log☇︎
2600+ entries in 0.286s
mod6: and seems to work ok... but i'll hvae to test this quite a bit.
mod6: i use the built thing to test my code changes and other config changes.
mod6: trinque shinohai ben_vulpes polarbeard & anyone else who wants to test the new V & buildscript [v99996]: http://dpaste.com/2WQCDKX.txt
mod6: <+mircea_popescu> mod6 alrighty, seems it's teh consensus here. << ok lemme put this together, and will post in here for you guys to review, and people to test.
mircea_popescu: put the test sufficiently high up in the program flow you won't have bad things happen.
mod6: All: Stand-by I've made some updates to the script referenced in the wiki as to drop in the latest version of V (with the latest 3 patches in the mirror) - im gonna test it, then post it here. It'd be good to have some of you test it too.
assbot: [BTC-dev] Some test patches and my V implementation ... ( http://bit.ly/1NZjGPg )
mod6: i'll give it a go as soon as I get the soba out and test the PVS.
mod6: i need to test PVS a bit more actually tho.
mod6: which is a good thing that the test picked it up.
mircea_popescu: yes, but it's necessarily a meaningless test seeing how wikipedia itself is not notable.
ascii_butugychag: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=27-01-2016#1387030 << actually the basic shivatron is done, but i'd like to test before posting ☝︎
pete_dushenski: maybe 24hr qc test at factory facility before shipping to permanent data centre.
assbot: A small 2009 car demolishes a 1959 Chevy in a crash test ... ( http://bit.ly/1JzmW3s )
punkman: http://kottke.org/16/01/a-small-2009-car-demolishes-a-1959-chevy-in-a-crash-test
ben_vulpes: i only had the opportunity to test it recently, failed to even build prerequsites and so cannot sign it. i also do not intend to build another openbsd system in the immediate future.
phf: basically the patch being dropped created bunch of work for me, that i don't have bandwidth to pursue. (i.e. produce a v version, test on stator)
phf: fwiw openbsd didn't make it through v-ification either, it was designed to work cross platform, but i believe there were makefile modifications since, that didn't include it. i don't actively run openbsd, so can't integration test the result
ben_vulpes: anyways, interesting thing, polarbeard, perhaps i shall test it some day along side the tools written by people i trust like mod6 and trinque and asciilifeform.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform he included a test suite, and a list of its outputs, which is impressive.
ascii_butugychag: one does not need to be mircea_popescu to test this.
assbot: Logged on 22-01-2016 15:31:49; mircea_popescu: the problem with tests is that you can't test for something not happening.
mircea_popescu: the problem with tests is that you can't test for something not happening. ☟︎
gabriel_laddel: asciilifeform: it should be possible to test them before purchase, right?
mod6: i conducted a second live-fire test today with the changes submitted by mircea_popescu & asciilifeform, here are the results: http://dpaste.com/29928TB.txt
mircea_popescu: 5) Function Macros And Recursion <<< "What ended up being the bug in my preprocessor for this test case was in evaluating the argument prescanned tokens that were passed to a function macro invocation. If the function macro being invoked contained a token with the same identifier as the function macro being invoked, but didn't actually call that function macro, it would incorrectly disable this token. This bug combine
mod6: <+mircea_popescu> well, i do think to some degree your patch should be restated, but not in the sense of replacing it altogether << yeah, ok. i'll do some work here today / tonight, do a re-test and the hopefully get it to the ML before the week is out.
mod6: <+mircea_popescu> asciilifeform http://dpaste.com/26VKRQG << re: There is no reason to test for both highS and lowS being set, because this is tested in init.cpp already, ... << For some reason I had it in my head that since this gets set in util.h/.cpp that both may become set at some point post execution if someone does something funny.
BingoBoingo: There really ought to be a moral test to get a scooty puff.
BingoBoingo: It's not like your bones are failing because you decided to test the limits of normal anatomy by butter huffing your way to 500+ pounds
mod6: this test tx was processed by the original code.
mod6: ok changes made. gonna recompile send some test txn, then if all *seems* well, will share my vpatch
mod6: <+hanbot> eh, can't complain. got a sunburn, acquired another deskbox...speaking of which i'ma want to test trinque's makefile bonanza soon, may be firing derpquestions. << cool! i need some sunshine myself.
hanbot: eh, can't complain. got a sunburn, acquired another deskbox...speaking of which i'ma want to test trinque's makefile bonanza soon, may be firing derpquestions.
ascii_butugychag: mircea_popescu: it's been 80-90% spamola since start of 'stress test' crap
mircea_popescu: you can't even list them, you're gonna test for them too ?
assbot: Logged on 18-01-2016 15:15:10; mod6: Attention TRB Testers: If you want to help test, please take the time to build trb via trinque's makefiles here; http://therealbitcoin.org/ml/btc-dev/2016-January/000190.html (Should be basically getting & verifing the tar ball; plus setting up a ~/.wot dir with keys for V to use) -- then a `make` in the directory. Please report your findings. Thanks.
