gribble: Error: "itkcer" is not a valid command.
ikeboy: and predictious doesn't allow submitting bets
gribble: Bitstamp BTCUSD ticker | Best bid: 312.48, Best ask: 312.66, Bid-ask spread: 0.18000, Last trade: 312.67, 24 hour volume: 21603.61278539, 24 hour low: 304.99, 24 hour high: 325.61, 24 hour vwap: 313.689908828
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AMHASH3] 865 @ 0.0012 = 1.038 BTC
ikeboy: that link isn't that informative
thestringpuller: ikeboy: you clearly have no idea what you're talking about.
ikeboy: I already said I'm not interested in bitbet
BingoBoingo: ikeboy: What odds interest you and why should other people be interested in them.
ikeboy: I'm interested in 10:1 odds on paycoin not being worth more than .01 BTC in 2 weeks
ikeboy: and anyone who has a greater than 90% that paycoin is going bust should pick this up
ikeboy: I would put up to ~2BTC on this, versus 20BTC
ikeboy: What's the problem? too small?
ikeboy: Don't tell me it's not worth $600 for someone to spend time setting it up
thestringpuller: it seems the only reason you want odds if for extended leverage.
ikeboy: what do you mean by that?
ikeboy: If you mean I can make more this way than by investing in paycoin directly, then yes
ikeboy: And people who were trying to convince me not to buy paycoin should be willing to put money behind that
ikeboy: what do you mean by leverage?
gribble: Error: We broke The Google!
ikeboy: i'm trying to increase my return. what do you think I'm trying to do?
cazalla: buy more paycoin then, sure bet!
ikeboy: that has an expected 200% gain, and a bet may have a 900% gain
cazalla: not if you're unable to find someone to bet against, i'd take the sure thing while you can lol
assbot: ikeboy +v failed; L1: 0, L2: 0
ikeboy: betmoose is here betmoose.com/bet/paycoin-to-be-worth-at-least-_01-btc-in-2015-1049
BingoBoingo: <ikeboy> And people who were trying to convince me not to buy paycoin should be willing to put money behind that << Not everyone who think Paycoin is a shit idea wants the same two week window you do.
ikeboy: ok, but they were trying to convince me that buying now to sell at $20 on monday is a bad idea
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 28600 @ 0.00060933 = 17.4268 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 44950 @ 0.00062795 = 28.2264 BTC [+] {3}
Adlai: so paycoin has progressed from vaporware to real, nitrogen-rich altcoincrap?
ikeboy: does that mean you don't believe in it?
ikeboy: if so, i have a bet for you ...
Adlai: of course i believe in paycoin. it is the vehicle through which the prophet garza will lead the people from usury and incest to riches and glory
Adlai: "don't believe in paycoin" doesn't translate cleanly to "willing to bet on a subset of the possible failure scenarios, as opposed to all others"
BingoBoingo: Adlai: Well It's a fork of peercoin. The code was already there just needed magic number tweaks. Also Peercoin was cooler when it was still called PeePeeCoin
Adlai: whatever happened to the real peepeecoin. nobody wants to trade their overpriced shitcoins for kilos of processed manure?
ikeboy: so give your prob estimates for: paycoin being worth ~$20 in 2 weeks, paycoin being worth ~10 dollars in 2 weeks, paycoin being pretty much worthless in 2 weeks
Adlai: "worth" is the key word. it could be worth $30 on the bucket shops that choose to list it, but zero to the rest of the world.
ikeboy: worth as in I can sell it for a value on an open market like coin-swap
Adlai: oh look it's another cryptsy
Adlai: it's like cryptsy except without litecoin shoved down my throat at every turn
ikeboy: if I can sell it for $20, that means someone is willing to pay for it
Adlai: 900BTC 24h vol XPY/BTC wtf
ikeboy: so ... your prob estimates?
Adlai hasn't the faintest clue how deep the lemmings' pockets run
ikeboy: I'm going now, but the betmoose is here for anyone betmoose.com/bet/paycoin-to-be-worth-at-least-_01-btc-in-2015-1049
Adlai: at that moment, kako was enlightened
Adlai: it could be that the ddoser is not ddosing himself. or that he's not ddosing people belonging to his site. or that he picks targets randomly, to give the illusion of unknown patterns.
