48 entries in 0.586s
ben_vulpes: the whole
responsible disclosure threads went clear over your head
douchebag: Aside from that, I don't really see what's bad about a
responsible disclosure policy. I don't believe that asking people to not fuck your shit up in exchange for payment is too much to ask
a111: Logged on 2018-05-14 13:30 asciilifeform: ^ pretty lulzy prehistory -- usg is burning the vuln in the most traditional way, complete with '
responsible disclosure'ism and a boeck-style 'researcher' ; nao spinning in every propaganda organ in unison as 'pgp broken!'
BingoBoingo: <asciilifeform> ^ pretty lulzy prehistory -- usg is burning the vuln in the most traditional way, complete with '
responsible disclosure'ism and a boeck-style 'researcher' ; nao spinning in every propaganda organ in unison as 'pgp broken!' << Apparently @hanno has a take on this too that sums to the rest of the party line "who could be using this with hygeine?"
mimisbrunnr: Logged on 2018-03-22 19:33 ben_vulpes: oh and twist, douchebag skip the
responsible disclosure fingertrap and fuck 'em hard.
BingoBoingo: What is a Qntra submission if not the most
responsible possible
disclosure ben_vulpes: oh and twist, douchebag skip the
responsible disclosure fingertrap and fuck 'em hard.
shinohai snickers a bit @ '
responsible disclosure'
mod6: <+ben_vulpes> the
responsible disclosure whining is pretty lolarious << very.
ben_vulpes: the
responsible disclosure whining is pretty lolarious
ben_vulpes: asciilifeform: look when there's actual even halfway sorta (((cryptocurrency))) involved, no
responsible disclosure will ever happen
a111: Logged on 2015-12-20 17:54 asciilifeform: didn't we do a '
responsible disclosure'-is-for-idiots thread ?
a111: Logged on 2017-07-27 13:39 asciilifeform: '
responsible disclosure' shitsackery.
mircea_popescu: 18* adlai wonders whether the low price tag of
responsible disclosure stems from the glass cannon nature << doesn't seem glass cannon-y at all, with any patience you could have hijacked some "notable" accounts made them do some funky shit.
assbot: Logged on 09-03-2016 19:25:33; *: adlai wonders whether the low price tag of
responsible disclosure stems from the glass cannon nature of indiscretionary usage
adlai wonders whether the low price tag of
responsible disclosure stems from the glass cannon nature of indiscretionary usage
☟︎ assbot: Logged on 06-07-2015 01:24:01; mircea_popescu: "you wanted to benefit from
responsible disclosure protections, you should have been in the wot" "but at the time i made that decision it seemed a no brainer, why expend the effort" "right. this is why you die."
mats: this is not
responsible disclosure at any stretch
assbot: Logged on 06-07-2015 01:24:01; mircea_popescu: "you wanted to benefit from
responsible disclosure protections, you should have been in the wot" "but at the time i made that decision it seemed a no brainer, why expend the effort" "right. this is why you die."
mircea_popescu: "you wanted to benefit from
responsible disclosure protections, you should have been in the wot" "but at the time i made that decision it seemed a no brainer, why expend the effort" "right. this is why you die."
☟︎☟︎ ben_vulpes: anyways i tried to do the
responsible disclosure thing
BingoBoingo: robwhiz22: If you thing your solicitation reveals flaws, public
disclosure is the
responsible thing to do
mircea_popescu: and moreover... the product is not deployed. any
disclosure is
responsible by definition
mike_c: how can you say it would not be
responsible disclosure when that is exactly what the manufacturer is asking you to do.
robwhiz22: It would not be
responsible disclosure if I were to pastebin the rest of hte email here.
weex: chsados: i support
responsible disclosure