assbot: Logged on 18-01-2016 15:15:10; mod6: Attention TRB Testers: If you want to help test, please take the time to build trb via trinque's makefiles here; http://therealbitcoin.org/ml/btc-dev/2016-January/000190.html (Should be basically getting & verifing the tar ball; plus setting up a ~/.wot dir with keys for V to use) -- then a `make` in the directory. Please report your findings. Thanks.
mod6: Attention TRB Testers: If you want to help test, please take the time to build trb via trinque's makefiles here; http://therealbitcoin.org/ml/btc-dev/2016-January/000190.html (Should be basically getting & verifing the tar ball; plus setting up a ~/.wot dir with keys for V to use) -- then a `make` in the directory. Please report your findings. Thanks. ☟︎☟︎
BingoBoingo: guruvan: http://therealbitcoin.org/ml/btc-dev/2015-August/000139.html I believe it is in the latest Test 2 bundle
mod6: <+thestringpuller> yea it exited when the connect failed << would someone like to test this & log their results so we can put this one to bed? basically should be able to start up bitcoind, run a `ps ax`, `netstat -an` and an `ifconfig`, then a `./bitcoind stop`, then the `ps ax`, `netstat -an` and `ifconfig` again to see whats happening - perhaps even a tail of the last 100 lines of the debug log...
mircea_popescu: 20 is a middling amount of test number.
copypaste: i use http://thebitcoin.foundation/test-builds/v0.5.4/amd64/bitcoin-v0_5_4-TEST2.tar.gz btw.
BingoBoingo: adlai: Cliff notes are not reading shakespeare, even if the kid passes the classroom test. Even a quality summary is at best merely an aid useful for assisting a thrid or fourth rereading of the actual canon material.
assbot: Spam Test Result by mail-tester.com ... ( http://bit.ly/1SPTkjX )
mircea_popescu: mod6 basically all it needs is a test-and-substract.
assbot: Test de cultura termodinamica on Trilema - A blog by Mircea Popescu. ... ( http://bit.ly/1Kb0zvM )
mircea_popescu: ;;later tell pete_dushenski actually speaking of pankkake, he did resolve http://trilema.com/2014/test-de-cultura-termodinamica/#comment-104245
BingoBoingo: "Prime95, which has historically been used to benchmark and stress-test computers, uses Fast Fourier Transforms to multiply extremely large numbers. A particular exponent size, 14,942,209, has been found to cause the system crashes."
phf: you can't make any statements about chars using eq. eq is a special beast used to test ~von neumann~ identity. and all the comments in the spec are related to that. sometimes (eq 1 1) but (eq 123123 123123) is not
mircea_popescu: "The implementation may choose to search sequence-2 in any order; there is no guarantee on the number of times the test is made."
mircea_popescu: <mircea_popescu> quick test : does http://trilema.com/2015/sa-muare-haterii-mei-doi/#selection-83.0-83.6 blink for anyone but me ? << lemme reiterate
mircea_popescu: quick test : does http://trilema.com/2015/sa-muare-haterii-mei-doi/#selection-83.0-83.6 blink for anyone but me ?
ascii_butugychag: after the successful test of malleus h., i've been tempted to write one
mircea_popescu: i would strongly advise anyone using trb in production to at least test this patch.
shinohai: ty trinque will test asap
mircea_popescu: " we can't test them all. Thanks for your understanding." << what the fuck are we understanding ? that the kids don't belong anywhere near a computer, off to the farm ?
ascii_butugychag: '... We knew this change would break other ports, but given that there are some 100 ports that depend on qt4-mac, we can't test them all. Thanks for your understanding.'
assbot: Logged on 06-01-2016 15:46:58; ascii_butugychag: 'Filippo Valsorda. I'm Italian and I work on the CloudFlare Security Team in London. I built the public Heartbleed test and I mess with cryptography. Public speaker. Motorbike rider. Frequent flyer. Hacker School F'13.'
ascii_butugychag: 'Filippo Valsorda. I'm Italian and I work on the CloudFlare Security Team in London. I built the public Heartbleed test and I mess with cryptography. Public speaker. Motorbike rider. Frequent flyer. Hacker School F'13.' ☟︎
assbot: Logged on 06-01-2016 03:39:38; BingoBoingo: ALSO BEST KOREA CLAIMS HYDROGEN BOMB TEST
BingoBoingo: ALSO BEST KOREA CLAIMS HYDROGEN BOMB TEST ☟︎
asciilifeform: apparently same with 1.4.10 on test box (clean keychain)
asciilifeform: foobar verifies on my test box using kakobrekla's gpg binary and using this pubkey.
asciilifeform: verifies under clean .gpg on test box also
ascii_butugychag: meanwhile... 'Spurious check failures happen for machines without ECC memory. Of our test systems, all machines with Intel CPUs as well as some AMD low-end systems lack ECC. This is a result of that AMD supports ECC generally while Intel only supports ECC for Xeon CPUs relying on more expensive motherboards. But the GMP project is struggling to afford even the cheapest hardware.'
