17 entries in 0.625s
ninjashogun: Thanks. Does someone who has gribble with the proper distance want to
trust me to whatever extent is required for an up. Ascii has complained about the volume of contribution, so I will keep it down. (obvoiusly you can
remove this rating if you find I'm abusive.)
ThickAsThieves: basically you can fault havelock's quality, and there is where you can
remove trust ThickAsThieves: rassah, you can't
remove trust from the sytem, you can only move it to where you prefer
fluffypony: dooglus is going to have to
remove his positive
trust rating, lol
ThickAsThieves: i line a repeated a few times at the bitcoin conference: "You can't
remove trust from transactions, you can only design it to be where you prefer it"
ThickAsThieves: lol forumite says to me "What would it possibly take for you to
remove the negative
trust you left me?"
BingoBoingo: numerisTrade: Well I plan to
remove/expire this loaned
trust on Thursday unless we can find something to risk and establish a longer term lending of
trust over.
BingoBoingo: fluffypony: I mean people can /ignore, but if the person who socially engineers
trust for the purpose of spamming gets to self up, the only recourse is for the L1 to
remove their
trust or themselves be dropped
mircea_popescu: fluffypony the btctalk wot is broken discussion was carried when thermos first made it. the conclusion pretty much went like "well it's not really all that broken, in that you can
remove him from your
trust line. a default population is useful cause derps otherwise wouldn';t even understand wtf it is"
ozbot: Please
remove Chaang Noi (Goat) or BadBear from default
trust list
kakobrekla: >If you mistrust Garr255, use the
trust system. I'm not going to
remove anyone from the default
trust network for rating Garr255 negatively. But scammer tags require a more severe crime than just going against the expectations of bidders.