600+ entries in 0.041s
lobbes wonders if it is worth it in next
patch to have bot.py simply parse the MANIFEST.txt for version number emitting
snsabot: Logged on 2019-10-02 03:13:54 diana_coman: bvt: ah, I had this niggling thought that there *was* some
patch I missed somehow; asciilifeform what was it with this/why didn't it make it into the sept vpatch?
mp_en_viaje: bvt, regrind it on the current head plox, and before someone comes up with another
patch so you get the first signature on your own thing plox
diana_coman: bvt: ah, I had this niggling thought that there *was* some
patch I missed somehow; asciilifeform what was it with this/why didn't it make it into the sept vpatch?
lobbes: bot hell today! /me goes off to apply latest stan-logotron
patch lobbes: ugh now I need to update by ericbot to asciilifeform's new
patch. Above echo from #pizarro ^^^
snsabot: Logged on 2019-09-28 14:13:23 asciilifeform: 'tape' knob i realized is unusable shortly after cut
patch, it needs to be rewritten so as to give 'last N' , rather than using start/end index from the earlier raw-log knob
snsabot: Logged on 2019-09-15 14:41:04 lobbes: Now, are you cool with me releasing patches in pieces? I.e. First
patch will be a bot that eats IRC and shits lines into a article on Trilema (under 'logs' category). Then subsequent patches for the rest of the asks.
lobbes: Now, are you cool with me releasing patches in pieces? I.e. First
patch will be a bot that eats IRC and shits lines into a article on Trilema (under 'logs' category). Then subsequent patches for the rest of the asks.
snsabot: Logged on 2019-09-14 03:50:52 mircea_popescu: unrelatedly : hey trinque, now that there's actually multiple functional castles the time's prolly come to update the deedbot voice model into awareness of this situation. so how about a
patch making voice in #trilema dependent on ~my~ wot, rather than deedbot's own ; and similarily in any castles that ask for it / you come to an understanding with the lords thereof, so they can use the voice model there if the
snsabot: Logged on 2019-09-14 07:33:53 ave1:
Patch file weighs 387M
snsabot: Logged on 2019-09-14 03:50:52 mircea_popescu: unrelatedly : hey trinque, now that there's actually multiple functional castles the time's prolly come to update the deedbot voice model into awareness of this situation. so how about a
patch making voice in #trilema dependent on ~my~ wot, rather than deedbot's own ; and similarily in any castles that ask for it / you come to an understanding with the lords thereof, so they can use the voice model there if the
ave1:
Patch file weighs 387M
ossabot: Logged on 2019-09-14 04:06:31 mircea_popescu: unrelatedly : hey trinque, now that there's actually multiple functional castles the time's prolly come to update the deedbot voice model into awareness of this situation. so how about a
patch making voice in #trilema dependent on ~my~ wot, rather than deedbot's own ; and similarily in any castles that ask for it / you come to an understanding with the lords thereof, so they can use the voice model there if the
mircea_popescu: unrelatedly : hey trinque, now that there's actually multiple functional castles the time's prolly come to update the deedbot voice model into awareness of this situation. so how about a
patch making voice in #trilema dependent on ~my~ wot, rather than deedbot's own ; and similarily in any castles that ask for it / you come to an understanding with the lords thereof, so they can use the voice model there if they wanna.
snsabot: Logged on 2019-09-12 15:13:13 asciilifeform: ACHTUNG, panzers! lobbes , diana_coman , et al : reader.py on dulap updated to lobbes's raw-export-fix.
vtree page updated w/ lobbes
patch and lobbes , asciilifeform , sigs.
snsabot: Logged on 2019-09-12 12:20:41 dorion: asciilifeform no Sir. hence my question: is it better to
patch boost for arm64 support or build arm 32 bit bitcoind to run on rockchip ?
dorion: asciilifeform no Sir. hence my question: is it better to
patch boost for arm64 support or build arm 32 bit bitcoind to run on rockchip ?
lobbes: well, I was wrong; still small
patch, but ended up being > one char. Good thing I retested and reread
lobbes: wow, this might end up being the smallest
patch ever. forget one line, this is one character in one line! fix tested and worx.
patch incoming..
lobbes: ok, well confirmed that both the znc2tmsr and irssi2tmsr converters output to spec re: action lines. Looks like it is just the raw log knob. I will dig into it, fix, and
patch snsabot: Logged on 2019-09-11 03:46:17 dorion: It appears to me the options are a) make a
patch to boost to backport the aarch64 support , b) build the arm 32bit toolchain and 32bit bitcoind on rockchip and attempt to run there.
