4100+ entries in 0.278s
trinque: one more restart of teh
deedbot- and I'm through fiddling with that part.
trinque:
deedbot- barfeth what
deedbot- muncheth
mircea_popescu: <
deedbot-> [BitBet Bets Bets] 11.28000000 BTC on 'No' - The ETH scam won't see 2016 << whoa that's some decent bang for a buck. ty internets.
assbot: Logged on 15-09-2015 03:41:50; trinque: anyhow, perhaps someone will offer to sell his time maintaining something through the
deedbot- buy/sell board I'm hacking on at the moment
trinque: anyhow, perhaps someone will offer to sell his time maintaining something through the
deedbot- buy/sell board I'm hacking on at the moment
☟︎ trinque spend some time last night writing notes on a WoT+
deedbot web of CLOS displayed by CLIM
trinque: til
deedbot's regex dun mind a comma
mod6:
deedbot.org white & black now 'eh
pete_dushenski: ;;later tell trinque wd on
deedbot-, as ever. any progress with the bitbet integration ?
punkman: cazalla: seems like the winner was a
deedbot trinque: I tend to lean the way
deedbot.org looks
trinque: ;;later tell mircea_popescu made some updates to
deedbot.org, added F.A.Q. which will grow more today. Of particular note, more sensible URLs, and a separate download for each bundle as it was hashed.
funkenstein_: thanks for support trinque, apologies for
deedbot noobage
BingoBoingo: trinque: Also the site prolly needs the
deedbot funding address on it
trinque:
deedbot- isn't currently n00b friendly at all, no. And I'll always prefer that people are in good standing in the WoT to use it.
midnightmagic: mircea_popescu: I'd like to start pointing people away from proofofexistence and other incompatible nonsense and IIRC,
deedbot is careful/efficient in how it stores stuff in the blockchain. If that is so, I'd like to point newbs at.. like a website or something, if it exists.
midnightmagic: Is there somewhere I can read more about how
deedbot works under the hood and where I can find its proofs and such?
trinque: punkman: yeah I'm telling him to either upload the key or feed it directly into
deedbot-
assbot: You rated user trinque on 17-Oct-2014, with a rating of 3, and supplied these additional notes: Nice work on the
deedbot.
trinque: I've wanted to move
deedbot- off that for a while anyway
trinque: in my case a
deedbot- user would notice the rejected: 1 and complain to me
ascii_field: mircea_popescu: my point was precisely that it is a spurious distinction, and that i do not make it in the system; and that anyone who wants to try to be remembered as the first one to pen a particular patch had better
deedbot his signature
ascii_field: mircea_popescu: the only timestamps worth anything are
deedbot's
ascii_field: trinque, mircea_popescu, et al: there is another fine point re: 'v' that i'm a little surprised nobody asked about. how it does not distinguish signers from authors. it does not do this because it is physically impossible, other than via
deedbot etc., and i am not in the business of promising the impossible.
assbot: Successfully added a rating of 2 for trinque with note: maker and maintainer of
deedbot- in #b-a. helpful fellow.
punkman: trinque: would
deedbot notice a bundle tx that got reorg'd out of main chain?
mod6: trinque: just have to wait until next block before it shows up in the
deedbot.org list?
kakobrekla: trinque voice part is session based, bot was restarted to ignore
deedbot- rss links
trinque: PSA: I'm moving the blockchain for
deedbot- to a larger volume, during which it will reject all deeds.
assbot: Successfully added a rating of 1 for trinque with note:
deedbot-
lobbes: !rate trinque 1
deedbot-
lobbes: ;;later tell trinque is
deedbot- handling phuctor now too? No worries either way; I just want to make sure our gears are turning in-sync
pete_dushenski: we'll now see how
deedbot-'s immune system holds up against it
trinque: kakobrekla: at the time I wrote
deedbot- there was an agreement that the thing should voice itself when I asked you to autovoice it.
trinque: maybe assbot could ignore
deedbot- ^
trinque: bout to bring a
deedbot- feeds module online
felipelalli: trinque, ah, lol, amazing. thank you! The
deedbot link didn't work when I tried to enter in it. My idea was to be able to rate an "abstract entity" that could represents a person or company that wasn't registered on WoT.