2600+ entries in 0.13s
Framedragger: mircea_popescu are you referring to the time-honoured "put some irc logs into
deedbot" practice? :D (that i'd seen)
mircea_popescu: Framedragger we do also have a scheme whereby we save the plain data and
deedbot under consideration, but meh.
trinque: worked fine; I move
deedbot to trb to lean on trb
a111: Logged on 2016-12-17 18:26 mircea_popescu: but the point of
deedbot is to contain signed matter intended for human hands ; it is why the signed matter intended for machine processing is a separate mechanism.
mircea_popescu: but the point of
deedbot is to contain signed matter intended for human hands ; it is why the signed matter intended for machine processing is a separate mechanism.
☟︎ mircea_popescu: asciilifeform what is the matter with sending to
deedbot the item #1 wrapped in a "This is a notarized version of the original root of the so and so project, prepared for this and that etc" ?
mod6: I think it would be really cool to have something like !!
deedbot <wotpaste_of_vpatch> <pgp_sig_of_wotpaste_vpatch>
mod6: if I were him, this is what I would do: take the schematic blob, encode it, clearsign it with a note at the top and a hash of its output value. submit to
deedbot. next, edit the code somewhere or prefereably create a README.txt that points to that deed, create a new fuckgoats_genesis.vpatch and fuckgoats_genesis.vpatch.alf.sig on nosuchlabs.com, point to them with your www.
mod6: there may be some better solution to this with
deedbot.
Framedragger: (but i think i got it why you don't want binary tarball - it'd sure be nice to be able to host a plaintext package, with v sigs etc right there. hm. but then why
deedbot the *whole* thing - why not
deedbot only hashes of tarball version of webthing. make webthing available to view, but also for those who wish to verify via
deedbot, too, make tarball available. not pretty, but worx for *now*.)
mircea_popescu: you point to
deedbot which contains signed tarball. what's the problem ?
Framedragger: asciilifeform: *for the time being*, can you not hash the package, and
deedbot clearsigned hash of package?
mod6: then this is a question for trinque; he'll know if
deedbot can or can't deal with .sig files.
mircea_popescu: in other news, btcbase logs 889
deedbot-reported recent phuctorings since april 30th, or about
mircea_popescu: ben_vulpes i'm not altogether certain how it'd work, but basically i'd like it if mimisbrunnr allowed me to buy storage on wotpaste. i could pay from trinque 's
deedbot once it's done ; and i should be able to buy by the gb of storage or by the tb of traffic.
mircea_popescu: so what are you sauing here, gotta expand
deedbot format so it also accepts btc-dev detached sigs ?
mircea_popescu: but if that's what it is - neither v nor
deedbot need fixing for it.
trinque: release and I'll build into
deedbot mircea_popescu: incidentally asciilifeform : as a palleative : could we actually just fucking edit koch-rsa so that "----" rather than "-" becomes a symbol and deploy this on
deedbot ?
phf: trinque wants me to
deedbot logs, and if it only takes clearsigns, that would be kind of tricky.
phf: huh, i didn't know that. i thought
deedbot takes binary blobs sort of deal
phf: i guess
deedbot does something it shouldn't do..
phf: asciilifeform: i think the solution that we arrived at is that you just paste the two pastebot urls clear and sig and i pick them up. so if you want to
deedbot them, just do that, and you can assume that it'll end up in btcbase
shinohai: returned 22:08
deedbot shinohai updated rating of trinque from 3 to 3 <<
deedbot, lisp, trb
mircea_popescu: we should get our key registered with the
deedbot and read up the topic / do something useful with ourselves.
EDLionX: im just trying to import me gpg to
deedbot Framedragger: (i guess WoT trust had been simply deferred to
deedbot until those points in time, etc)
Framedragger: mircea_popescu: but what oftentimes ends up happening when you request key from
deedbot is that the requester then promptly uses that key to encrypt $text, and ping recipient with a public url to $text. the fact that there's been no mitm, i think, only shows that the lizards do not find this place important enough (for better or worse, etc)
Framedragger: and how the hell do you know that what thing-calling-self-
deedbot gave you over fleanode is thing-you-requested?
trinque: inb4 every
deedbot published item is a terrorist hash
mod6: I should clearsign the pubkey with my pgp-pubkey and
deedbot this, aha?
mircea_popescu:
http://btcbase.org/log/2016-12-02#1576781 << actually, it IS the present trinque, and must be. in order to voice itself, the guy named trinque must talk to
deedbot, and reply with the right challenge. so yes we forced the shitty freenode name system into a very strong thing.
☝︎ mircea_popescu:
http://btcbase.org/log/2016-12-02#1576690 << too many ifs ; and for that matter the problem of "what to do with the intestate" is unsolvable in the general sense. the best approach is for the man to write a fucking testament already. there's
deedbot for this purpose, it is wrong to you know, have an ethereum-powered mechanism to decide FOR gauss what of the coffin liners should be rescued.
☝︎ mircea_popescu: one particular angle would be that if we generate republic-rsa keys (see
http://btcbase.org/log/2016-08-18#1524210 eg) as opposed to koch-rsa keys then yes eulora server will have to dump its privately maintained wot to
deedbot periodically ; but on the upside we get very cheap transition to the new format while maintaining all the backwards compatibility one could want.
☝︎ ben_vulpes: oh come now you had the keys out when decrypting
deedbot's pad
trinque: this was the problem mod6 had with signing the dependency turds thrown into
deedbot phf: i missed the part where wot was going to be integrated into eulora? i know that
deedbot was mentioned
trinque: this bottle is also somehow distinct from the bottle where
deedbot is currently lying to him
a111: Logged on 2016-12-02 14:56 mircea_popescu: trinque here's a strategic point for your consideration : eulora will move to a rsa auth model sometime next year. this means the client generates itself a key, and talks to the server. i don't want to create a special
deedbot for eulora, and so, how do we best interoperate them so that i have rate and deeds in-game ? (ideally the wot visualisations and other such beauty also)
mircea_popescu: trinque here's a strategic point for your consideration : eulora will move to a rsa auth model sometime next year. this means the client generates itself a key, and talks to the server. i don't want to create a special
deedbot for eulora, and so, how do we best interoperate them so that i have rate and deeds in-game ? (ideally the wot visualisations and other such beauty also)
☟︎ trinque: namecheap deleted the wot.
deedbot.org record without being told!
trinque added l2 to wot.
deedbot.org index page, looks like happy trollface nao
mircea_popescu: BingoBoingo can have blockquote for the
deedbot bit plox ?
shinohai: I was hacking around with a bash function so I could view wot in w3m, was driving me crazy until I realized wot.
deedbot.com doesn't recognize fingerprints in all caps