BingoBoingo: Walk away with chumpnet, implement new bot, other things too prolly
assbot: Logged on 16-12-2014 01:04:22; asciilifeform: from the department of nyooz yoo can yooze - kakobrekla provided data from which we learn that ddos man has switched from ssdp to ntp 'amplification' attack (see literature.)
kakobrekla: i think the least damaging way is to kick nicks that are idle sing sing-on
kakobrekla: having a wot and having l2 trust not same thing.
decimation: people outside of L2 can read the logs
kakobrekla: yes, but. kick wont do, you have to ban the idler or else it just rejoins. secondly, if we fail to voice ppl which we kinda do, they will be casualties.
decimation: kakobrekla: one way around that issue would be to kick anyone who isn't in the wot (not L2)
decimation: I don't get the point to idling on a logged channel (without voice)
kakobrekla: hm. how about 1 min auto voice on join for unseen nicks?
decimation: what about unseen nicks who are authed by gribble?
decimation: there is an incentive to do this anyway
decimation: nanotube might consider deleting wot ID's that haven't authed in a period of time
decimation: really I guess that's the same solution as Mr. Luke-jr
decimation: Like bitcoin, the wot database is going to grow forever
decimation: asciilifeform: but this only works if one regards a n00b with utter contempt
decimation: which would basically require being personally known to someone in the wot
decimation: an introduction that couldn't be replicated by perl script
kakobrekla: honestly im not sure whats worse, autoddos or autoban.
decimation: it's not really a ban, it's more of a bouncer
TomServo: BingoBoingo: You're movie clip on qntra shows 'removed by user'. :(
decimation: is it possible to 'hook' ChanServ to intercept joins before they happen?
kakobrekla: nah pretty much everything these days has 'autorejoin' option
kakobrekla: which was also responsible for a bunch of cloak fails
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AMHASH1] 1000 @ 0.00121415 = 1.2142 BTC [+] {2}
kakobrekla: that can be mitigated by secondary up only bot.
decimation: I thought cloak fails were associated with users who aren't sasl authed
BingoBoingo: AH, only longterm solution seems to be an ircd foundation
decimation: I donno, what would you name your rsa/udp/wot idea?
kakobrekla: what i meant was "pls invite" pms that would follow
kakobrekla: which i think you meant was to be refused
decimation: asciilifeform: I guess I missed the name, what is it?
kakobrekla: and hypothetically given we have l2 +i, do we still need +m?
kakobrekla: well you manually invite a 'new guy' take the chance it doesnt work out, you need some means to get rid of it?
kakobrekla: but if we dont have +m we are not up or down
BingoBoingo: Seems whole new IRC network is the solution instead of arguing freenode +i vs. +m conventions
decimation: freenode seems to attract folks like mr. spam
BingoBoingo: asciilifeform: Well, there are ideas. If a new network popped up parachute would be likely. Seems though that the root of current problem is freenode baring IPs and lacking any controling entity that could be convinced to do otherwise.
undata_: hosted in a five-eyes country might be another :p
undata_: asciilifeform: heh, point taken.
BingoBoingo: asciilifeform: It depends on the kind of restaurant. I am pretty sure some restaurants would be intolerable if it wasn't for heavy smoking.
kakobrekla: i think the main issue is he wont be able to take credit.
BingoBoingo: Everyone needs to eat their vegetables from time to time though
BingoBoingo: I think having had a GPG key fingerprint on an MPEx listed contract is the rough equivalent of a commision so asciilifeform at the worst you are probaby a captain by now.
BingoBoingo remembers for the longest time in childhood the hometown having a metal wagon wheel fascimile supported on a post in the town square
BingoBoingo: asciilifeform: Well, given the height of the post and its location in SOuthern Illinois, probably the latter.
BingoBoingo: Seems hsitorically this was a "Sundown Town"
BingoBoingo: Though the first definition was probably offered by the time of my birth.
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 6491 @ 0.00063284 = 4.1078 BTC [+]
kakobrekla: hm iirc gribble wont let you auth if you are not present on one of his blessed chans
BingoBoingo: kakobrekla: Yeah, I discovered that yesterday.
kakobrekla: afaik it is suppose to be a securitah feature and i dunno where nano stands on that.
PeterL: you are trying to make it more complicated?
BingoBoingo: Oh, the dollar is crashing today! Against the Phillipine Peso!
kakobrekla: is there some override for invite for ops?