pete_dushenski: mod6: cool thanks. i'll let you know how this test goes :)
BingoBoingo: Quent: They really don't. The test is whether or not node sealed in concrete without admin port needs chiseled out or not
assbot: Coinbase Runs Bitcoin XT in Production as Pilot Test ... ( http://bit.ly/1UfFhSY )
pete_dushenski: http://www.newsbtc.com/2015/12/29/coinbase-runs-bitcoin-xt-in-production-as-pilot-test/
mod6: ok -- so in this scenario (before the introduction of 'test-v054-REL-wLayout.vpatch') the 'test-layout.vpatch' is a disconnected node - its own root/leaf if you like
mod6: here's a look at the 'test-v054-REL-wLayout.vpatch': http://dpaste.com/312TB48.txt
mod6: But I don't need to tag every file in the 'test-layout.vpatch' to tie it in, just one file will suffice.
mod6: the main problem here is going to be tagging the MANIFEST file, like i did in the 'test-v054-REL-wLayout.vpatch' -- because it'll be a clearsigned file. no way to 'tag' a file like that.
mod6: http://www.mod6.net/btcf/test-v054-rel.html
mod6: so here's what we'd look like after we add all of the new makefile+configuration files+directories via the 'test-layout.vpatch' & a 'test-v054-REL-wLayout.vpatch' to tie it all together:
mod6: V with the latest changes { post-press hash checking & use .wot/.seals in pwd } seems to press a new vpatch containing new dirs + files within (where the vpatch has no antecedents) -- this is only a test
asciilifeform: 'Last week, U.S. District Court Judge John W. Lungstrum dismissed every one of the Hartes’s claims. Harte found that sending a SWAT team into a home first thing in the morning based on no more than a positive field test and spotting a suspect at a gardening store was not a violation of the Fourth Amendment. He found that the police had probable cause for the search, and that the way the search was conducted did not constitut
mod6: i'll test a bit as I said and then re-publish a new one when complet.e
mod6: all: btw, if you do use the above test patch for V, please remember you may need to run a dos2unix on the dpaste [dpaste.com/12M99KB.txt]
assbot: [BTC-dev] Some test patches and my V implementation ... ( http://bit.ly/1NZjGPg )
mircea_popescu: "Our first beta test was a disaster when Amazon (who was our payment processor) suspended our account for not complying with money transfer issues. Fans were able to participate in the sale, but we were unable to capture their billing. We ended up paying the artist out of our own pocket and giving everyone his music for free (and we never told him that happened until now)." <<< derps were going to bypass amazon on an a
BingoBoingo: pete_dushenski: As penance you should fire up a trb node to test the new version string patch
mod6: so I think programatically I have it worked out on how to make this happen, was about to test last weekend? lemme dig up the logs on this.
asciilifeform: because you can throw in any patches you like, made for the occasion of the test
asciilifeform: also if you set your vtron to 'wild' mode you can trivially test various combos
asciilifeform: mod6: test it with my latest patch
mod6: anyway, yeah, will still test that.
mod6: <+asciilifeform> mod6: have you tested it with 'false' entries? (files which were newly created) << this is a good test. it should just do what its supposed to do 'as is' I think? this line will grab the 'b' of the vdiff; my $file_hash = $vp_map{$vp}{$src_file_name}{b};
mircea_popescu: s to capture leads (since I had no product, that was just a test to see if there was demand). Then I bought a few dollars in Adwords to drive traffic to it."
asciilifeform: ben_vulpes: do you test on an actual physical ipnohe ?
mod6: <+ascii_field> https://bitnodes.21.co/nodes/?q=/therealbitcoin.org:0.9.99.99 << experimental programmable-versionstring patch is in test, and seen even here << cool!
ascii_field: https://bitnodes.21.co/nodes/?q=/therealbitcoin.org:0.9.99.99 << experimental programmable-versionstring patch is in test, and seen even here
ben_vulpes: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=16-12-2015#1344551 << first there is a faux test to set the bar low ☝︎
nubbins`: i signed up for this broadband speed test thing
TheNewDeal: like a test trip to see if they allow me to pass through the border?
ascii_field sometimes wonders if mircea_popescu does the 'nail in a coffin and float'em down the river as test of faith' thing also
assbot: Logged on 15-12-2015 07:47:56; BingoBoingo: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=15-12-2015#1343231 << Was offline dedicating my pipe to a test. Holy fuckballs does 0.11.2 suck at peer discovery and sig verification speed.
assbot: Logged on 15-12-2015 07:47:56; BingoBoingo: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=15-12-2015#1343231 << Was offline dedicating my pipe to a test. Holy fuckballs does 0.11.2 suck at peer discovery and sig verification speed.
BingoBoingo: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=15-12-2015#1343231 << Was offline dedicating my pipe to a test. Holy fuckballs does 0.11.2 suck at peer discovery and sig verification speed. ☝︎☟︎☟︎