1312 entries in 0.667s
mircea_popescu: <mike_c> oh its going << all up to
gavin at this point.
mircea_popescu: i suppose the part where satoshi pretty much left because he couldn't believe just how fucking idiotic
gavin is doesn't really make the cut of what reddit likes to discuss huh.
mircea_popescu:
Gavin Andresen: Um... I haven't had email from satoshi in a couple months actually. The last email I sent him I actually told him I was going to talk at the CIA. So it's possible , that.... that may have um had something to with his deciding"
mircea_popescu: "oh look, what mp said back in october when he was being nice about it is a lot easier to follow than what he's saying now, once the fuckwits in question ignored the polite approach. isn't it mp's fault that
gavin is an idiot!"
mircea_popescu: "[EDIT] There is an explanation of the possible problem with increasing the block size in the comment section here
Gavin Andresen Proposes Scalability Roadmap and Hardfork, which is much more informative that Mr Popsescu's own vindictive rambling."
mircea_popescu: is it obvious why this is retarded or do i have to make a part 3 of "why
gavin followers are dumb" list ?
mircea_popescu: Everyone not on
Gavin's side on this all act like low / zero fee transactions just disappear into the ether. They most certainly do not. If (when) the average block size exceeds 1MB these lower fee transactions will overrun the entire system. Servers running bitcoind will start swapping to disk instead of using memory. At that point the entire network would go down."
assbot: Let's address even more of the more common pseudo-arguments raised by the very stupid people that like the
Gavin scamcoin proposal pe Trilema - Un blog de Mircea Popescu. ... (
http://bit.ly/1BUG2tK )
mircea_popescu: "
Gavin is, by and large, a mentally retarded doofus displaying a shocking amount of Dunning-Kruger syndrome in his assorted dabblings in economics and other hard fields."
thestringpuller: anyone see this snippet quoting
Gavin, "Normal people, stay away from Bitcoin."
punkman: "For the amount of money that Theymos is paying these four twenty-somethings to make forum software, he could employ
Gavin Andresen full-time, six times over!"
mircea_popescu:
Gavin educates, make his points and tries convince community without antagonizing anyone. Popescu is probably the biggest jerk in the community, and his flock are such a dickheads that I'd be happy to see them using separate chain just so they can circlejerk and pretend they are the kings of the crypto-word in their own sandbox. Anything they write is so repugnant, that it's just impossible to argue with them. It's fun
mircea_popescu: inasmuch as the old thing is bitcoin, and the new thing some shit
gavin made.
assbot: Let's address some of the more common pseudo-arguments raised by the very stupid people that like the
Gavin scamcoin proposal pe Trilema - Un blog de Mircea Popescu. ... (
http://bit.ly/1w961XS )
mircea_popescu:
gavin does NOT have the authority to create a hard fork.
mircea_popescu: and as to the question of "how was
gavin turned", the answer is obvious : cultural immersion. he happens to be part of the problem, much like if you put ximenez in charge of the supreme court you'll get burnings at the stake out of the legal process irrespective what the laws say.
thestringpuller: This is about
Gavin proving he can hijack the Bitcoin network to whomever his handler may be.
mircea_popescu: so what's next, if this somehow succeeds ? two years from now, liberia uses bitcoin as nat'l currency, suddenly the workers go on strike, ask for double salaries. govt asks
gavin to fork btc to give them an extra one-off five million btc to pay the workers.
thestringpuller: I wonder how
Gavin got compromised. Will make for intersting movie one day.
thestringpuller: the alert keys are currently only held by
gavin and theymos?
thestringpuller: so in order to defend the attack
gavin would have to include code to keep 1:1 parity with the main-chain while his blocks are minted
mircea_popescu: they recently announced "they will focus on btc core", ie, "we can't afford anything past
gavin's salary". and not even that for all of 2015.
BingoBoingo: beautyon:
Gavin really doesn't even seem to like Bitcoin that much anymore.
mircea_popescu: doubt they will. some pool ops might be clueless enough to try and hijack the network to please
gavin/usg, but that's ok, they'll get shot later.
mircea_popescu: BingoBoingo am i thick or is the answer about as related to what it quotes as
gavin's "covered" is related to economy ?
mircea_popescu: davout there exists something like that already, "
gavin's orphan chain won't die before 50 block long"
thestringpuller: This bet resolves no if
Gavin's proposed hard fork is launched, and in succession achieves 51% consensus of the network. This bet resolves yes, if the current Bitcoin fork keeps 51% consensus of the network, or if
Gavin's proposed hard fork is never launched.
BingoBoingo: <mircea_popescu> this in case anyone wonders why i "have to" call
gavin an idiot. same reason you have to beat the donkey. only way it groks. << People don't deal with donkeys, they make Abbos sell them mules.
BingoBoingo: mircea_popescu: If they could math
gavin wouldn't have been derping recycled blocks in his hellchain
mircea_popescu: this in case anyone wonders why i "have to" call
gavin an idiot. same reason you have to beat the donkey. only way it groks.
mircea_popescu: BingoBoingo nah, they don't have the time.
gavin has to force it through rapidly, before blocks actually start regularly overflowing 1mn, because that's his only chance to get pools surrepetitiously mining v3 blocks while gavincoins not being massively doublespent.