PeterL: so the change to voicing you are suggesting, we now need to join something like #bitcoin-otc, then auth with gribble, then we can join #bitcoin-assets, then we still need to pm assbot '!up'?
kakobrekla: PeterL we just need to make it complicated enough so Luke-Jr doesnt figure it out.
PeterL: ;;gettrust assbot luke-jr
Luke-Jr: kakobrekla: then none of you could either
undata_: heh I am totally making a bitcoin overlay as a weekend project btw
Luke-Jr: BingoBoingo: kakobrekla is the one trolling :p
Luke-Jr: undata_: lol, just to change USE flag?
BingoBoingo: Luke-Jr: kakobrekla doesn't troll, he works hard for his cookies. No boat required.
undata_: Luke-Jr: no, to be sure when I emerge sync I don't unwittingly have more of your decisions foisted upon me
Luke-Jr: undata_: overlays won't do that
undata_: Luke-Jr: they will if I mask your turds
Luke-Jr: don't need an overlay to do that
Luke-Jr: just add to /etc/portage/package.mask
Luke-Jr: it doesn't force you to unmerge stuff either, and should notify you when there's an update being masked
Luke-Jr: btw, in case you didn't notice, I go out of my way to prevent any unwitting
undata_: Luke-Jr: I accept that your intent is to "do good"
undata_: anyhow I don't want to rehash it.
assbot: Logged on 16-12-2014 21:34:38; Luke-Jr: asciilifeform: that would make sense; people seem to assume something monumentally stupid is worthless, but in practice it isn't.
gribble: Rating entry successful. Your rating of -1 for user Luke-Jr has been recorded.
BingoBoingo: asciilifeform: It takes time for assbot to update the rectum
mike_c: so I am an angry bitbet customer, and I want to come here for help. how do I get in if it is invite-only?
BingoBoingo: ^ Ah, case for keeping a vegetable garden element
mike_c: ok, I am a reporter for NYT, I have to do same dance?
Luke-Jr: funny how I'm falsely accused of censorship, and the reaction here is to censor me ;)
PeterL: hands don't help much if you don't know where to put them
mike_c: and the problem we are trying to solve here is that uncloaked noobs might get ddos'd.
Luke-Jr: asciilifeform: I have no victims, I've not done anything wrong.
Luke-Jr: asciilifeform: you are a hypocrite, nothing more
mike_c: the solution being, we lock them out.
Luke-Jr: mike_c: you realise the regulars/admins here are insane?
PeterL: so if an uncloaked noob comes by, asks for voice and gets let in, then they will be ddossed?
mike_c: Luke-Jr: they smell funny too
PeterL: whoever is ddossing now?
mike_c: PeterL: my understanding is anyone who enters uncloaked, thereby flashing their IP, get ddos'd by the fucktarded bot that is lurking in here.
PeterL: and we assume the ddoser is outside the l2?
mike_c: idk, I think it's fine that we let them talk when they are actual people. how are they to become actual people if they can't listen?
mike_c: by hitting f5 on log.b-a?
PeterL: there is some benefit to seeing what is happening now, in reaction to events going on
PeterL: and you loose some sense of the timing when you read the logs
PeterL: but really, you can learn alot more going over a few months of logs than trying to get lucky by finding something interesting happening right now at this moment
mike_c: feels like cutting off head because enemy is making our nose itch.
mike_c: kako is too easily swayed by a cookie or two.
assbot: Logged on 19-12-2014 01:44:12; BingoBoingo: Well, sometimes assbot has downtime too.
PeterL: what happens if somebody tries to join the chan without auth/L2? do they get dumped into #bitcoin-assets-noobs?
kakobrekla: among other things, it is out of my control.
PeterL: have assbot take over the WoT?
kakobrekla: could only be done as completely separate auth
kakobrekla: that has no effect on issues im presenting
PeterL: it's strange, you must be in chan, but you can auth in a pm, so why be in the chan?
PeterL: if gribble is afk, then nobody can get into this chan
PeterL: they would still be able to manually up people, right?
PeterL: I think people can be voiced now manually if gribble is down but not if assbot is down?
kakobrekla: yes, can and willing to is not interchangeable
PeterL: in the proposed system, can people join if assbot is down?
kakobrekla: option 2, move the auth to assbot and save another step (!up)
PeterL: have a #bitcoin-assets WoT separate from #bitcoin-otc?
kakobrekla: but basically as far as i gather punkman already downloads wot data from otc
decimation: I don't get how level 2 has 0 connections, but joecool, nanotube and pankakke are connected to him?
