log☇︎
37 entries in 0.528s
asciilifeform: diana_coman: i do not currently have a concrete scheme for 'expand l1, l2' that would rise to the level of a plan. (and i've permanently 0 interest in servicing heathens, i.e. those not in wot at all.)
mircea_popescu: not in wot.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform i have no intention to comment on the "pro" whatever it is. the "authors" not in wot, item dun exist, wut do i care.
asciilifeform: laplinker: keep in mind also that there can be no question of e.g. selling probes, to somebody not in wot.
a111: Logged on 2016-03-10 21:32 asciilifeform: was rebuffed by royal society for ~decades~ because... not in wot.
shinohai thinks that fixes it, and is sufficient snub to audacity of individual not in wot
a111: Logged on 2017-05-07 14:33 asciilifeform: but did not register a name, still not in wot. mega-unsurprise.
asciilifeform: but did not register a name, still not in wot. mega-unsurprise. ☟︎
Framedragger: yesyes, "not in wot" is central nail in coffin against any of these, sure. (nevertheless could be useful for certain isolated efforts, e.g. ip space scanning and so on.)
Framedragger: yesyes, "not in wot" is central nail in coffin against any of these, sure. (nevertheless could be useful for certain isolated efforts, e.g. ip space scanning and so on.)
ben_vulpes: at this point the obvious rejoinder is "if not in wot -- tentacle"
Framedragger: asciilifeform: actually what i also like about archive.is (don't get me wrong, i agree that trusting a service run by some d00d not in wot isn't super future-proof, ahem) is that it *does* save a bitmap rendered image for the site, too
ben_vulpes: imho v should not barf when patch and seal exist but key does not in wot
mircea_popescu: we're here to develop the tmsr human resources, not to get some derps not in wot to eat their fucking peas.
pete_dushenski: isn't ak 'in bitcoin' but not in wot ?
ben_vulpes: not in wot, not published.
mircea_popescu: for one thing, those people are schmucks. but even if they weren't schmucks, not in wot.
asciilifeform: was rebuffed by royal society for ~decades~ because... not in wot. ☟︎
mircea_popescu: in any case : while a hierarchy could perhaps be constructed in the "not in wot" pile, as you propose or otherwise,
asciilifeform: author is not in wot, who knows if there are backups - and where, etc
asciilifeform: pete_dushenski: amd is not in wot, while we're at it
pete_dushenski: but not in wot
hanbot: say mod6 (or whoever else knoweth), given keys in .wot dir are to be named by wot identity a la mod6, what am i to name korsgaard's key, since he's not in wot?
jurov: quaternions are not in wot, case closed.
asciilifeform: see also the 'rating folks not in wot?' and 'branding a snake' thread
mircea_popescu: we can even have a "usg affiliated entities pay 4x, people not in wot pay 2x."
asciilifeform: so this character is known here, but is not in wot proper ?
thestringpuller: i'm not saying people not in WoT danielpbarron
mircea_popescu: mike_c a mechanism made by someone not in wot doesn't really exist.
MolokoDesk: yeah yeah, I'm not in wot.
ben_vulpes: not in wot?!!?
zoinky: I am not in WoT
thestringpuller: you're not in wot yet?
thestringpuller: satoshi is not in WoT, don't trust him
kakobrekla: ;;rate Chaang-Noi -10 not in WOT
kakobrekla: NOT IN WOT?!?!?!?
kakobrekla: not in WOT?!