2500+ entries in 0.352s
mod6: jurov:
test worked with just a regular clearsigned message.
phf: l1 or l2 runs trb, where behavior can be improved. better sync mechanisms, bandwidth/cpu conservative network activity, etc. anyone in the wot can also be punished for abuse, i.e. if asciilifeform starts sending me gigs of bogus transactions, and it's not a
test and he can't be reasoned with, etc.
mod6: i'll
test that out tomorrow when i get a sec.
mod6: until we finally get a
test branch and so on and so forth, this stuff has to be ~perfect~ or we've got zip
ben_vulpes: mircea_popescu: only if "actual
test cycles" only means "#b-a
test cycles"
mircea_popescu: ben_vulpes really ? i thought it was pretty fast for an actual
test cycle ?
jurov: mod6 looks like it's fixed, my
test email went through.... check whether your email was queued
mod6: TMSR Testers: Last chance to
test beta4!
pete_dushenski: i'd consider those letters i wrote to peck and lee as 'dry
test runs' but mebbe not enough forced meme!
BingoBoingo: Maybe start some dry
test runs? Force a meme or something?
mod6: i'll give it a few days and then will roll up a full bundle. i've got an automated
test for this case now too.
mod6: ok, so instead what I'll do here is add an automated
test to check for this, so i don't regress later. and then most likely will put out a 3rd beta patch for people to
test/review.
mod6: to
test it, i had to hand-diddle one of the vpatches. easy enough to do. if someone is doing something very strange or bad or whatever on their system it could lead to an infinate loop.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform for the sake of argument, consider this issue : <asciilifeform> but the hamilton thing is garbage. ; hamiltoninc : "Here are some properties and features that make 001 unique: Always number one when put to the
test."
mod6: last chance to
test that beta_2 patch for V if you still want to do so.
shinohai: kk I'll just
test as-is for now
mod6: <+mircea_popescu> hoping that mod6 will save you from inclusion arbitrarily is a lot fucking weaker than just having the proper control of only signing in the
test branch, and choosing where yhou sign << yah, this may be a really good idea. right now, we're livin on the edge.
mircea_popescu: hoping that mod6 will save you from inclusion arbitrarily is a lot fucking weaker than just having the proper control of only signing in the
test branch, and choosing where yhou sign
mircea_popescu: it is increasingly obvious, to me, that there should be a new genesis made, signed by a specially generated identity, "
test".
assbot: Successfully updated the rating for pete_dushenski from 1 to 2 with note: Built TRB node & helps
test. Runs contravex.com a TMSR related blog.
assbot: Successfully updated the rating for thestringpuller from 2 to 3 with note: Helped
test TRB.
mod6: !rate pete_dushenski 2 Built TRB node & helps
test. Runs contravex.com a TMSR related blog.
mod6: !rate thestringpuller 3 Helped
test TRB.
mircea_popescu: having a trb-
test suite is a good move, because even if dissidence is a b-a tradition, nevertheless it allows a common basis to make communication useful.
assbot: GitHub - evolutional/utest: An ultra-lightweight, micro unit
test framework for C99 presented as a single-header ... (
http://bit.ly/1Sgi6eb )
mircea_popescu: "Linux Requirements These are the base requirements to build and use Google
Test from a source package (as described below):
mircea_popescu: In addition to many internal projects at Google, Google
Test is also used by the following notable projects: The Chromium projects (behind the Chrome browser and Chrome OS). The LLVM compiler. Protocol Buffers, Google's data interchange format. The OpenCV computer vision library.
mod6: anyway, boost has its own unit testing abilities, which is what the current
test are built with -- the allure of a mock framework here though, could be helpful.
pete_d_out: mod6 nice work on v99995 ! quite a few changes in there. my v99996
test has had a few bumps in the road (mostly hosting issues afaict) but is still syncing. i'll let you know if there are any snags in that, but holleee you guys are pumping out these trb releases !!
BingoBoingo: PeterL: We do, but it would be bad journalism to disclose such things. And really how often are we actually going to
test emails anyways.
phf: it seems like a cool profiling target, how long it takes to eatblock entire chain across different ssds on some
test hardware
BingoBoingo: The proper approach to sportsball hindbrains is considering them as a sort of Nevada
test site, but for optimizing performance of doorkickers. The trend of these hindbrains whooping the police suggests that the "Black Lives Matter" business is internalizing with the ordinance and the Trinity bomb is going feral.
mircea_popescu: "The Bechdel
test (/ˈbɛkdəl/ BEK-dəl) asks whether a work of fiction features at least two women who talk to each other about something other than a man."
assbot: Logged on 07-02-2016 08:11:39; ben_vulpes: although the scene with the two ancient earth babes was amusing in how solidly it failed the bechdel
test ben_vulpes: although the scene with the two ancient earth babes was amusing in how solidly it failed the bechdel
test ☟︎ mircea_popescu: and to turdcherry the shitcake, all these nobodies on a stick run around spewing wholly delusional notions of expertise and amateurship. just don't ask them to put it to any sort of actual
test.
