2800+ entries in 0.29s
a111: Logged on 2016-09-13 03:11 ben_vulpes: asciilifeform: does your
trb node's memory usage grow unboundedly?
BingoBoingo: ben_vulpes: Restart every few weeks to back up blockchain. Is not
trb, but other on Openbsd with
trb shit bolted onto sides
ben_vulpes: asciilifeform: does your
trb node's memory usage grow unboundedly?
☟︎☟︎ mircea_popescu: incidentally, what's the current list of public
trb nodes ? i have -connect=108.31.170.49 54.187.227.228 46.166.165.30 91.218.246.31 172.86.178.46 50.168.67.12 of which a coupla be answering.
mircea_popescu: this said, i see absolutely no problem whatsoever implementing
trb nodes on sign-hello.
shinohai: Imma try and have it up by first of week, I got sidetracked with this
trb makefile thing
trinque: that said shinohai pls do not hook a cruddy anything to your
trb for your own sake.
shinohai: What were specs for a bot wallet anyway? There was a cruddy one written by gribble's author I started to hook to
trb one time but never finished
ascii_zimbabwe: i dun have this now only because it doesn't play well with
trb.
trinque: because
trb demons not fully enumerated
shinohai: All jhvh1 wants is to be sure you have a working copy of
trb when X-Day comes
mod6: <+asciilifeform> we burned it out of
trb with hot irons, first thing, for a reason. << werd. thx.
thestringpuller: asciilifeform: nah i'm sourcing it in my own docs. i'm doing a big write up of
trb for n00bs.
Framedragger: asciilifeform:
trb and mpex don't make themselves easy to be used by everyone. which YES is a great thing. but it's not because an angelic light shines upon them, repelling all evil.
davout: yeah sure, but that's kind of different from saying 'sucks because roger ver'. ver probably used the bitcoin client before it was set in stone for
trb gribble: trinque was last seen in #trilema 2 hours, 18 minutes, and 23 seconds ago: <trinque> mircea_popescu: aha, will keep running the latest
trb trinque: mircea_popescu: aha, will keep running the latest
trb mircea_popescu:
trb is however distinguished by being the most acceptant. so...
PeterL: but will
trb accept block with chain of transactions in it?
mircea_popescu: miner runnign
trb-esque thing only would not, right. the first gets cut off because fees, the second because unknown inputs.
PeterL: so miner running
trb-esque thing would not have second transaction
mircea_popescu: anyway ; it's evident that in the future republican code will have one of the two possible profiles (
trb-like ; eulora-like), not necessarily one, and certainly not necessarily the former.
phf: fwiw
trb and eulora have opposite goals as far as exposure
phf:
trb's build system is not sane
phf:
trb builds on three systems altogether, and it's still a pita
phf: asciilifeform: do you have a gnupg1 version, that can be used as a
trb-like base? i want to go through an execise of reading a diff between some version that can be relied on with all the disclaimers and whatever's in the trunk
a111: Logged on 2016-08-20 21:17 mod6: the goal is and remains this: get the
trb build infrastructure completed, once and for all. close out this portion of development with the completion of that (Makefiles) and a subsequent tying vpatch to mark the milestone.
shinohai: +mircea_popescu why not try playing it lol. you just wanna compile thangs ? lol, this is why I stick more on
trb side of things xD
a111: Logged on 2016-08-20 21:17 mod6: the goal is and remains this: get the
trb build infrastructure completed, once and for all. close out this portion of development with the completion of that (Makefiles) and a subsequent tying vpatch to mark the milestone.
mod6: the goal is and remains this: get the
trb build infrastructure completed, once and for all. close out this portion of development with the completion of that (Makefiles) and a subsequent tying vpatch to mark the milestone.
☟︎☟︎ mod6: pposed to replace it <+phf> instead. obviously this doesn't make for pretty graphs, so i don't upload it << yup. there's a planned vpatch for this. bunch of discussions. just been focusing my attention on
trb build stuff lately.
mod6: <+mircea_popescu> heh. aaand a
trb node is at height 419220 for absolutely no reason ; 50+ connections, stable etc. << did this get fixed? or is it stuck at that same block still?
a111: Logged on 2016-08-16 01:35 mod6: <+pete_dushenski> mod6: pleased to report that 99994k spins up on deb7 without fuss. only comment would be on '
trb-howto' to suggest '-lows' command when booting bitcoind for the first time. << hey! Thanks for testing that!
mircea_popescu: heh. aaand a
trb node is at height 419220 for absolutely no reason ; 50+ connections, stable etc.
mod6: <+pete_dushenski> mod6: pleased to report that 99994k spins up on deb7 without fuss. only comment would be on '
trb-howto' to suggest '-lows' command when booting bitcoind for the first time. << hey! Thanks for testing that!
☟︎ pete_dushenski: mod6: pleased to report that 99994k spins up on deb7 without fuss. only comment would be on '
trb-howto' to suggest '-lows' command when booting bitcoind for the first time.
mod6: essentially, i've taken all the buildroot deps (typically collected from the wan), along with the
trb deeds, placed them in a local dir with the build script (modified to suit this process) and launched.
mod6: So in test-land news; I've created a working totally off-line build for
trb.
mod6: asciilifeform: is nsa's
trb down?
a111: Logged on 2016-07-31 21:31 mod6: %p
trb 29
tb0t: Project:
trb, ID: 29, Type: F, Subject: Redesign Wallet, Antecedents: 30, Notes: The original Reference Implementation wallet needs a redesign.
trinque: tbot here is perl,
trb builder is either sh or Makefile
trinque: only reliable
trb node eh?
tb0t: Project:
trb, ID: 12, Type: F, Subject: Makefiles for building full orchastra, Antecedents: , Notes: