log☇︎
3100+ entries in 0.219s
adlai: asciilifeform: "port" in the loose sense of the word. let's rephrase that as "some poor code monkey should write a keccak vpatch for trb, but nobody should ever have to use it"
mircea_popescu: at no point was it proposed that trb does.
adlai: but i don't think trb should initiate a fork.
adlai: mircea_popescu: hmmm. ok, this is a valid question, my answer to which is: port Luke-Jr's keccak reset from "classic" to trb, and be ready to activate it, should a fork occur.
mircea_popescu: adlai wouldja think for a moment ? if miners fork tomorrow, pre-miner-fork trb will not be defensible. because bitfury (you know, kakobrekla's friends) have access to vc capital, and will bridge the gap between us printing press and chinese mining.
asciilifeform: or introduction of material from either into a future trb
assbot: Logged on 17-02-2016 12:54:09; asciilifeform: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=17-02-2016#1408030 << it had own genesis to establish pedigree with the historic tinyscheme. but shiva is a patch that bridges it into the trb tree. and yes i rebased it, it works with the current trb.
solrodar: I did the trb call graphing work last year
polarbeard: sup trb, any development going on since my patches got fired? B)
shinohai: ;;later tell mod6 gentoo trb v99995 was a success
mod6: shinohai: cool! what do you wanna test? probably should get all the pre-req's installed and then build trb with the latest build script: http://deedot.org/build-bitcoind-V99995.sh
trinque: I have trb dev time today. it does not address the point made about education and its function in a culture
mircea_popescu: so basically you propose - wait and see on trb, meanwhile i'll also develop a fork variant which i won't either share or have ready in time ?
asciilifeform: i will maintain trb, while 1,001 things incl. writing mine.
asciilifeform: if trb gets chainclobbered - it is 2009 again for us.
mircea_popescu: so in this sense, "trb as is only" opens us up to being forced, later on, to pick among the idiots.
mircea_popescu: there is a very specific danger which you perhaps are not seeing. if indeed we continu with trb as is, and if indeed 3) happens, as these two share pow and we don't control .7 or so exahash we become extremelty vulnerable. recall the fate of altcoin ?
mircea_popescu: but you should note, that there is no good reason to consider current trb so much different from cases 1-3.
mircea_popescu: in any case trb isn't going anywhere, nor need it go anywhere.
mircea_popescu: at this juncture, tmsr must make the decision if it will continue strictly with trb, or ALSO offer a tmsr fork of trb.
asciilifeform: and where did trb go ?
jurov: i was thinking about it as potential learning practice for trb... but such things would make alf shit girder beams
assbot: Logged on 10-03-2016 12:41:33; asciilifeform: i was willing to deal with the cpp miseryu of trb because 1) it pre-dates bitcoin being valuable 2) it was - and remains - the schelling point, 'father's pistols'
danielpbarron: next work is maintaining said trb
danielpbarron: how much do you need for this year off to build sane trb ? maybe we can crowdfund it
assbot: Logged on 10-03-2016 10:43:06; mircea_popescu: in other news - it still remains likely that this summer will see a bevy of various hardforks on offer. practically speaking, trb can offer either its own candidate, which takes a lot of work, or else sit tight and we'll follow the more intelligent of the avaialble offerings, which takes less work but also implies a lot of risk - experience to date shows that there's precious little intelligence avai
asciilifeform: jurov: it is for working on trb !
shinohai: I will use trb as long as it works on the overall network, failing that I will have to find something else to occupy my time.
asciilifeform: i was willing to deal with the cpp miseryu of trb because 1) it pre-dates bitcoin being valuable 2) it was - and remains - the schelling point, 'father's pistols' ☟︎
assbot: Logged on 10-03-2016 10:43:06; mircea_popescu: in other news - it still remains likely that this summer will see a bevy of various hardforks on offer. practically speaking, trb can offer either its own candidate, which takes a lot of work, or else sit tight and we'll follow the more intelligent of the avaialble offerings, which takes less work but also implies a lot of risk - experience to date shows that there's precious little intelligence avai
mircea_popescu: in other news - it still remains likely that this summer will see a bevy of various hardforks on offer. practically speaking, trb can offer either its own candidate, which takes a lot of work, or else sit tight and we'll follow the more intelligent of the avaialble offerings, which takes less work but also implies a lot of risk - experience to date shows that there's precious little intelligence available outside the w ☟︎☟︎
mircea_popescu: trinque> rather than dissect it, I wish to stop using the wallet entirely (as I did before with btcd) and just write a sendrawtxn for shiva <<< a raw tx manipulator for trb is prolly a very useful item, really.