PeterL: decimation: there are a bunch of -1s which offset +1s
PeterL: it is not 0 connections, it is 0 score
PeterL: asciilifeform: but you have to auth before making an operation, so it is almost like being signed
PeterL: how would you add signatures here?
decimation: asciilifeform: another alternative: all chat is pm'ed to assbot, who posts it to the log
BingoBoingo: #b-a irc net seems the only long term solution
BingoBoingo: With other less strict channels existing on the net
kakobrekla: i go through it a few times a year but for that reason particularly
BingoBoingo: asciilifeform: So you are saying BUY on namecoin
nanotube: asciilifeform: it's a way to track a person by hostmask, to provide persistent auth sessions. once we move to 'everything must be signed' there would be no need for auth sessions, and thus no need for people to be in particular channels shared with gribble.
BingoBoingo: asciilifeform: Or maybe you don't yet know you imply it. It's the only alt I know of with Satoshi commits
BingoBoingo: namecoin has been shot in the head many times
mike_c: yes, but he knows the nick didn't switch.
nanotube: asciilifeform: sure, but not everyone who uses the wot is in this channel or is cloaked :)
nanotube: asciilifeform: not really. got an executive summary? :)
decimation: nanotube: there's a ddoser who spams anyone who joins #bitcoin-assets with a 'naked' ip with an ntp amplification attack
nanotube: well, that's a reason for people here to be cloaked. i remember hearing about that
undata: yeah, sasl failed for me earlier
nanotube: yea, freenode unfortunately doesn't default-cloak people
undata: no idea why, but it left me without my cloak for a bit, as freenode wouldn't let me change nicks
decimation: given how obvious this flaw is, one wonders why no one has undertaken to fix it
PeterL: so the question for you: would it be possible to let people auth without being in a chan with gribble?
nanotube: it is being worked on. but have a lot of other stuff on my plate. once everything is signed, there will not even be a need for something like "auth".
nanotube: asciilifeform: well, more like an anti "guy leaves, some other guy comes in on same ip, and gribble has no way of knowing about it, unless they share a channel and gribble can see quits"
PeterL: so instead of just saying "eauth peterl", now we will say "eauth peterl <signature by key goes here>"?
nanotube: PeterL: you'll say "rate dude 1 signature". why even a separate 'auth' step?
PeterL: we use it here to verify people are who they say they are
nanotube: asciilifeform: i'm hoping for a gradual transition, as people upgrade their ratings with signed packets. after a sunset period, all unsigned ratings may be ignored
PeterL: that helps with ratings, but does not help the current voicing model of #b-a
nanotube: PeterL: oh well, i guess auth can stay for that purpose. or you can just send a signed message to assbot directly, in theory.
nanotube: asciilifeform: hrm... that's a tough problem. how?
decimation: assbot would them pm the list of interested parties?
PeterL: so instead of authing with gribble, we send auth message to assbot? one step instead of 3, sounds good to me
nanotube: asciilifeform: yes... but then the squatter will just squat on the 'gateway' channel where people get forwarded when they are not invited
nanotube: hm and how do new people get in
nanotube: and what prevents squatter from doing that, from several different identities?
PeterL: would we need to pm assbot to get a challenge to decrypt, or could it be something like we just send assbot the signature of "auth <wot name> <current time>"?
nanotube: PeterL: that depends on assbot coder. :)
PeterL: ^ directed at kakobrekla
decimation: and if he managed to make it on, he would be identified by the brains of those on the channel and quickly kicked
nanotube: PeterL: still way too early to worry about it though :)
nanotube: well, i hope it works. i'd be curious to see.
PeterL: nanotube: I don't think the change I am suggesting would require any change of gribble, just adding a separate auth to assbot
nanotube: PeterL: indeed that is correct.
decimation: why not have assbot (or a slave bot) simply pm everyone a copy of signed messages?
PeterL: decimation: how to sign messages in irc client?
decimation: well, yeah that part would be annoying
decimation: but at least it would be a step in the right direction
decimation: and it would eliminate most of the dependence on freenode infrastructure
nanotube: use pastebin to pass a signed message to the bot. assbot can just grab the user database on a regular basis to keep current.
decimation: how do we know that pastebin's 'bins' are immutable?
decimation: ah, but then assbot would need a 'hot key'
decimation: ah well who generates the signed message? gribble?
