76 entries in 0.657s
a111: Logged on 2016-08-02 16:13 mircea_popescu: phf allow me to quote to you from modern
tolkien : "The heir apparent, Crown Prince Maha Vajiralongkorn, is poorly regarded in Thailand and the succession has clouded the brows of not only the Thai political elite, but the Thai people, who believe a period of substantial instability will follow the King's death"
mircea_popescu: "battlestar galactica" is actually more accomplished, and this coming from a man who actually despises
tolkien, let alone rando pulper.
erlehmann: Framedragger i actually meant “i had not noticed to that extent until now how
tolkien tells a story that can be seen as a race war”
mircea_popescu: to be noted that l'encyclopedie (the 1700s item) was a LITERARY WORK. with d'alembert almost a sort of
tolkien of his time. it mattered not so much whether the items contained were right or wrong (obviously most were wrong, 1700s) but the fact that you could rely on every respectable gent knowing at least of them.
mircea_popescu: the fact that the republic creates the tools it uses, entirely and exactly, with no quarter given to this otherwise universal "i found it, i'm calling it a tool and allowing it to shape me in the process" idiocy simply is not conceivable naturally, to the poor souls captive in some sort of children's
tolkien fairytale.
mircea_popescu: consumerist culture, meaning that unless i fuck
tolkien's corpse into action, i'm sol.
Framedragger: ..yeah i'm not going for sindarin or w/e language(s)
tolkien invented. could be fun, but.. eh
mircea_popescu: and note that naming the
tolkien for
tolkien isn't blaming him for the gulag. merely recognising his intricacy in the civilisation-masquerading-as-a-culture that spawned him.
mircea_popescu: there's a quanta of energy, a token of friendship and a
tolkien of usg.aspie h&d.
phf: diana_coman: perfectly fit for proper and good life as defined by
tolkien, somehow magically fit for all the necessary tasks of the quest. even fighting, like pippin and merry after they are split from fellowship. they are literally only unfit for things that are bad, and even there frodo eventually at the last moment gets corrupted, Let That Be A Warning To You All
diana_coman: <mircea_popescu> really, byzantine fiction (currently known as the vulgate) is much better. but i don't think much more of the people who regard the bible as "great writing" than of the
tolkien fans. <- fans, lol; out of curiosity: an example as to "much better"?
mircea_popescu: really, byzantine fiction (currently known as the vulgate) is much better. but i don't think much more of the people who regard the bible as "great writing" than of the
tolkien fans.
diana_coman: as to length that indeed I can agree it is a big fault of
tolkien - at times he rambles because apparently he's just too much in love with the landscape basically
hanbot: scandalous how much bad literature there is by this
tolkien token then!
mircea_popescu: the thing flew "look, this thing almost like in carroll is in
tolkien" "yes but here's deluged in crap" "oh, well this guy deluges things in crap" "that he does or that he doesn't has no bearing on crap and deluging."
mircea_popescu: we're talking of
tolkien and hgis masteries. that he THINKS it's ok to disregard the brevity rule does not make it go away.
mircea_popescu: hanbot why would you place ~it in the actual work~ when it's a response to a meta-discussion you started with " i don't think
tolkien had much mastery of economy of words" ?
a111: Logged on 2016-08-02 17:20 diana_coman: I'll add only the message that considered to be "what
Tolkien had to say" (even though he did it through "not-real-life universe") namely that all and everyone (yeah, the ordinary and no, they are not made anything by gandalf quite pointedly not made anything by him) is in some way responsible /called to do something when shit hits the fan; that is all I guess
hanbot: sure. and no, i don't think
tolkien had much mastery of economy of words (somehow this'd seem to make him less a copywriter? or maybe merely a more monstrous one).
phf: so is it purely when i became a man, i put the ways of childhood behind me, or you're saying there's something specific to
tolkien that turns his fans into castrati?
diana_coman: I'll add only the message that considered to be "what
Tolkien had to say" (even though he did it through "not-real-life universe") namely that all and everyone (yeah, the ordinary and no, they are not made anything by gandalf quite pointedly not made anything by him) is in some way responsible /called to do something when shit hits the fan; that is all I guess
☟︎ diana_coman: hm; so far we established we agree (and apparently this wasn't in fact disputed although it seemed so) that
tolkien's writing is not reflecting "real life" nor intended to really; this makes it crud in your view I gather
mircea_popescu: nevertheless,
tolkien is therefore part of english CIVILISATION. he is an artefact. he is pointedly NOT part of culture.