asciilifeform: so i go and send on another box and guess what, it had previous trb, and tx is high-s.
asciilifeform: that trb chokes on, during rescan, and quits.
assbot: trb ... ( http://bit.ly/1SP5343 )
PeterL: so, as I have been watching my trb node sync the past three months (am I the only person who thinks this takes way too long?) it seems like it spends alot of time trying to connect to nodes and timing out?
asciilifeform: the ~only thing i know about mpb is that 1) it is roughly compatible with 0.6 and 2) he fixed the db locks bug years ago, and shared with me the patch, a while back, and it is in trb
assbot: Logged on 10-02-2016 02:24:16; nubbins`: speak now if you believe a lord that has contributed TRB patches, who owns the second-largest s.mg stock warrant, who trades in the only physical collectibles that are priced solely in BTC, who pays the bill for eulora.org, who is the republic's de facto minister of letters awaiting with bated quill the whittling-down of a codebase fit to publish, should be stripped of his title; speak your treason now, th
asciilifeform: if your client barfs when working with trb, patch your client.
asciilifeform: dooglus: when trb disagrees with prb, prb is ipso facto wrong.
nubbins`: or mod6, by all accounts a great guy, head of TRB, almost quit in the first week because he couldn't get a gentoo install up and running.
PeterL: if trb sees A1 and A2, which does it keep?
PeterL: does trb do replace by fee?
assbot: Logged on 07-03-2016 15:38:44; dooglus: oh, I was also wondering - is it normal that the trb build process downloads and builds the linux kernel?
asciilifeform: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=07-03-2016#1424721 << this is not actually correct, it should build only gcc and toolchain, then trb. ☝︎
nubbins`: dooglus: are you saying that trb nodes are eventually ignored by core nodes simply due to trb passing enormously large messages?
dooglus: oh, I was also wondering - is it normal that the trb build process downloads and builds the linux kernel? ☟︎
assbot: Successfully added a rating of 2 for dooglus with note: ran one of the best dice sites of all times, before being torpedoed by fiat government posturing. trb testing.
mircea_popescu: !rate dooglus 2 ran one of the best dice sites of all times, before being torpedoed by fiat government posturing. trb testing.
dooglus: core doesn't like messages bigger than 2MB, and trb sends ~7MB messages
dooglus: I was looking at trb, and trying to sync it from my bitcoin core node
shinohai: Not a lord here, but I have a lot of time invested in trb and I agree with danielpbarron.
nubbins`: FTR i've been teaching myself hardcover bookbinding and TRB.book would have been gorgeous
shinohai: Well Gentleman, I have certainly enjoyed working with you all on trb from the past ~1 year nonetheless.
mircea_popescu: what do you expect changed with trb ? you weren't doing it to get rich, were you ? you weren't doing it for redditettes to throw their panties at you, were you ?
asciilifeform: except that i have nfi what we're doing with trb.
mircea_popescu: note that my interest in computers is, these days, ~strictly predicated on trb.
mod6: is there anything in anyones opinion that the foundation could do with trb to move past this problem?
shinohai: without trb, Bitcoin is basically useless. To me anyway.
BingoBoingo: mod6: Well, work on a trb with a new genesis block could be an interesting skeleton for altcoin. It opens the door to flensing far deeper.
mircea_popescu: mod6 your call to make, together with ben_vulpes i guess - the point remains, if no trb offering in july, no trb offering in july.
mod6: if this is all correct, then i agree with alf. there is no reason to continue work on trb - we should suspend, indefinately, all efforts therein. At least until somehow we have a re-write that resolves these issues.