PeterL: why not have assbot do what gribble does now for authing?
PeterL: auth to assbot in a pm, that gives you voice?
PeterL: then once you are in you can auth with gribble too if you need to update any ratings
PeterL: (or just send a signed rating message once that gets implemented)
PeterL: lol, I can't read and type at the same time
PeterL: yes, and so you will no longer have to auth with gribble, just assbot
decimation: asciilifeform: agreed, but it might be impractical. consider a 'firewall' that is checking mr spam's packets all day
decimation: I suspect the crypto would need to be done on an fpga
decimation: what 'handle' are you going to use for banning? ip address?
decimation: what if mr. spam learns the ip of a friend?
decimation: a high-end fgpa would be perfectly capable of passing full pipe of signed packets
kakobrekla: and you dont like it cause double auth for rating
PeterL: how often do you rate people?
decimation: ultimately this could just move the problem to #bitcoin-otc or something
PeterL: and it will not be an extra step to rate people when he makes the changes he suggested
decimation: although one wonders why mr. spam targets this channel instead of -otc
decimation: seems like there would be more likely targets there
PeterL: people who matter are here, not there?
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 30100 @ 0.00063527 = 19.1216 BTC [+] {2}
BingoBoingo: undata: Yeah, they labeled their thing "The Machine"
decimation: I think they developed some kind of persistant hybrid ram/flash storage
BingoBoingo would like to rip all of the memory out of "The Machine" and air drop it to asciilifeform in 2010 with a duffelbag full of money
undata stops being lazy and auths
decimation: asciilifeform: whether it is this or another thing, the difference between filesystems and memory will soon be abolished
PeterL: "In particular, the company needs to perfect a new form of computer memory based on an electronic component called a memristor" << so, they just need to figure out how to make the core feature work, then they are all set!
BingoBoingo: asciilifeform: Palm V and I have great memories. My only regret is that PalmV and TI-89 never traded the best of their aspects
undata predicts there will just be drivers that establish one part of ram as a ramdisk
undata: and it will be linux as usual
decimation: poettering will even make it auto-detect laptop flash-ram-whatever automatically
PeterL: "but that is how we have always done programming!"
decimation: sadly hp has denegrated the proud hp line
BingoBoingo: And then I sold it for booze money freshman year of college
BingoBoingo: decimation: Poettering is why horses invented the wagon wheel
decimation: or you just find the hp collectors amusing?
decimation: it's pretty much the most lispy calc ever made
decimation: was that the one that was popular with the finance types?
decimation: the annoying thing to me (growing up on a -48) was that the 16 only displayed one stack element at a time
decimation: well, it kinda does stack oriented calculation, but isn't a fully programmable calc like the -48
decimation: I guess because 'cheating' or something
decimation: yeah it would be interesting to know about a test that allows ti-89
BingoBoingo: asciilifeform: The AP-Calc AB test. There was a class training for it, but the local recommendation was anything TI preferably 83. I read and saw -89 with the CAS and decided fuck that.
decimation: asciilifeform: that was how much undergrad was
decimation: calculators don't help you cheat much on a three question engineering exam where you show full work
BingoBoingo: I got the calculator realizing that I was not buying it to use as a calculator, but as a standards conforming computer in a particular scenario
BingoBoingo: asciilifeform: As mentioned kept it till college and sold it for intoxicants
BingoBoingo: But in math classes at college calculators were rather useless
BingoBoingo: I overclocked a couple for people who had pirate Z80 (gameboy) games
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 3700 @ 0.00064085 = 2.3711 BTC [+]
BingoBoingo: Ran on calc with emulator if I remember right
decimation: then the hp49 was a lousy ti knockoff (chassis-wise) but the software was excellent
decimation: the hp48 was very close to being the original portable computing gadget
decimation: for awhile there was an active usenet group swapping warez
mats: 22:36:46 <+decimation> given how obvious this flaw is, one wonders why no one has undertaken to fix it << some #freenode regulars (may have been staff, i don't recall) claim that default cloaks interfere with channel moderation
decimation: the obvious fix would be to hash ip addresses with a private salt
mats: something about being unable to wholesale ban /16
mats: yes, i suggested this, but then it became 'there are a host of other ways to compel privacy leak'
decimation: and if such a custom requirement were needed, why not add as a filter in front of the irc daemon
mats: without explanation.
