1300+ entries in 0.138s
lobbes: I tried to press on the first pass with asciilifeform_aggressive_pushgetblocks.vpatch, and it -seemed- to work. I essentially followed the
trb how-to ONLINE build, but then downloaded the aggressive patch and seal from btcbase/patches
mod6: alright. looks to me like it got all the way through the deps builds, but for some reason puked when trying to build
trb itself.
lobbes: i.e. not yet figured out
trb, because I've been working on mp-wp migration
mod6: lobbes: did you ever figure out your
trb issue that you ran into?
lobbes ended up getting a cheap dedi out in kansas or w/e for 25 bezzlebux. Soley for
trb-ing. Drawback is it has hdd, but going to try and use the aggressive pushgetblocks patch. Seems like diana_coman had nice results with similar experimentation
lobbes: Phew. Now I can focus on getting
trb node up this weekend (hit some barfs last night when building, will post details tonight). Also, logbot-based tickerbot is getting closer (tm) to existing >>
http://btcbase.org/log/2018-05-04#1809600 ☝︎ trinque: all I'm looking for from douchebag currently is a review of what ends up in the
trb binary as a dep
trinque: but yes, point of me asking him for this was to get him to press a
trb and investigate
trinque: douchebag: if you had actually pressed
trb this question would've been answered
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform, afaik there isn't anywhere a complete list of specified versioning for
trb, nor ever was.
ben_vulpes: isn't he still on the hook for a
trb dependency report?
mod6: I guess I need to noodle on this a while, and perhaps make a different example outside the context of
trb.
mod6: Simply because I didn't know that it was output to 'out/
trb', and then I moved the dir to '
trb'. lol. So i tried to run the thing against a dir, not a crystal. Once I realized that, worked fine.
mod6: Next thing was that I got into some very small trouble with: ./txt2dir.py
trb makefiles
mircea_popescu: mod6, was a while ago. but anyway, nevermind, you'll do all this later. get tx tooling into
trb, by all means.
mod6: fwiw, I did look for other appearences of the same bug in all of the
trb source files, however, I didn't see one. Doesn't mean that they don't exist. I invite all to examine the source.
mod6: <+mircea_popescu> hey mod6 how's your ada v coming along ? << Still stuck in the drawer. I haevn't even touched it since Q3 of 17. I'm distinctly intersted in rawtx tools getting into
trb, currently.
a111: Logged on 2018-05-01 14:50 mod6: Did nasty things when I tried this with
TRB.
a111: Logged on 2018-05-01 14:50 mod6: Did nasty things when I tried this with
TRB.
mod6: (re: crystals) re-reading the email, it is jogging my memory that I didn't use the included
trb files specifically. I recall screwing around and wiring in my vtron, as opposed to your vtron, then who knows. I probably did something dumb.
mod6: I'd have to go back an look, but I seem to recall trying to use it to create the
trb patches, then inflate from those. and when I did, lotsa hunks/fuzz etc.
mod6: Did nasty things when I tried this with
TRB.
☟︎☟︎ mod6: <+trinque> mod6: I've got a sendrawtxn patch sitting over here << actually, i should mention that i /did/ create a
trb sendrawtransaction (just this one rpc call) vpatch late last year, but never sent -- really wanted the rest of the gang 'create', 'sign', etc.
trinque: I don't expect to make that one mainline "
trb" though, unless somewhere down the line somebody also breaks off script.cpp into a tx compiler, breaks off a signer, etc
trinque: (got the walletless patch too;
trb node on pizarro is walletless)
trinque: got one that rips out the noui.h idiocy too, and a few others that need finishing before I fork a walletless
trb a111: Logged on 2018-04-21 16:22 avgjoe: someone (not my server, but some other
trb instance) is going to get from who these blocks?
avgjoe: someone (not my server, but some other
trb instance) is going to get from who these blocks?
☟︎ avgjoe: ok, i just wanted to report my experience installing
TRB. On debian stretch after installing all the dependencies listed on
http://thebitcoin.foundation/trb-howto.html , i've modified on /etc/apt/sources.list the repo to the jessie one, then installed gcc and g++ 4.9, then reversed back to stretch
trinque: have you built your own
trb node? used V? understood it? do you have a working gnat? built asciilifeform's ffa? built diana_coman's eucrypt? stood up a gentoo from scratch? fertile ground all over.
ascii_lander: ben_vulpes: absolutely unusable for
trb, cannot (as presently configed) hold the bloxx
ben_vulpes: i will point out that this rockchip will be a poor production
trb host; but will be a fine
trb experimentation platform for trinque's audit
a111: Logged on 2018-04-03 18:23 mircea_popescu: douchebag i'll get you a sever once the pizarro folk unwrap their heads enough to actually have one on offer. so you can tinker on gentoo,
trb etc and get out of the "vps" bs hell.
ascii_lander: there is not , in traditional
trb, a 'talk to these N nodes' mode.
ascii_lander: current
trb (not speaking of my 'wires' attempt) doesn't give you this behaviour
mircea_popescu: think about it, if 500 nodes want to talk to bbistan, each local
trb will talk to 500/n
ascii_lander: lobbes: iirc current
trb won't even ever simult-connect to 2+ nodes nearby in ip space
lobbes: my aim is to have > 1
trb node in > 1 physical locations
ascii_lander: but 1) rockchip will prolly never be an idea
trb box 2) wakeup folx installing 77th
trb in the rack !
