1900+ entries in 0.174s
mod6: shinohai: sure will do. it's just the eatblock
test. once it's complete, i'll re-run all of the charts & metrics
mod6: In other news, my eatblock re-
test is at 433K+ & into blk0042; not much more to go there...
mod6: also, eatblock
test is no around 411K bocks and into blk0034... so should be done in a day or two.
mod6: Running another
test against the same phyiscal fg right now (figure I'll do three per unit).
mod6: Eatblock
test upto 363K+ blocks and into blk0019.
mod6: I'm doing that
test next.
mod6: alright, mircea_popescu & asciilifeform ; full offline eatblock
test is running again
jurov: on the yes
test, i got warning:
mod6: i'll try that next time i run a
test.
trinque: gives one fail on "address
test" before it's gone for good.
trinque: x1 carbon's got bad ram, actually freezes its own firmware memory
test.
mod6: I think I just reached the end of my eatblock
test...
mod6: gonna see what those results look like... then will probably continue on and
test the remainder of the fgs I've got.
mod6: asciilifeform: werd. anyway, it's exciting to
test these.
mod6: I'll
test all of my other units in this same fashion too.
mod6: anyway, just wanted to be /sure/ that I wasn't getting some sort of varient
test results from the dh.
mod6: i'll include the advanced
test parts before publication.
mod6: So I collected 1.2Gb worth of data from FG. Which for the Advanced
test I don't think would be a problem... about to do the `ent` & `dieharder` tests.
a111: Logged on 2017-04-14 14:57 mod6: with both of my RNG-TWs connected, it was collecting at about 7kB/s ... for that quick 10s
test or so to ensure that it was a "full speed"
mod6: with both of my RNG-TWs connected, it was collecting at about 7kB/s ... for that quick 10s
test or so to ensure that it was a "full speed"
☟︎ mod6: fg advanced
test update: i've collected about 500Mb so far. ~half way there.
Framedragger tried fg last weekend, was all good, (very) small sample (2.7MB) had 7.999936 bits of entropy per byte. but yet to
test more thoroughly, including removing shields, etc.
mod6: a good
test either way.
mircea_popescu: !!deed for instance works fine by my eyes, but it does not pass the "monkey do, monkey see"
test.
a111: Logged on 2017-04-09 13:48 BenBE: I'm the maintainer of the GeSHi syntax highlighter for PHP, which is used in e.g. Wikipedia for source highlighting of articles. Also working on several crypto-related projects like my own TLS/SSL
test, a collection of publicly-known set of compromised keys, an OpenSource management software for handling X.509 certificate issuance for a certificate authority.
BenBE: I'm the maintainer of the GeSHi syntax highlighter for PHP, which is used in e.g. Wikipedia for source highlighting of articles. Also working on several crypto-related projects like my own TLS/SSL
test, a collection of publicly-known set of compromised keys, an OpenSource management software for handling X.509 certificate issuance for a certificate authority.
☟︎ mircea_popescu: i can see the theoretical "benchmarks" online too. the problem is they're bs, "
test file generated by seq 100mn". hurr. how about generate a file with lines of random length between 1kb and 1mb, then benchmark it.
phf: a sentence like "hello world this is
test" might get an invocation like render("world this") followed by render("hello") followed by render("is
test"), simply because higher level widget engine decided that's the order of exposure, or hierarchy, or whatever
ben_vulpes: currently attempting to reason about differences between targets bitcoind and test_bitcoin
ben_vulpes: anyways, hey asciilifeform have you ever built the trb
test target?
Framedragger: asciilifeform: ack! got yer package after customs cleared it. visually looks intact and in good order. (won't be able to
test it till ~weekend)
trinque: runs (for example) a
test server for deedbot just fine
a111: Logged on 2017-03-20 01:04 Framedragger: sure. my internal alfatron says "may as well
test for tape backup storage system viability" though; surely it's inefficient to
test *all* things in a domain that one is not optimistic to begin with. but i see your rationale of course
Framedragger: sure. my internal alfatron says "may as well
test for tape backup storage system viability" though; surely it's inefficient to
test *all* things in a domain that one is not optimistic to begin with. but i see your rationale of course
☟︎ mircea_popescu: wtf is this. did it
test out ok ? did the pos just die ? WHO THE FUCK DOES THIS
phf: aah, yeah, i'll
test it in xl
phf: i'm not sure if it's working, it's from a "possibly broken" box, but i can lend you that one after i
test it in my ivory, and if you have a viable project of some sort, i can probably get you more
mircea_popescu: altogether not a bad idea to make a set of
test chains as per the tsting discussion last week. this can surely be both part of it and the incentive to do it.
mod6: There has been an automated
test added for this as well.
mod6: this change is pretty trivial. probably will update V99994 before it comes out (was about to release this weekend). will need to add at least an automated
test too. not a big deal.
mircea_popescu: makefile bs. alright, well, i guess we'll need a
test for file exists or some such hair.
mod6: let me dig it up -- bumeanwhile, it's regarding src/obj, src/obj/nogui, src/obj/
test mircea_popescu: this is no kind of argument against having
test suite.
mircea_popescu: prolly but that's finnickyer. unless of course we bother to create 3rd item here, which would be a
test chain.
ben_vulpes: should even be possible to
test reorg behavior!
mircea_popescu: prolly should churn the chain as a
test yeh. also a tx fuzzer would be great in general.
ben_vulpes: i went so far as to set up a solipsistic
test net before bumping into the dumb-as-rocks "needs 2 nodes in order to mine" shit
mircea_popescu: i've not seen any. would be more interesting to
test for the hole manually by fuzzing on testnet
Framedragger: hey, you wanted some fs
test, i'm just reporting on levels of shittiness found
Framedragger: but on the other hand this'd benchmark/
test directory traversal more.
Framedragger: will get a way to
test real disk soon, didn't want to run on personal trashy PC, hence shitty server