decimation: there are even reasonable text readers available
decimation: I remember using one in my high school, running sgp4 to predict satellites rising
mats: i for one would like to know what these other methods are. there was a vague finger wag at attacking services
decimation: yeah if someone hacked a freenode server, game over obviously
decimation: but presuming that isn't the case, there is no reason to freely share ips
decimation: twitter, facebook, google, etc all connect millions of users are many servers without this
mats: commence discussion on how to design an ircd resistant to these problems.
decimation: mats: my point is why is this left to us? this flaw must be obvious to thousands
BingoBoingo: decimation: Left to us because twatter was built "on rails:
mats: staffers don't believe its a problem.
decimation: which puts them on par with the tor 'admin' who doxxed some guy because he was annoying
BingoBoingo: I'm not going that far, but it could be reasonably read that way.
decimation: re: earlier discussion of jet fuel << I believe the abrams uses a turbine, which could burn jp-4
BingoBoingo wants to run a limo service after this morning with T-72 and a deck on top
decimation: it can burn whatever hydrocarbon you happen to capture
gribble: Current Blocks: 334911 | Current Difficulty: 3.945767130713873E10 | Next Difficulty At Block: 336671 | Next Difficulty In: 1760 blocks | Next Difficulty In About: 2 weeks, 0 days, 16 hours, and 0 seconds | Next Difficulty Estimate: 34712504492.9 | Estimated Percent Change: -12.02597
gribble: Bitstamp BTCUSD ticker | Best bid: 309.51, Best ask: 310.16, Bid-ask spread: 0.65000, Last trade: 310.26, 24 hour volume: 18278.00528347, 24 hour low: 304.99, 24 hour high: 319.83, 24 hour vwap: 312.492458631
gribble: Error: "tocker" is not a valid command.
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM1] 10 @ 0.11999899 = 1.2 BTC [+] {2}
assbot: Logged on 19-12-2014 03:11:44; asciilifeform: one of the things that always gave me the willies about the classic (nanotube's) wot is that operations are not signed
crybabi: hello BingoBoingo is this support for bitbet?
PeterL: crybabi: bitbet mods lurk here, go ahead, they should answer
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 12167 @ 0.00062458 = 7.5993 BTC [-]
crybabi: BingoBoingo: I made a bet and it got refunded, but I only received 4.95 BTC instead of the 5 BTc I sent
crybabi: it looks like your software is charging the fee on bets that are refunded
PeterL: they keep 1% even on refunds
PeterL: I think it is in the FAQ?
BingoBoingo: crybabi: Not my software, but what was your bet?
gribble: Error: We broke The Google!
assbot: i-am-serious-now-serious-wtf-scary-demotivational-poster-1246912060.jpg Photo by cplpunishment | Photobucket ... (
http://bit.ly/13G8inb )
BingoBoingo: crybabi: If you offer more info maybe BitBet mods may materialize with information on decisions
crybabi: BingoBoingo: I see it now, my bet got confirmed after it was resolved
crybabi: but i won't be using bitbet again, charging a fee when you don't provide a service is no way to run a business
BingoBoingo: Well, crybabi What is your big concern. And what was the bet. That seems quite a bit to bet.
BingoBoingo: maybe they thought you were intending to use Bitbet Mixer?
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 11400 @ 0.00062458 = 7.1202 BTC [-]
BingoBoingo: BitBet mixer is why I thought prop stakes were refunded minus fee
BingoBoingo: But no, cuckoldy Mr. Watch a dick in his wiferson left early
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AMHASH3] 2000 @ 0.0012 = 2.4 BTC
Adlai hasn't enjoyed an online course this much since 18.06
Adlai: although fun could be a symptom of in-one-ear-outtheother syndrome
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AMHASH1] 1650 @ 0.00121 = 1.9965 BTC [-]
Adlai watches the bots make idiotic decisions, hope they know something we don't!
Adlai: background music is left as an exercise for the viewer
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AMHASH3] 7968 @ 0.0012 = 9.5616 BTC
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 59600 @ 0.00064571 = 38.4843 BTC [+] {5}
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 12900 @ 0.00065511 = 8.4509 BTC [+] {3}
assbot: A Million Metaorder Analysis of Market Impact on the Bitcoin by Jonathan Donier, Julius Friedrich Bonart :: SSRN ... (
http://bit.ly/1zGSOev )
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AMHASH1] 1152 @ 0.0012 = 1.3824 BTC [-] {4}
TomServo: Can multiple nicks be upped at once?
