3100+ entries in 0.4s
funkenstein_: which unfortunately uses java 8, and when I was trying to
test I didn't even get as far as building OpenJDK 8
ben_vulpes: dun see how the
test value gets passed to the function invocations
ben_vulpes: = (
test) ? (val if
test returns true) : (val if
test returns false)
mod6: or upgrade to a much more uplevel version of gcc to
test and see if that works instead. iirc, version 5.x included a fix for this? maybe 4.9.x did too.
mod6: I, with trinque's help, need to patch gcc 4.8.4 with gentoo using /etc/portage/patches via ebuild flag(?). If that works, then I can
test that the R.I. will link properly. If that works, maybe we finally have static apple pie.
mircea_popescu: ben_vulpes no, this is a temporary
test thing, to see just how bad alf's latest butchery affects things
mod6: <+mircea_popescu> ben_vulpes would the foundation spin up an aws and run this ? << I can
test this with my aws, sure. unless you guys are proposing something else i.e. spinning up our own ircd
mircea_popescu: i'm not gonna run it up myself because she was instrumented to
test i dun recall what and i fear messing it up.
mircea_popescu: this is a subtle but perhaps excellent
test for distinguishing the categories you proposed
mircea_popescu: "A second poster tried the
test, but botched the implementation, proving only that with diligence it is possible to make anything run slowly."
shinohai: Most people cba with
test kits, and instead just put whatever substance they get in the mail inside them.
kakobrekla: ascii_field i think nubbins` volunteers to be your
test subject
mod6: (others are welcome to
test these as well, ofc)
mod6: np. so, i'm gonna keep focus on this Gentoo GCC patching stuff for the time being. But meanwhile I do that on my POS box (Now running Gentoo AMD64 hardened w/uclibc), I can shutdown the Gentoo aws instance and fire-up a deb6
test with these new patches before the end of the month I'm sure.
mod6: <+ascii_field> mod6: how are those
test rigs doing ? < << If you mean the bitcoin-v0.5.3.1-RELEASE + patch(s) { Orphanage Thermonuke + TX Orphanage Amputation }, they were performed on AWS deb6 instance and have since been shutdown after full sync & performance tests completed. Main reason being to dig into compiling v0.5.3.1 + gentoo sanity patches with uclibc on Gentoo on AWS Gentoo instance. I try to only run one instance at a time to keep mo
menahem: danielpbarron PayPal is up - had it in
test mode. My bad.
mircea_popescu: will the computer
test if the thing it is testing has met the
test or merely circumvented the
test ?
decimation: because they assign their indian h1b to
test the chip
decimation: this is a problem with
test equipment in general
mod6: but im positive that i'd never get it configured correctly to use uclibc and whatever other configurations are required to even
test this patch. even if I get the patch to work, how am I supposed to get this into such a state that someone else can repeat it?
mats: get a 'walking profile' so you don't even hafta run the distance in fitness
test.
mircea_popescu: the only half decent approximation of a
test would be, "either you go to school where each day for a year contains a beating, or else we kill you in six years".
mod6: hi ascii_modem. I've got igprof built, and i tested it with the
test code in the COMPILE.txt file. i've got your igprof_hooks patch applied to the v0.5.3.1-RELEASE source, and i've built it dynamically.
mod6: as as separate note, I will not be running NMON with this full-sync
test -- I want to get as clean of a igprof profile as I can. Don't want any thing else to disturb it's collection.
trinque: jurov: I have no windoze box to
test with, but will be derping with gentoo 64 tomorrow
decimation: Spandrell made another good point in his next post: "Say a woman that gets a job before of a female quota, but is chosen specifically because she isn?t a loud feminist and does not abuse her legal privilege. Will she ever abandon feminism? Most likely not. After all she owes her job to feminism, even if she had to take a second sanity
test. But she has nothing to win, and quite a lot to lose from abolishing female quotas."
assbot: Logged on 02-06-2015 19:32:18; jurov: everyone just copies the clearsigned
test and pastes it to wordpress
mircea_popescu: so they just throw things at it. "Can't hurt, right ?" "
test more things"
shinohai: I need to set up an image to
test on. I was gonna try an Arch image.
mod6: unless you wanna
test those seperately from your v0.5.3.1-RELEASE version
jurov: everyone just copies the clearsigned
test and pastes it to wordpress
☟︎ Landgull: Well, they wanted 150k for a stress
test.
