13 entries in 0.761s
mircea_popescu: but yes, asciilifeform 's suspicion is very much my own -- the "
chuka writer" and the "
chuka reader" circles are very close to identity.
mircea_popescu: phf wouldn't you expect, if market encouraged cooperation, for fucking to be most common in market-driven societies and least common in marketless ones ? whereas europe has a fertility problem and
chuka very much does not ?
mircea_popescu: i know for a fact kgb had
chuka defection directorate because hey, during the groznii siege all the signals folk involved had "experience in the problem".
mircea_popescu: no, see, you're thinking "to the west" with such intensity it can't even be voiced. suppose for the sake of argument, defect to
chuka. why not ?
mircea_popescu: anyway, imo the principal point of the discussion is that knowledge, any knowledge, enacts a partition upon the world. this is the only difference - chucka and man are distinguished not by skin color, not by anything else but the overpowering fact that
chuka doesn't know what to do with the rtg ; or with pushkin ; or with etcetera.
mircea_popescu: idiots without a culture and without a history. "we found that lantern in the woods, and boy, those were the best days of
chuka life!!1"
mircea_popescu: the way we do things has no appeal except to serve the way we think. yet, ape-ing is constant. stealing bits of trilema is like
chuka raiding rtg in siberia, yet chukas do raid. on it goes.
mircea_popescu: ~
chuka, or if you prefer iroquis level of mental retardation.