TomServo: I just turned joins back on to assist in upping folks. Let me know if it's too much.
davout: oh god, such romanian drama
davout: don't fuck with the guy that has the passwords
BingoBoingo: I'm glad Bitcoin-Central never has such drama.
davout: tbh we had different kinds of drama
BingoBoingo: Well, you can't pick a name and stick with it :p
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 53100 @ 0.0006163 = 32.7255 BTC [-] {5}
kakobrekla: >We apologize for any inconvenience caused in recent days. Unfortunately, our main programmer took control of servers refusing to hand in resignation.
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 11750 @ 0.00060165 = 7.0694 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 8582 @ 0.00060165 = 5.1634 BTC [-]
davout: kakobrekla: how did they post it is the question
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AMHASH3] 907 @ 0.0012 = 1.0884 BTC
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AMHASH3] 130000 @ 0.0012 = 156 BTC
assbot: [HAVELOCK:AMHASH3] 1D: 0.00120000 / 0.0012 / 0.00120000 (167376 shares, 200.85120000 BTC), 7D: 0.00120000 / 0.0012 / 0.00120000 (386419 shares, 463.70280000 BTC), 30D: 0.00120000 / 0.0012 / 0.00120000 (806427 shares, 967.71240000 BTC)
BingoBoingo: kakobrekla: Seems Naphex and HoreaV have a dispute. More details and drama are probably coming out eventually. Since Naphex hasn't defaced the hell of of the site or run away with everything it seems someone probably broke a contract and they are probably going to try suing the hell out of each other.
mats: what a waste of time
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 13900 @ 0.00064117 = 8.9123 BTC [+]
jurov: "the admin took control of the server"
BingoBoingo: "10 reasons Preet Bharara should be the next attorney general"
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AMHASH1] 886 @ 0.00120722 = 1.0696 BTC [+] {2}
davout: jurov: it's quite strange that they then somehow manage to publish a notice on the server
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 20650 @ 0.00064136 = 13.2441 BTC [+] {2}
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [SCRYPT] 209 @ 0.00684 = 1.4296 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 38849 @ 0.00064959 = 25.2359 BTC [+] {2}
thestringpuller: asciilifeform laughs "muhaha' as he starts up a proto-cardano
gribble: CAUTION: irc nick differs from otc registered nick. Nick 'Potissimus', with hostmask 'Potissimus!uid57177@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-tzdrxcdqcetzydlv', is identified as user 'Naphex', with GPG key id 64CDBADCE1E0BBAF, key fingerprint F3D76A985F5844814A93F46364CDBADCE1E0BBAF, and bitcoin address 12mVDqdWqFY6zrCqNqgHbxhDPB4ZVUuaTu
Potissimus: well he never had access to the servers
Potissimus: the servers are locked down, no remote management
Potissimus: you bring em up with KVM Console from the guys from the DC
Potissimus: they contain the authoritive data, why access them
Potissimus: in controlled situations you bring them up, deploy and then take them down
Potissimus: he didn't have the source codes as well
Potissimus: all sources codes were on my own private repository
Potissimus: and prejudices, there are none. on the bitcoin side
Potissimus: fiat side is his own responsability and he is the only one with access
Potissimus: but the deal breaker was him starting to threaten me
Potissimus: i just ignored him, and he did all this on his own
ben_vulpes: you were in a business relationship - yourself on the btc/dev/ops side, himself on the fiat banking/regulatory side, correct?
Potissimus: a) he started running a fractional reserve, i only noticed when i heard there werent sufficient funds to send from the fiat side. to fill the withdrawal queue
Potissimus: it wasn't a problem, but it was a 1 day delay with the funds from bitstamp
Potissimus: but that shouldn't have happen, since the fiat side should've been 100% reserve
ben_vulpes: lol fractional reserve not a problem? hilarious, but go on
mircea_popescu: anyway, re the entire btcexchange thing : i know both the people involved, on the grounds they took a trip to timisoara.
mircea_popescu: for that matter, naphex explained what was going on as was going on, to the usual barrage of "i told you so"
mircea_popescu: basically, the horeav dude is a redneck doofus on a power trip, and lying through his teeth.
mircea_popescu: ben_vulpes you should have seen the dude show up for a business meeting, white cotton wife beater & audi.
mircea_popescu: anyway, romania is traditionally cheap, and the dude figures hey, why shouldn't programmer work butt off for 400 euro/month or w/e.