trb dun do much good with N nodez hanging off 1 fiber.
a111: Logged on 2018-04-17 01:12 lobbes: I'm probably too poor, but if it is in my range I'll most likely try and grab one for
trb-ing
deedbot: mod6 updated rating of pete_dushenski from 2 to 1 << Runs two
TRB nodes. Has bitcoin related blog.
lobbes: my current
trb box I'm planning to run at home is a mystery box someone gave me; troubleshooting all the hardware issues I keep uncovering are delaying things. Would be nice to have two eventually anyhow
lobbes: I'm probably too poor, but if it is in my range I'll most likely try and grab one for
trb-ing
☟︎ nodehelp: is there a distro where
trb generally 100% works on the first time?
mircea_popescu: consider also that especioally b is problematic as
trb isn';t ~really~ intended to be used in a home environment ; and racked servers may not provide your video whatever.
mircea_popescu: afaik
trb comes cli only ; you can add a gui but a) you'd have to write it and b) it'd necessarily introduce dependencies.
nodehelp: can i also ask: if i want to use
trb i can only do it by commandline via bitcoind or there is a way to add a gui?
nodehelp: i'm not very expert, just trying to follow the script to install
trb mod6: In other tales from the
TRB: I spent a solid chunk of time this weekend trying to backport all of the rpc rawtx functions from upstream prb. Just to see if it was workable, and an educational endevour. This is not going to be a thing. They change tons of baseclasses and introduce a variety of new ones. Going forward, I think these will just be reimplmented in a
trb-fashion.
a111: Logged on 2018-04-10 15:44 david_francois: david_francois: yeah, i got a new server with a SSD raid, I'm planning on getting a update
TRB node there, which should be more reliable
a111: Logged on 2018-04-10 15:35 BingoBoingo: david_francois: I noticed on of your
trb nodes is perenially 100,000 blocks behind. Consider building a new bitcoind with either the asciilifeform or ben_vulpes aggression patches. Vastly improved sync behavior.
mircea_popescu: now, kako for all his weird was certainly technically competent, so it's not the case that "there lay a
trb in the rain".
trinque: yeah, but I'm not extending people
trb+linux+amd64 insurance
trinque: douchebag: asking you to review
trb's deps wasn't idly selected
BingoBoingo: Generally since aggression nodes began the
trb ecosystem has been much more sync'd from my perch.
a111: Logged on 2017-08-04 22:56 asciilifeform: and this is true of pretty much any box that makes decent
trb node (i.e. has sata3 + ssd )
a111: Logged on 2018-04-12 18:00 asciilifeform: it resembles 'nano ecc' which at 1 point asciilifeform tried to port to
trb trinque left an experimental walletless
trb running on that box
mircea_popescu: running
trb offers a firm guarantee that you will have your coins perpetually. running the various usg-sponsored "i can't believe it's not bitcoin" margerine offers a firm guarantee that a) any time you spend with them will be wasted on a long enough timeline and b) any resources you spend with them will be worthless on a long enough timeline. so bear that in mind.
avgjoe: i suppose that is a noob question, but if someone send me btc from a bech32 address to my
trb legacy address, does the node ignore the tx?
avgjoe: interested in running
trb lobbes: ssd, for example, is pretty much necessary for
trb nodes to not fall behind.
douchebag: trinque: I'm going to get a
trb node setup when I get that server
trinque: also wasn't there a report on
trb dependencies coming?
david_francois: david_francois: yeah, i got a new server with a SSD raid, I'm planning on getting a update
TRB node there, which should be more reliable
☟︎ BingoBoingo: david_francois: I noticed on of your
trb nodes is perenially 100,000 blocks behind. Consider building a new bitcoind with either the asciilifeform or ben_vulpes aggression patches. Vastly improved sync behavior.
☟︎ a111: Logged on 2018-04-05 16:36 asciilifeform: trinque: theoretically 'every private has a marshal's baton in his knapsack', but realistically it is not esp. likely that 'popping
trb' had to wait for this 1 d00d to turn 19 or what he was.
a111: Logged on 2018-04-05 16:31 trinque wonders if douchebag realizes what useful work it'd be, to know how easily
trb nodes can be popped, given that the wallet will of course have to be sitting right there, with same permissions, on same box, and etc
trinque: ftr if the report is "
trb's deps are not susceptible to any known RCE" that'd be a fine thing to see written up too
trinque: (and obviously, ~I do not use the
trb wallet~)
trinque wonders if douchebag realizes what useful work it'd be, to know how easily
trb nodes can be popped, given that the wallet will of course have to be sitting right there, with same permissions, on same box, and etc
☟︎ spyked: mircea_popescu: yeh I'm definitely considering that! the reason I've postponed getting an ARM board at all was the lack of a full-fledged SATA 3 port. I wanna get
trb running on arm at some point among others.
mircea_popescu: the republic's de facto moving towards hardware specialization, there's on one hand the very heavy cpu machines (of which sha miners are a subset, phuctor is another, and so on), and then the sort of thing like this, typified by a
trb node machine.
mircea_popescu: douchebag alf lands in the oriental republic sometime mid month ; you'll get your login then, an' your first task will be to get
trb up on it ; and the tasks 2 throught 999 will be to have fun.