BingoBoingo: I mean the vacation that lets you afford other vacations. You know the one where you sit in a cabin to make trb fork. Not full adacoin, but the possibility of adacoin.
mircea_popescu: i suppose IF the july many-fork time comes and trb has nothing to offer then it might as well close. ☟︎
asciilifeform: so trb foundation closes today?
mircea_popescu: ideally trb will at that time be ready to propose one of its own.
asciilifeform: jurov: works great in practice. in your trb node.
gernika: I finally have a fully synced trb node, after starting on the project almost a year ago.
asciilifeform: could far more easily declare, as trb does, 'tx is only valid if inputs are confirmed in existing block.'
asciilifeform: sturles: it is pointedly NOT 'how it is' in trb.
asciilifeform: trb does not deal in mights.
asciilifeform: sturles: trb WON'T ACCEPT a tx with even ONE unconfirmed input.
mircea_popescu: anyway, if you're curious, what trb is contemplating to eventually do is a ring buffer with a per-kb fee only as the criteria.
shinohai: Seinfeld plays happily in the background as i do trb work.
pete_dushenski: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=02-03-2016#1420315 << go figure that this ~exact~ tx withholding experience (combined with coincidence of trinque's and mod6's excellent scripts) lead me to set up battlefield trb node, which, yes, is defended with life. who says rape isn't educative ?! this is my asshole goddamit !!1 ☝︎
asciilifeform: run moar trb.
asciilifeform: i have 3-4 trb nodez going, just on house lan, at all times, so backup sorta solves itself.
trinque: never a bad thing to have a weekly cron which stops trb gently, rsync's blockchain elsewhere, restarts
asciilifeform: shinohai: i think it is interesting that i've been kill -9 'ing trb since day 1 and never had this problem.
shinohai: I am cursing bitcoin today - had my first trb database crash ... evidently I did not back up *everything* required and must now start my first node from scratch.
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: trb didn't even get off the runway until magic constants, recall.
mircea_popescu: i distinctly recal trb nearly sunk in the other incident, while mpb provided the magic constants. why was that ?
asciilifeform: i distinctly recall that trb sailed through the july incident while mpb did not.
mircea_popescu: which aren't, at the present time, trb-tethered. it's a goal, but into the future.
mircea_popescu: kakobrekla> one thing that goes through my mind is that trb/mps << this is true, but let me clarify that An set of txn were broadcast through a set of > 1k distinct peers. most of which i don't regard as peers in any sense, but nevertheless they did get to hear about them from my own nodes.
kakobrekla: one thing that goes through my mind is that trb/mps infrastructure is on the border of 'consensus' behavior of most nodes. this makes it more susceptible to odd/unwanted shit happening.
punkman: so one thing that hasn't been mentioned, does trb even replace transactions when new one comes in with higher fee?
mircea_popescu: kakobrekla and guess what - trb gets blackholed now and again. prb never mattered.
kakobrekla: even different trb build do different stuff.
kakobrekla: there isnt one. trb behaves differently than prb if nothing else.
kakobrekla: its possible you are connected to a node pocket - trb do not like non-trb nodeas (ban hammer) so they are only left connected (mostly) to trb, not prb which you need if you want the world to see your txes
asciilifeform: not related to dulap except in the fact that both are trb nodes.
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: dulap is not only platform for phuctor, but will host 'g', gossip, etc., and is presently the largest and most reliable trb battleship. and i will pay for it personally, because wtf.
shinohai: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=01-03-2016#1418918 <<< if I may interject, I have yet to have a trb recompile take longer than an hour even if I bork something up. ☝︎
jurov: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=01-03-2016#1418803 sadly, i don't really have any trb workflow. except that i sit down on it for few days once few months ☝︎
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform i was tempted throughout eulora lifetime to go "fu, no binaries, compile, always". and i can still contemplate why this would be the case with trb.
BingoBoingo: Dropped in low-s a month or two (mebbe 3) before trb, has -minrelaytx flag, from trb orphanage slaughters and malleus were definitely implemented. Other things but would take reading to recall them.
BingoBoingo: I have a partially trb-icized 7 series in the name of implementation pluralism. No earthly idea what all changes happened.
assbot: Logged on 29-02-2016 20:19:25; asciilifeform: anyone ever build a working trb on openbsd ?
asciilifeform: i don't recall a ~rotor~ trb working there.