1800+ entries in 0.195s
mod6: just throwing a matrix together of all the
test data.
mod6: but the battery cell is somehow better for this
test?
mod6: makes sense, i think it was worth covering this though -- wanted to be sure that I have one solid
test-bed.
mircea_popescu: but the point is that their temple will never be put to the
test.
mod6: So that should conclude the collections for now. I'll be putting some effort into some fg-anal sometime soon -- maybe nothing more than some basic facts extrapolated from the
test results per collection and links to the raw results.
mod6: thanks! last dieharder
test is running now, actually.
mod6: Now, I just need to re-run one more
test from FG #2, then the collections will be complete, all using 'fullblock'.
IamAGirlsoInever: Oh, a
test from way back when, I implemented an XML reader and negelected to cap off recursion, so I tried a file full of <_> commands, just open a short tag.
IamAGirlsoInever:
test like science, double blind, use a premise, try to prove a point?
a111: Logged on 2017-05-24 22:16 asciilifeform: previously i thought that you could not have an auditable single-crystal rng, but possibly this is not so : if you make it so that only co-incident (on 2 detectors) gamma is picked up, you can 'yoke'-audit 2 units by placing back to back around
test source.
a111: Logged on 2017-05-25 03:08 mod6: !~later tell gabriel_laddel_p Let me know how much entropy you'd like, I'll run ent
test & dieharder against it, let you decide if you want it. I'll ask 0.1 BTC per Gb. What is your bid?
a111: Logged on 2017-05-25 03:08 mod6: !~later tell gabriel_laddel_p Let me know how much entropy you'd like, I'll run ent
test & dieharder against it, let you decide if you want it. I'll ask 0.1 BTC per Gb. What is your bid?
mod6: !~later tell gabriel_laddel_p Let me know how much entropy you'd like, I'll run ent
test & dieharder against it, let you decide if you want it. I'll ask 0.1 BTC per Gb. What is your bid?
☟︎☟︎ mircea_popescu: but this is not what you're asking, for a
test that sometimes finds something, is it.
mod6: re-doing the tests for FG1 and the first
test of FG2. Basically these were run prior to the 'fullblock' thread.
mod6: I was about to embark on some fg-anal, but realized that I needed to re-run all of the
test from FG #1 and one
test from FG #2 -- as those were run before the thread about dd 'fullblock'.
Framedragger: "We intended to
test the hypothesis that flattery of the academic Left’s moral architecture in general, and of the moral orthodoxy in gender studies in particular, is the overwhelming determiner of publication in an academic journal in the field." noshit.jpg but also applause.jpg
a111: Logged on 2016-08-19 15:26 asciilifeform: (interest in the subj is slim, on account of miller-rabin probabilistic
test provably converging - i.e. probability of catastrophic failure can be made smaller than probability of machine flattened by asteroid the same night)
a111: Logged on 2017-05-14 05:12 asciilifeform: if it works on arbitrary addrs, seems like it'd be wuite asy to
test ben_vulpes: relatedly, i have a patch in abeyance that fixes the
test target. i'll bring that out of the refrigerator and start wiring this new IsMine implementation into it.
ben_vulpes: i'm going to step away from testing the indexer /in toto/, and plug this IsMine overload into the
test target
mircea_popescu: "very confused salesman"
test. i gotta remember this one.
ben_vulpes: i am considering testing this in conjunction with a solipsistic miner, but may
test it against the extant blockchain instead. input on this also welcome
ben_vulpes: now i have to decide how to
test it, for the odds are that it does not work as-written. but i do invite commentary on the design!
BingoBoingo: In other things, sync
test is now within 1500 blox
Framedragger: re. per minute, i guess i should reach out to consult first eh - this was borne from a solipsistic "me as a customer" consideration: e.g. i want to
test out some trb feature across multiple different instances, i need good i/o and memory; monthly costs would not be trivial (for the purpose at hand), so i wish to be charged on smaller timescales.
mats: the provided answer was - first
test for Intel CPU with CPUID (so you don't trigger f00f) and then for anything GenuineIntel, run it and check for undefined opcode exception
mats: relatedly - a trivia q i didn't know the answer to, until it was shared - what is the proper way to
test for support for the cmpxchg8b instruction?
ben_vulpes: current thinking in re testing dumper is to solo mine and
test but that's a not-small pile of
test harness to write
ben_vulpes: gotta back out the c++11 work, implement a predicate and
test the shit out of it
mod6: doesn't probably do us all justice if I run some of these
test collections on some shitty hardware i may or may not have.
mod6: once all 5 are done, i'll pull together something more comprehensive for comparison; currently, i just have the raw output
test data.
mircea_popescu: i figure we can afford a
test unit for some dude you read.