BingoBoingo:
Gavin only wants BTC to die so he can sleep quietly at night while animals enjoy
Gavin's cardiac sashimi
mircea_popescu: palatial moment. when the derps in -dev discover that well...
gavin isn't really into bitcoin.
mircea_popescu: meanwhile,
gavin hasn't been on #bitcoin-dev in the past two weeks, and was mentioned maybe a coupla times in the interval.
thestringpuller: i'm visualizing a classroom full of students pointing and laughing at
Gavin while he struggles to find emotions and reactions
mircea_popescu: i'd bet you but we can't use bitbet because it doesn't take
gavin btc.
akisora: In the article linked in the reddit thestringpuller posted
Gavin said "2. There are special rules for 'coinbase' transactions: there can be only one coinbase transaction per block, it must be the first transaction, etc."
akisora: did
Gavin just say there are special rules for coinbase??
mircea_popescu: the block rewards keeps going down. how are they going to make money if there's no pressure on txn to pay ? is
gavin going to give them it ?
mircea_popescu: not what i've been hearing from teh chinese folks on the topic, but w/e,
gavin's more than welcome to persevere in his usg-is-the-world delusions.
mircea_popescu: at best
gavin will manage to crush the
gavin-bitcoin to whatever it was in 2012 and that's that.
mircea_popescu: no, just, mircea's bitcoin in its
gavin aspect is being sold. so miners of
gavin chain will have to compete with that.
mircea_popescu: and, of course, much like in the case of the "ethereum short" nobody actually bought, here is me looking for counterparties willing to buy
gavin-bitcoins on the understanding that the transaction will only be valid on the
gavin fork, but not in actual bitcoin.
mircea_popescu: now if mod6 an' ben_vulpes + whoever else can contribute get snappy with the actual foudnation work, the beheading of
gavin's pretense will come exactly in time for a smooth transition to a muchly superior alternative.
mircea_popescu: but anyway,
gavin hasn't been making any sense for a long time now.
TomServo: What would
Gavin be referring to when he says "the reference implementation"?
mircea_popescu: thestringpuller: it's funny how
Gavin is all "I want bitcoin to compete with Visa/Mastercard", when anyone in Payment Processing knows those systems are seriously nigga rigged as is. << nobody expects
gavin to say something sensible anymore than they'd expect ronald mcdonald to.
thestringpuller: it's funny how
Gavin is all "I want bitcoin to compete with Visa/Mastercard", when anyone in Payment Processing knows those systems are seriously nigga rigged as is.
Luke-Jr: heck, even
Gavin says it's 2 years out
thestringpuller: Perhaps this can be said of
Gavin, hence tell tale signs of his comromisation.
BingoBoingo: <davout> punkman: "bitcoin.hiv should point to
gavin-foundation" <<< top kek << Point to different scamsite every week.
davout: punkman: "bitcoin.hiv should point to
gavin-foundation" <<< top kek
punkman: bitcoin.hiv should point to
gavin-foundation
mircea_popescu:
Gavin Andresen, "chief scientist", received $209k of "reportable compensation" + $2,884 of "other compensation", for more than $212k. Apparently the foundation thinks it's better to pay one guy $212k for writing blog posts and giving talks and interviews than paying three guys $70k each to work on the software the whole pyramid scheme currency depends on.
mircea_popescu: this idea that "we'll
gavin all over the blockchain technology and everyone will follow" is out of a holywood movie. not how reality works.
mod6: ah. ok. rithm, you do realize that
gavin & the power-rangers derpation thingy is different than ours tho right?
mats_cd03: watch out for
gavin in the second iteration
mircea_popescu: mats_cd03: what is the origin of this 'power rangers' nick? << hours after the fork
gavin & hearn brought upon the network through their alleged ineptitude (which allegation i don't credit, it was deliberate)
mircea_popescu: anyway, let the record reflect that yes, there was a point in 2011 when
gavin was sane.
mircea_popescu: "What would government involvement in Bitcoin look like? Well one of their first goals would be to let the project stagnate. The disappearance of the founder "Satoshi" and appointment of
Gavin Andresen, someone who has publicly admitted he doesn't want much to change in Bitcoin allows us to see one big reason for stagnation." << from the solidcoin derpage.
decimation: re:
gavin's 40 hr week << I was merely pointing out that if ascii's formula is (freedom hrs)/(work hrs), then
gavin might have a good score
mircea_popescu: decimation: asciilifeform: do you think
gavin works 40 hours per week on the git repo? << do you suppose captive whore in thai illegal brothel works 40 hours per week ?
decimation: asciilifeform: do you think
gavin works 40 hours per week on the git repo?
decimation: if
gavin is a pauper than I'm in the poor house
BingoBoingo: At that income level
Gavin's basically in the trap doctors find themsevles when they realize they hate draining abcesses, but their only other prospect is long haul trucking.
mircea_popescu: if there ever was proof positive that crime doesn't pay,
gavin's income is it.
mircea_popescu: "
Gavin Andresen's salary as the full time lead developer of the entire bitcoin protocol is $209k a year."
BingoBoingo: Yeah. Honestly at this point I just don't see many "Bitcoin Developers" actually being very attached to Bitcoin. The "
Gavin wants to quit, but doesn't want to say so" hypothesis.
mircea_popescu: | 34 |
Gavin Andresen | 0 | << not in forum trust list ; | 33 | OgNasty | 1 | << in forum default trust list.
mircea_popescu: like,
gavin et all, should pay a daily fee to be allowed into the amusement park where they pretend like they matter
ben_vulpes: joecool: "reindexing" is something that
gavin's fork does to find all of the transactions relevant to addresses in your wallet in a given blockchain.
joecool: asciilifeform: i see, what exactly has been happening? were people expecting
gavin to crap out a reference eventually or just keep adding BIP's and pile on the crap?