log☇︎
49 entries in 0.474s
mircea_popescu: god knows all my attempts to dialogue, from http://trilema.com/surprised-by-joy-the-shape-of-my-early-life-adnotated to http://trilema.com/2017/the-ethics-of-liberty-by-murray-n-rothbard-adnotated-part-vi-a-crusoe-social-philosophy/ to http://trilema.com/2014/on-the-superiority-of-monarchy-or-adnotations-to-why-the-worst-get-on-top/ to what have you are entirely indistinguishable from "one day, mp decided to pay $x a visit ;
a111: Logged on 2018-02-05 08:36 mircea_popescu: btw, from the wonders of mp-wp : the above "cut" link ( http://trilema.com/the-ethics-of-liberty-by-murray-n-rothbard-adnotated-part-vi-a-crusoe ) STILL RESOLVES FINE. because mp-wp is set up to do that, for greatere glory.
mircea_popescu: btw, from the wonders of mp-wp : the above "cut" link ( http://trilema.com/the-ethics-of-liberty-by-murray-n-rothbard-adnotated-part-vi-a-crusoe ) STILL RESOLVES FINE. because mp-wp is set up to do that, for greatere glory. ☟︎
mircea_popescu: ial. http://trilema.com/talent-triumphant-or-on-empathy << this is a rewritten book, originally "micuta/n-a dansat decit o vara". http://trilema.com/resplenduminous << idem rewritten book ; then there's the whole rothbardf series, from http://trilema.com/the-ethics-of-liberty-by-murray-n-rothbard-adnotated-part-i-natural-law-and-reason to http://trilema.com/the-ethics-of-liberty-by-murray-n-rothbard-adnotated-part-vi-a-crusoe
mircea_popescu: of course, merely quantitative approaches do not work, lest you end up with a http://trilema.com/2017/the-ethics-of-liberty-by-murray-n-rothbard-adnotated-part-vi-a-crusoe-social-philosophy/#selection-299.0-299.217 style hacker in those entreprising new worlds bereft of any serious thought.
mircea_popescu: others are adnotations, like the recent rothbard series for instance.
mircea_popescu: and that's a minor example. consider rothbard's utter failure to mean or matter, as sadly chronicled on trilema. yes, he's intellectually negligible, but the chief problem that renders him moot is the extreme poverty and ineptitude of his references! which is not his problem, but the 1st gen in shoes folks' problem, and the deep reason us can't and hasn't spoken in the forum of human thought.
mircea_popescu: no shit, rothbard was here ?
mircea_popescu: phf also worth bearing in mind that point re introductions in the rothbard series. people more recent than the author daring to pen introductions are the exact equivalents of herostratus ; and to be treated no better.
mircea_popescu: i thought rothbard was a catholic dood ?
mircea_popescu: babbage says the same thing, "oh, americans just wanted to know how they could rothbard this item"
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform you know, here's what i can't put to rest : it's not JUST fucking joseph smith, "o i heard them fine folks in rome have this religion thing, ima make one myself out of shit around my log cabin". he's one of the more ridiculous exponents, yes, but he's in no way marginal. not at all. murray rothbard is exactly "oh i heard them folks in paris have a philosophy, ima make one out of old shit in demolished us protest
mircea_popescu: nevertheless, the problem here is the reverse : "my eyes will jump out of my head if they have to read a single other page of this rothbard ; best i stop that and go build eye cages"
mircea_popescu: this is what i want. we gotta produce some literature at the lest on the level of huxley, or else liberty will forever be oppressed by the komodo dragon breath of rand and rothbard and whatnot talented poets of the silver tay.
BingoBoingo: <mircea_popescu> liber-rothbards whatever are so poorly received by the anglo left. they prolly tried to read rothbard and fell over. << AHA, this IS the anglophone problem. Not much in the language that isn't worse than Rothbard. English gives you Twain, William James, and Shakespeare. Everthing else is translated into the language.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform btw, the ~only actually interesting point the rothbard expedition yielded hasn't much at all to do with rothbard, of course. http://trilema.com/2017/the-ethics-of-liberty-by-murray-n-rothbard-adnotated-part-i-natural-law-and-reason/#footnote_3_73699
mircea_popescu: in fact, the canon is shockingly dumb. there's that blavatsky-wannabe with her utterly unreadable 600 pages atlas thing. there's rothbard, which is about as terrible as trying to read http://www.mcgonagall-online.org.uk/works
mircea_popescu: liber-rothbards whatever are so poorly received by the anglo left. they prolly tried to read rothbard and fell over.
