asciilifeform: ( implementation becomes an underhanded-C-contest in concealing the fact of ~any~ box running the idiocy reverting to nullcipher on demand ) ☟︎

asciilifeform: because all of it is really a game of underhanded c contest .

asciilifeform: these have 0 'underhanded c contest' appeal, it's straight club in your face.

asciilifeform: in other 'news', this year's underhanded c contest is a lul: http://underhanded-c.org/#summary

asciilifeform: idk about the lot of you, but i am not inclined to play 'underhanded c contest' for this.

asciilifeform: mats: ever play 'underhanded c contest' ?

asciilifeform: if the effect were not so brute, it would've made a good star in an 'underhanded c contest' entry.

asciilifeform: you can't even win 'underhanded c contest' with them. they're ~screamingly~ bad ideas. ☟︎

asciilifeform: 'The program performs unsafe 32-bit arithmetic, leading to an invalid size check prior to a memcpy() operation, leading to a heap overflow.' << can we plz haz shitgnomes playing 'underhanded c contest' prior to employment? these old idiocies are getting - well - old.

asciilifeform: until this happens, we're playing 'underhanded c contest'

asciilifeform: (or simply inept players of 'underhanded c contest')

asciilifeform: !s underhanded c contest

asciilifeform: underhanded c contest << and yes, that's a brand-new one!

asciilifeform will sign own code (cardano) with 'will die by this' seal. will not sign other folks' code, unless compensated to actually put in the time to play 'reverse underhanded c contest.' << not cheap

asciilifeform: ;;google underhanded c contest

asciilifeform: more likely than borked crypto is 'underhanded c contest' shenanigans.