4423 entries in 0.399s
BigBitz:
danielpbarron yes agree with that also.
kakobrekla:
danielpbarron no, you seemed to me like you have some first hand experience with that, so i asked.
kakobrekla:
danielpbarron are you an expert on this field?
BigBitz:
danielpbarron sure... plausiable.
cgcardona: ;;rate
danielpbarron 1 #bitcoin-assets regular
cgcardona: ;;rate
danielpbarron #bitcoin-assets regular
cgcardona:
danielpbarron: mircea_popescu well that was waaaay easier than I expected
mircea_popescu:
danielpbarron you know we go back a ways, he called out bfl originally, mpoe-pr backed him later on.
cgcardona_:
danielpbarron: yea I'll go check right now actually.
mircea_popescu:
danielpbarron: has anyone in here ever floated the idea of bringing the WoT to twitter? << i dun think i'd want that really. but maybe a gpg-based ircitter may be interesting.
rithm: would it be terrible if you couldn't get voiced in her
danielpbarron assbot:
danielpbarron, you can't do that to rithm.
assbot: rithm, you can't do that to
danielpbarron.
rithm: !down
danielpbarron TestingUnoDosTre:
danielpbarron I can not offer commentary on trustworthiness of dignork. He helped me sign up a gpg key on my tablet while I was traveling for work. I have never done any business with him
benkay:
danielpbarron: you've been accumulating some interesting ratings.
Naphex:
danielpbarron: dexX7 i'm thinking like listen to a port/unix socket
Naphex:
danielpbarron: linux would be fine, but make sure you don't run other stuff
artifexd: thestringpuller: You are describing cold storage. It sounds like
danielpbarron is looking for warm storage.
ozbot: Twitter / JuicyGrabs: @
danielpbarron What? Haha. ...
mircea_popescu:
danielpbarron oh i see. yep, you got a solid point there.
gribble: Rating entry successful. Your rating for user
danielpbarron has changed from 1 to 1.
cgcardona_: ;;rate
danielpbarron 1 #bitcoin-assets regular and defended me when a scammer squatted on my nick in #bitcoin-otc
fluffypony:
danielpbarron: I find myself torn...I think that SR was an interesting endeavour, and I applaud his efforts in providing a platform, but I think organising six murders is taking Internet-tough-guy too far
fluffypony:
danielpbarron: don't get me wrong, I love the idea of a decentralised exchange, but the idea of just about anyone anonymously running an unregistered, unregulated company just seems to be asking for trouble
gribble: Rating entry successful. Your rating of 1 for user
danielpbarron has been recorded.
Naphex:
danielpbarron: one of the main programmers behind it
mircea_popescu:
danielpbarron it's a rational move in some circumstances, especially no limit
BingoBoingo:
danielpbarron: It read like a pretty big something
assbot: Voicing
danielpbarron for 30 minutes.
benkay: take
danielpbarron for instance
bounce: he's missing bounce (oi!), checkdavid,
danielpbarron, joecool, punkman
assbot: Voicing
danielpbarron for 30 minutes.
MisterE:
danielpbarron: BOA would not let coinbase use their verification if they weren't trustworthy
minersdidit:
danielpbarron: you are clueless. producing an ASIC costs nothing, just becuase some scam companies sell them to retail tards for 20,000% markup does not mean they cost alot to make. the concentrated miners are producing BTC for next to free.
MisterE:
danielpbarron: thats exactly what happend
minersdidit:
danielpbarron yea and localbitcoins has like a 3-10% spread.
minersdidit:
danielpbarron um when did i bring up central banking or fiat?
minersdidit:
danielpbarron of course they are true. we can observe it occuring
minersdidit:
danielpbarron: because economies are fractals they arent linear
kanzure:
danielpbarron: this is the sort of hyper-fanatacism that i am seeking
fluffypony:
danielpbarron: yeah that's what I figured
fluffypony:
danielpbarron: she meant for holiday, we would never move there
benkay: care to share,
danielpbarron ?
pankkake:
danielpbarron: is it something real?
benkay: fascinating,
danielpbarron benkay: which handles,
danielpbarron ?
Apocalyptic:
danielpbarron, yeah that's a good approach in learning
kakobrekla: <
danielpbarron> i don't trust fiat-based business ideas anymore; done with it < BAT U GOTSTA DIVERSIFUCK
benkay:
danielpbarron: do you have this 'hoarders will starve' thesis of yours written out anywhere in more detail than 140 characters including a link allows for?
benkay: what are you doing here,
danielpbarron ?
benkay: and who are you,
danielpbarron thestringpuller:
danielpbarron: depends on if the business touches fiat ever...
Luke-Jr:
danielpbarron: Catholicism is based on Christ's teachings, not the Bible. the Church is also not "in Europe", but universal.
Luke-Jr: jurov:
danielpbarron is absolutely right to demand miracles to testify to shepherds who cannot trace their authority to the Apostles
jurov:
danielpbarron: Matthew 4,1-11
Luke-Jr:
danielpbarron: anyhow, to finish off with this page: Catholicism *does* condemn homosexuals and muslims; even the Apotles baptised infants, as is necessary for their salvation; Christ's grace *is* sufficient to completely cleanse us of sin, but only if we make good use of it - otherwise we will need purgatory to deal with what we have been unwilling to change about our evilness
jurov:
danielpbarron requesting miracles shows tongue of the Evil
jurov:
danielpbarron: ofc it does. but it's still infallible in every moment
Luke-Jr:
danielpbarron: no, nor is there a real distinction
jurov:
danielpbarron: not. there is "biblical thelogy" and there is "Tradition of Catholic Church"
Luke-Jr:
danielpbarron: any teaching of the Church (on matters of faith or moralS)
jurov:
danielpbarron: the catechism
Luke-Jr:
danielpbarron: if you don't make amends, it's questionable whether you were serious about repentence, at least.
Luke-Jr:
danielpbarron: repenting is a prerequisite to making amends, it isn't amends in itself
Luke-Jr:
danielpbarron: by sinning, we offend God and ought to make amends; whether one is damned is based solely on his being on good terms with God (ie, not in a state of mortal sin)
Luke-Jr:
danielpbarron: twofold: 1) to make amends to God; 2) to give up legitimate pleasure, as practice for subjecting our bodies to our will so that when we are tempted to do evil, we can resist it better
Luke-Jr:
danielpbarron: not of themselves, no
Luke-Jr:
danielpbarron: keep in mind that the Catholic Church *produced* the Bible. so if you question the Church, there is no basis to accept its product either
Luke-Jr:
danielpbarron: which ones do you question?
Luke-Jr:
danielpbarron: furthermore, the Church's laws about abstinence from meat on certain days, goes back to the Apostles; they were already in place and Timothy practiced them himself
Luke-Jr:
danielpbarron: He speaks of the Gnostics, the Marcionites, the Eneratites, the Manicheans, and other ancient heretics, who absolutely condemned marriage, and the use of all kind of meat; because they pretended that all flesh was from an evil principle. Whereas the church of God, so far from condemning marriage, holds it a holy sacrament; and forbids it to none but such as by vow have chosen the better part: and prohibits not the use of any
Luke-Jr:
danielpbarron: shall I go through it lie by lie?
Luke-Jr:
danielpbarron: this page is of the devil, full of lies