ossabot: Logged on 2019-09-09 23:53:06 lobbes: I'm willing to
patch one or the other (should be a quick fix). Now... the question is which one? The converter, the raw-dumper, or should the eat_dump.py be able to handle BOTH formats?
dorion: It appears to me the options are a) make a
patch to boost to backport the aarch64 support , b) build the arm 32bit toolchain and 32bit bitcoind on rockchip and attempt to run there.
ossabot: Logged on 2019-09-09 23:53:06 lobbes: I'm willing to
patch one or the other (should be a quick fix). Now... the question is which one? The converter, the raw-dumper, or should the eat_dump.py be able to handle BOTH formats?
snsabot: Logged on 2019-09-09 23:37:30 lobbes: I'm willing to
patch one or the other (should be a quick fix). Now... the question is which one? The converter, the raw-dumper, or should the eat_dump.py be able to handle BOTH formats?
snsabot: Logged on 2019-09-09 23:37:30 lobbes: I'm willing to
patch one or the other (should be a quick fix). Now... the question is which one? The converter, the raw-dumper, or should the eat_dump.py be able to handle BOTH formats?
ossabot: Logged on 2019-09-09 23:53:06 lobbes: I'm willing to
patch one or the other (should be a quick fix). Now... the question is which one? The converter, the raw-dumper, or should the eat_dump.py be able to handle BOTH formats?
lobbes: I'm willing to
patch one or the other (should be a quick fix). Now... the question is which one? The converter, the raw-dumper, or should the eat_dump.py be able to handle BOTH formats?
mircea_popescu:
patch it so it releases the file descriptor and reconnects properly.
lobbes: as for the vpatching, I wonder if it makes sense to just "lump them all in" with the quoted search
patch?
lobbes: may make that a
patch in logotron... eventually!
lobbes: hmm that was for the "reader.py" though right? My
patch contained fix for the "eat_dump.py"
lobbes: asciilifeform: did it? I patched it to sit on top of the "line_wraps"
patch snsabot: Logged on 2019-08-22 21:29:11 trinque: or alternatively, where's my
patch spyked ?
snsabot: Logged on 2019-08-22 21:29:11 trinque: or alternatively, where's my
patch spyked ?
spyked: diana_coman, yeah, well I suppose that's another reason why the manifest mechanism is useful: if I signed a
patch P at t1, and later I found out that it does something stupid or subtly malicious or whatever; then at t2 I can sign the "inverse" to P and give context to that signature in the manifest (whoever tries to press that has to know why particularly I made some change)
lobbes: hanbot's
patch removed a query to a table that did not exist in my mysql database, so perhaps this was the cause of the lag; time will tell I guess
ave1_away: and then have diffs of
patch files
snsabot: Logged on 2019-08-22 21:29:11 trinque: or alternatively, where's my
patch spyked ?
mircea_popescu: including an answer for trinque, as to, where's his
patch. aite.
snsabot: Logged on 2019-08-22 21:29:11 trinque: or alternatively, where's my
patch spyked ?
snsabot: Logged on 2019-08-22 21:29:11 trinque: or alternatively, where's my
patch spyked ?
trinque: or alternatively, where's my
patch spyked ?
snsabot: Logged on 2019-01-02 11:38:20 asciilifeform: if one absolutely insists on that feature, prolly Right Thing would be to
patch bot so can hang off a znc ( i tried this with own hands, but failed, the existing item is apparently tailored to fleanode-direct connection )
mp_en_viaje: "However, the program becomes more complicated when the two copies of the base document are not identical. In these cases the
patch program must do the best job it can in applying the " << motherfucker monkeys, how the fuck did this rank imbecile manage to make stupidity sound like "a challenge" ?
snsabot: Logged on 2019-08-17 15:43:38 lobbes: asciilifeform: could you point me to some threads/reading re: this 'fuzzy-merge' concept? V is the only version-control
patch system I've ever used, so I'm having trouble comparing it to the 'anti-models' (I've never used shithub, for e.g.).
lobbes: asciilifeform: could you point me to some threads/reading re: this 'fuzzy-merge' concept? V is the only version-control
patch system I've ever used, so I'm having trouble comparing it to the 'anti-models' (I've never used shithub, for e.g.).
snsabot: Logged on 2019-08-17 14:51:34 asciilifeform: diana_alt: fella seems to have profound talent for reading text w/out ~actually~ reading. (for instance, escaped noticing that primary diff. b/w a vpatch and a heathen
patch, isn't that it is pgp signed (heathens had pgp-signed patches 20y ago) but that it doesn't fuzzy-merge.
mp_en_viaje: to be sure i think your
patch is fine as it is.