deedbot: http://trilema.com/2017/the-ethics-of-liberty-by-murray-n-rothbard-adnotated-part-vi-a-crusoe-social-philosophy/ << Trilema - The Ethics of Liberty, by Murray N Rothbard. Adnotated. Part VI (A Crusoe Social Philosophy)
mircea_popescu: rothbard's a fucktard wtf is wrong with people.
deedbot: http://trilema.com/2017/the-ethics-of-liberty-by-murray-n-rothbard-adnotated-part-v-the-task-of-political-philosophy/ << Trilema - The Ethics of Liberty, by Murray N Rothbard. Adnotated. Part V (The Task of Political Philosophy)
ascii_modem: also read mircea_popescu's new series. i gotta learn where he buys his gas masks, i was never able to stomach even this amt of rothbard anglotardism, even for entomological work
deedbot: http://trilema.com/2017/the-ethics-of-liberty-by-murray-n-rothbard-adnotated-part-iv-natural-law-and-natural-rights/ << Trilema - The Ethics of Liberty, by Murray N Rothbard. Adnotated. Part IV (Natural Law and Natural Rights)
deedbot: http://trilema.com/2017/the-ethics-of-liberty-by-murray-n-rothbard-adnotated-part-iii-natural-law-versus-positive-law/ << Trilema - The Ethics of Liberty, by Murray N Rothbard. Adnotated. Part III (Natural Law versus Positive Law)
deedbot: http://trilema.com/2017/the-ethics-of-liberty-by-murray-n-rothbard-adnotated-part-ii-natural-law-as-science/ << Trilema - The Ethics of Liberty, by Murray N Rothbard. Adnotated. Part II (Natural Law as "Science")
mircea_popescu: in other news, rothbard is getting massacred.
deedbot: http://trilema.com/2017/the-ethics-of-liberty-by-murray-n-rothbard-adnotated-part-i-natural-law-and-reason/ << Trilema - The Ethics of Liberty, by Murray N Rothbard. Adnotated. Part I (Natural Law and Reason)
a111: 20 results for "rothbard", http://btcbase.org/log-search?q=rothbard
mircea_popescu: !#s rothbard
thestringpuller: so been reading about mises and rothbard and anarcho-capitalism. i think the "majority revolting" isn't revolting about an issue, but subconsciously rejecting the anarcho-capitalist nature of bitcoin.
gribble: MO-Piftel Cenzurat de Darius Iurca - YouTube: <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43tDr9XndEE>; Galben de metil - Wikipedia: <http://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galben_de_metil>; Murray Rothbard - Wikipedia: <http://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murray_Rothbard>
mircea_popescu: decimation i think his point stands tho, rothbard never said it, and what idiots trying to be "rothbardian" understood of it all isn't really relevant.
dignork: decimation: Rothbard never claimed people would 'play nice', just that current system of control is fucked up.
asciilifeform: i wish we could ask herr rothbard about the market value of... ebola.
Adlai: obligatory rothbard quote, "the purely free society will have a flourishing free market in children"
mircea_popescu: which is why you imagine satoshi to be a rothbard tool.
Dimsler: he fucking read murray rothbard and applied his idiotic quantitive theory of money
chetty: http://www.lewrockwell.com/2014/09/murray-n-rothbard/why-the-power-elite-loves-equality/
wywialm: Apocalyptic, no, it's a standard definition, contrary to late Mises and Rothbard, and avoids much confusion
thestringpuller: murray rothbard
mircea_popescu: so basically in rothbard's reading, this rand character is the quintessential balabusta, a staid, obnoxious, overarching yet profoundly ignorant and puritanical fat old woman.
mircea_popescu: (quote via rockwell's restatement of rothbard's rand commentary)
asciilifeform: http://archive.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/rothbard23.html
thestringpuller: you'd probably like murray rothbard too
thestringpuller: ;;later tell mircea_popescu http://mises.org/money/2s10.asp MPOE is Rothbard's vision.
thestringpuller: You don't like Murray Rothbard?
thestringpuller: mircea_popescu: do you like rothbard? http://www.amazon.com/What-Government-Money-Percent-Dollar/dp/0945466447/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1355158265&sr=8-2&keywords=what+has+government+done+to+our+money
thestringpuller: i mispoke, i forget I"m speaking to mr. rothbard and not mr. keynes (i kid), value creates income streams in which other people can access a job is merely trading time and some kind of skill to contribute to the business in exchange for access to the revenue stream
JohnSmith777: now I am not here to advocate FREE MARKETS!!!111 and Murray Rothbard