limit is not to stop
spam phillipsjk: It has and will change. The 1MB block limit was introduced to stop
spam. You seem to be more militant than luke-Jr who called Bitcoin gambling sites
spam. You appear to call all "trivial" transactions
spam.
mircea_popescu apologizes for all the
spam in the more important discussion.
BingoBoingo: <mircea_popescu> asciilifeform the 2nd is particularly pernicious because of the "good enough" approach. "what do you mean bitcoin transactions can't be used to identify anything ? here's a list of derps we know for a fact, they're 50% of the blockchain
spam" << Reasons to never use a public Electrum server for people wondering about "Lite" wallets.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform the 2nd is particularly pernicious because of the "good enough" approach. "what do you mean bitcoin transactions can't be used to identify anything ? here's a list of derps we know for a fact, they're 50% of the blockchain
spam"
Adlai: my main problem with "mr
spam" was the high stock he placed in ideas
davout: asciilifeform: pardon my ignorance, but who is mr
spam?
STRML: We are a derivatives exchange for investors and speculators who are serious about the products they trade. I could give you the whole pitch but I don't want to
spam the channel :)
mircea_popescu: ben_vulpes: hey whose idea was it to prevent the network from relaying transactions outside of the context of blocks and was it really that good of an idea? << i think it's rudimentary
spam control.
mod6: and in forward versions, there are a variety of other checks for orphan
spam other than that.
Adlai: using a wot to reduce
spam/noise
Apocalyptic: I can see a quite unpleasant
spam attack otherwise
kakobrekla: he left? came only to
spam his thing ? :|
mircea_popescu: reddit has to shadowban users because
spam. bitcoin-assets does not. because wot works and "Feedback" doesn't ? awww, who knew.
BingoBoingo: <mircea_popescu> you actually do better by not even hiring a lawyer. << Personal bankruptcy differs in that you get a lawyer because it compells phone
spam aggro to their number and not yours
mircea_popescu: mike_c: and it is not unusual for it to catch humans << on the plus side, i get about 10-20 pieces of
spam a day, which are pretty much all handcranked. the attepts are well in the 1000s/hr. on the - side, occasionally people complain about having to redo a comment / having lost a comment in the depths.
mircea_popescu: "Money soon became worthless. We returned to an exchange. For a tin can of tushonka (think Soviet
spam), you could have a woman. (It is hard to speak of it, but it is true.) Most of the women who sold themselves were desperate mothers."
mircea_popescu: decimation: although one wonders why mr.
spam targets this channel instead of -otc << this is worth something.
mircea_popescu: decimation: freenode seems to attract folks like mr.
spam << has 0 to do with freenode. everything sweet attracts gnats.
decimation: yeah I'm being silly, hopefully mr.
spam learned his lesson
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform: Luke-Jr: '
spam' debate aside - how do you intend to filter the dice txes when the dicemeisters let go of the idiocy of reusing addrs ? <<< why idiocy ?
mircea_popescu: danielpbarron: this "
spam on the blockchain" is only a thing because blocks go unfilled for the most part << exactly.
decimation: lol re: mr.
spam's email << me thinks the lady doth protest too much
BingoBoingo: <asciilifeform> no ordinary
spam. some bozo put in actual sweat for no immediately apparent purpose. << All
spam involves those elements. This just takes it to a different level...
Luke-Jr: kakobrekla: sure, but as long as some
spam is easy to pick out, might as well
Adlai: If you think something is
spam or offtopic, flag it by going to its page and clicking on the "flag" link. (Not all users will see this; there is a karma threshold.) If you flag something, please don't also comment that you did.
BingoBoingo: thestringpuller: Well, at least you are recorded in the WoT in a way other than Mr
Spam is.
fluffypony: someone should change the default ircd builds on gentoo to include a
spam filter
decimation: although one wonders why mr.
spam targets this channel instead of -otc
decimation: what if mr.
spam learns the ip of a friend?
decimation: asciilifeform: agreed, but it might be impractical. consider a 'firewall' that is checking mr
spam's packets all day
decimation: freenode seems to attract folks like mr.
spam BingoBoingo: asciilifeform: I mean we have people apparently paying to send
spam now!
danielpbarron: 12:07 <+Luke-Jr> danielpbarron: "
spam" and "fee" have no direct relationship << yes they do. if I spend an old output, no fee required; i spend a new output with no fee, tx doesn't get spread
Luke-Jr: danielpbarron: "
spam" and "fee" have no direct relationship
danielpbarron: Luke-Jr, how can a transaction be "
spam" when it pays a fee?
BingoBoingo: Luke-Jr: Paying for a transaction is literally the definition of not
spam.