thestringpuller: ascii_butugychag: re: nuke designer. I remember reading a wired article saying that practical nuclear engineering (bombs) is a dying field since no one can technically
test nuclear detonations. Most of the students who were learning from manhattan project-age engineers were learning via word of mouth.
mod6: but not for at least a week. i need some time to look into that and to let people
test the beta patch. i want to get these resolved so we can move on.
mod6: I'll keep this in mind as a
test case.
mod6: ok, thanks, i've been working on a fix for a similar thing, actually, which is related to a similar
test by ben_vulpes -- but haven't completed it yet.
mod6: In regards to the above email section 0x04: To
test this, one can simply grab polarbeard's vpatch and sig and drop them into place, then try to press the entire tree. This should hault throwing an error since the actual output hash does not match the ~expected~ output hash.
mod6: I'll probably just send the patch to the ML to recruit people to help me
test over the next two weeks.
pete_dushenski: ^a
test. you might see me logging in as 'pete_d_out' in the next week or so. if you do, please to +v!
mod6: meanwhile, I'll work on an automated
test for this change and work on republishing this fix as a one change deal. will be v99995
mod6: im just trying to be sure, im already pretty sure... but i wanted you to look/
test so i dont end up with more on my plate
mod6: right this is actually a really good
test case.
mod6: if anyone else is in the middle of creating a patch - maybe hold off a day or so before you submit until I can straighten out the tree &
test everything.
mircea_popescu: jurov respectfully an' all that, but : didn't we
test dpaste and it came out that it mangled nothing ?
assbot: Logged on 02-02-2016 06:22:46; mod6: give these a compile & quick
test if you don't mind and then upon confirmation, I'll update the mirror.
assbot: Logged on 02-02-2016 06:22:46; mod6: give these a compile & quick
test if you don't mind and then upon confirmation, I'll update the mirror.
mod6: give these a compile & quick
test if you don't mind and then upon confirmation, I'll update the mirror.
☟︎☟︎ mod6: lemme compile &
test with the new patches + shiva 1 & 2 + fix
jurov: i just happened to stumble upon it cuz vulpes'
test data has only one - alf's signature per patch
ascii_butugychag: mircea_popescu: i can see it. sorta 'shit
test', anyone who proposes any fork which refuses it, has to answer for himself
mod6: compiled just fine, just kicked it off for a quick
test...
Tasoshi: So Satoshi's great
test to determine whether bitcoin can operate through decentralised consensus is now on. mircea_popescu, I have been looking at some old posts and it seemed that in 2013 you agreed with Satoshi and his vision. What exactly did you learn in 2013 to turn yourself against Satoshi's vision itself?
assbot: Logged on 31-01-2016 18:13:52; mod6: danielpbarron: hey there Sir, wanna update the wiki &
test the steps from a newb standpoint when you get a moment? Y^
jurov: (example: [BTC-dev] Some
test patches and my V implementation)
assbot: Logged on 31-01-2016 17:53:21; mod6: <+ben_vulpes> yo mod6 what does it mean in perl to do my $var = "string" . \n "otherstring" is the period a linebreak escape in perl, and the variable implicitly a concatenation of the two strings << where do you see this? this is not a thing. that would fail to compile/pass-interpreter-smell-
test.
mod6: im gonna
test this revised patch, if works, send it, then get that SoBA in ship-shape.
mod6: I'm going to build with this and live
test it before I submit to the mailing list.
mircea_popescu: wouldn't it be best to
test before documenting a feature ? :D
mod6: so if you see activity in that direction, ask for a
test bundle or
test code, whatever. good to catch any things like this before I send itout.
mod6: danielpbarron: hey there Sir, wanna update the wiki &
test the steps from a newb standpoint when you get a moment? Y^
☟︎ mod6: <+ben_vulpes> ;;later tell mod6 stick a random file with .html suffix in the patches dir to reproduce the stale gnupg dir big << this is what I'll
test with.
mod6: <+ben_vulpes> yo mod6 what does it mean in perl to do my $var = "string" . \n "otherstring" is the period a linebreak escape in perl, and the variable implicitly a concatenation of the two strings << where do you see this? this is not a thing. that would fail to compile/pass-interpreter-smell-
test.
☟︎ assbot: Logged on 30-01-2016 18:40:13; mod6: so -- i might need several weeks at min to
test out v99995 of V
mod6: <+shinohai> ok mod6
test completed, did not have to set set the perl option before building << ok good deal, i assume that the PERL_MM_OPT thing is an evironment deal.
shinohai: ok mod6
test completed, did not have to set set the perl option before building
phf: i pressed it programmatically, without "patch" utility, before leaving home, so didnt have time to
test it
mod6: for the sake of this
test, i'll just rename these in my .seals dir as they should be.
mod6: so -- i might need several weeks at min to
test out v99995 of V
☟︎