Landgull: I don't think he liked the results of the stress
test.
williamdunne thinks bringing a business plan here is the best stress
test available
williamdunne: flyplymouth: Not sure how that works, so I won't comment. Anyhow. How do you stress
test a business plan?
flyplymouth: Stress
test the business model to see if passenger numbers stack up and ticket prices.
punkman: my
test was with foundation bitcoind before the release though
mod6: ok, drove all over timbuktu and got a rebuilt pos box to
test out this gentoo stuff.
mod6: <+asciilifeform> for example, anyone try a uclibc build yet ? << I was planning to
test this on the gentoo box that I built, but it was AWS. I'm going to be picking up a cheap box this weekend to finish up the gentoo guide & then
test how it compiles with uclibc afterward. I'm putting in a line about it in the SoBA this month.
BingoBoingo: Most people who self diagnose salmonella usually actually
test positive for campylobacter anyways when chikken makes em sick
mircea_popescu: imagine the "stress
test" if the blocks ACTUALLY WERE 20mb.
cazalla: some coincidence a bunch of folk on /r/bitcoin get together to stress
test the same day gavin threatens to take his ball/bat and go home with hearn
mod6: btw my
test with both of your patches {thermonuke} + {tx amputation} is at 193988
mod6: well, was going to launch this for a full sync
test.
ascii_field: mircea_popescu: replace the
test in your copy of 'litmus' with this.
mod6: alright, have the v0.5.3 Original nmon results up -- I'm moving all of these results in to a more organized dir structure.. (the originals will remain for now since it seems people are still looking at them); one can navigate all of these charts by release & by date tested here:
http://thebitcoin.foundation/test/perf/ jurov: yep. unless the trading bot comes here and passes the turing
test :D
gabriel_laddel: ^ It appears that I should properly make the business case. If the unix in question had a sane substitute for portage (clearly specified set of systems guaranteed to build for a specified set of versions, no cyclic dependencies when you try to enable the USE flag for docs globally, sane CLOS structuring of the systems, `build' builds, `
test' tests
Hasimir: also, see if you can
test this key ID: 0xCC61ADFF159B44ED (another one missing a UID, but in this case it was made in '94, by a certain expat aussie residing in an Ecuadorian embassy in London ...)
decimation: right, which is why usg isn't going to
test it again
Hasimir: mircea_popescu, I'm happy to
test on the systems I've got here or have access to, but that's not a broad range
mod6: <+jurov> mod6, ben_vulpes, everyone:
http://bluesky/ml/test/patches.html needs to manually fill data for "Released in/Based on" columns - just version strings for every patch, help appreciated << this is 404 for me.
BingoBoingo: <asciilifeform> meowmix is, i think, a script. << More likely meat that fails turing
test ascii_field: i will be very surprised when a 'proper' pubkey that some fella actually has on his own box, fails the
test mircea_popescu: anyway, you could just run a probabilistic
test on it.
mircea_popescu: "In March 2013, USAF
test pilots, flying with pre-operational software that did not utilize the all-aspect infrared AAQ-37 DAS sensor, noted a lack of visibility from the F-35 cockpit during evaluation flights, which would get them consistently shot down in combat."
mircea_popescu: dja want me to publish the actual archive as spit out by the
test ?
ben_vulpes: 21 doesn't pass the even-barely-making-sense
test.
mod6: we'll be correlating all the data and putting together a bit of a press-release and notes along with it as soon as the v0.5.3 perf
test is complete
mod6: <+asciilifeform> mod6: 3 ? <+mod6> Ok, the v0_5_3_1-RELEASE performance
test is complete. Charts are posted here if you'd like to view:
http://thebitcoin.foundation/v0_5_3_1-RELEASE-Charts/ <+mod6> You'll notice that there are two times that during the full blockchain sync, bitcoind got oomkill'd. <+mod6> Again, this is just the bitcoin-v0_5_3_1-RELEASE -- no patches added. <+mod6> And for reference, here's where you can view the performance tes