TomServo: Redneck indeed. An audi requires a silk wifebeater, amateurs!
mircea_popescu: because yes, the world really and desperately needs "entrepreneurs" from neanderthal.
gribble: CAUTION: irc nick differs from otc registered nick. Nick 'Potissimus', with hostmask 'Potissimus!uid57177@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-tzdrxcdqcetzydlv', is identified as user 'Naphex', with GPG key id 64CDBADCE1E0BBAF, key fingerprint F3D76A985F5844814A93F46364CDBADCE1E0BBAF, and bitcoin address 12mVDqdWqFY6zrCqNqgHbxhDPB4ZVUuaTu
gribble: You rated user naphex on Thu May 15 21:01:35 2014, with a rating of 2, and supplied these additional notes: btcxchange.ro.
gribble: You have not yet rated user horeav
mircea_popescu: so anyway, other that europe's other decent exchange imploding, how is everyone ?
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 34850 @ 0.00065512 = 22.8309 BTC [+] {3}
mircea_popescu: (for the romanian ear, fukishima mostly sounds like "fuck you and your mother")
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform this one you'll apreciate : a good insult to gift someone is "bezmetic"
rithm: back seat of a 74 vw beetle?
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [SCRYPT] 500 @ 0.00684 = 3.42 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AMHASH1] 3400 @ 0.00121483 = 4.1304 BTC [+] {6}
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AMHASH3] 874 @ 0.0012 = 1.0488 BTC
gribble: Error: We broke The Google!
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 8100 @ 0.00064522 = 5.2263 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AMHASH3] 1000 @ 0.0012 = 1.2 BTC
rithm: it's been borked for a few days, anything google related
rithm: well nm i'm a moron
pete_dushenski: ;;later tell peterl please to add contravex to the blogroll :)
cazalla: pete_dushenski, can't believe you fell for au cinema scam lol
pete_dushenski: well it's not my fault the weather has been shite and pushed me indoors
cazalla: tbh, i assumed it was the same elsewhere, real shame what they've done to cinema here
pete_dushenski: i knew cars were 50% more expensive, food too, shouldn't be surprising that movies are as well
cazalla: ya, last time i went, i was ready to start smashing things
assbot: Bitcoin: L’Économie de la Débrouillardise International, aka “Système DI” | Contravex: A blog by Pete Dushenski ... (
http://bit.ly/1zdwOZW )
assbot: When Your Kids Ask You What A Computer Is, Take Them To Melbourne. | Contravex: A blog by Pete Dushenski ... (
http://bit.ly/1zdwSsw )
assbot: A swimming pool of idle tears won’t spare the affirmative action fallguy. She’s still the canary. | Contravex: A blog by Pete Dushenski ... (
http://bit.ly/1zdwSJd )
assbot: Smoking causes cancer, and other humourously enraging consequences of regulatory capture | Contravex: A blog by Pete Dushenski ... (
http://bit.ly/1zdwUk6 )
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 18000 @ 0.00063554 = 11.4397 BTC [-] {3}
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 5333 @ 0.00060165 = 3.2086 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 15787 @ 0.00059229 = 9.3505 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AMHASH3] 2558 @ 0.0012 = 3.0696 BTC
jurov: and buttcoiners are grabbing popcorn
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AMHASH3] 869 @ 0.0012 = 1.0428 BTC
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AMHASH3] 1187 @ 0.0012 = 1.4244 BTC
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AMHASH3] 1000 @ 0.0012 = 1.2 BTC
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AMHASH3] 3751 @ 0.0012 = 4.5012 BTC
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 24649 @ 0.00066493 = 16.3899 BTC [+] {2}
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 7225 @ 0.00066832 = 4.8286 BTC [+]
assbot: Bloody Hell: Argentina's Import Restrictions Cause Tampon Shortage | The Bubble | News from Argentina ... (
http://bit.ly/1sHBZd9 )
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 41134 @ 0.00062009 = 25.5068 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AMHASH3] 1121 @ 0.0012 = 1.3452 BTC
agorecki: I'm surprised that so many people choose to have channel joins / parts displayed. I have to leave them off because there are too many in high population channels
agorecki: Hmm. My IRC client actually does support turning that on and off on a per channel basis. I guess I'll make use of that feature then :|