diana_coman:
Tolkien made his universe as a place to experiment with his language; I can fully see and agree with the point that it is "not real life" - I read him very late and therefore I knew this already, I never for a second considered it as "real life" or reflection of it or whatever; I guess that's where the whole thing comes from
mircea_popescu: what ever happened to make
tolkien more acceptable than sadoveanu ?
diana_coman: mircea_popescu> this activity, not just "
tolkien" but generally "reading", is very much subverted in the anglotard world. have yo useen this, whole carloads of white, quiet, mousy people "reading a book" on their commute <- actually I saw this in FRANCE
phf: i don't think even
tolkien fans think of
tolkien as a writer, that's why him and his brood get own section at a bookstore
mircea_popescu: this activity, not just "
tolkien" but generally "reading", is very much subverted in the anglotard world. have yo useen this, whole carloads of white, quiet, mousy people "reading a book" on their commute.
diana_coman: well, fwiw
tolkien as far as I know did NOT consider himself a writer
mircea_popescu: otherwise, the notion that
tolkien is a writer is not unlike the notion that roger alexander of the us civil war reenactment society is A CIVIL WAR HERO.
diana_coman: mircea_popescu, "there's no errect penis in
tolkien's book" - is this a correct description of the main fault you find?
diana_coman: keep aspies away from
tolkien you say? so keep them, whatevs
diana_coman: other than that I don't see any link to either immersive universes or Gandalf or
Tolkien or whatever else
BingoBoingo: Sauron seems like
Tolkien wrote him pretty special.
diana_coman: uhm, what worlds where people are special BingoBoingo ? as far as I know
Tolkien's point was quite the opposite of this really
BingoBoingo: <mircea_popescu> nothing wrong with this, EXCEPT it comes with instructions, and the instructions include "how to castrate yourself with your new lego set" << This does seem like
Tolkien/Lewis/Rowling et al. Pretty much made to turn people into apies with "worlds where people are special but fucking doesn't exist"
mircea_popescu: phf allow me to quote to you from modern
tolkien : "The heir apparent, Crown Prince Maha Vajiralongkorn, is poorly regarded in Thailand and the succession has clouded the brows of not only the Thai political elite, but the Thai people, who believe a period of substantial instability will follow the King's death"
☟︎ phf: well,
tolkien ~is~ a construction set, but that's its whole point, it's just a very elaborate construction set.
diana_coman: so basically that's what you are asking for: translate
tolkien for me so that I can see what is worth in there for in the current language I can't see it
mircea_popescu: ~obviously~ you could translate, if that were the matter, "oh they brought him
tolkien in islandic and he doesn't read that"
phf:
tolkien is not literature though, it's more like an oxford style set of artifacts (epics, linguistic analysis, chronicles, etc.). the interesting part of
tolkien is that he invented a universe and described it through same set of tools he would describe historical past. the sex part is on point, because stodgy british professor, he views his imaginary world through same dodgy prism he views historical past.
diana_coman: asciilifeform was faster than me on
tolkien; it sounds to me that mircea_popescu's objection to
Tolkien is that he did not tackle the right problem(s)
diana_coman: don't know where he is on that, but harry potter is a shit from what I saw and no way to compare it to
tolkien diana_coman: I'm with asciilifeform on this one re
Tolkien mircea_popescu: yes, this includes
tolkien. no, i don't see him as much more than an earlier, therefore craftier, woman what's her name.
mircea_popescu: (in fairness to be distinguished from bayes' own work, about in the sense re
tolkien above)
mircea_popescu: but yes, pretty much everyone with serious cultural immersion in anglosphere said the same re
tolkien. what can i say, i'll take yer word for it.
punkman: are they doing more
tolkien movies?
mircea_popescu: whole
tolkien/rawling/etc 2000s bullshit runs together in my mind with star wards and iron pants or w/e the 2010s "superhero" films are.
assbot: Logged on 10-02-2015 16:46:25; thestringpuller: ;;google 2nd breakfast
tolkien BingoBoingo: ben_vulpes: fwiw there aren't many orcs in the rural bits of ussa, and one can shoot trespassers on sign in those provinces too << Different kind, even
tolkien had different kinds of orcs
jurov: lol BingoBoingo... add
tolkien - silmarillion to your queries