23 entries in 0.415s
shinohai: I applaud the guy for at least putting up
warrant canary on server
ascii_field: 'Fwd: [Cryptography] Did Intel just execute its
warrant canary ?'
TomServo: This being the '
warrant canary'?
BingoBoingo: I suppose that is also a concern. Maybe the current practice for the
warrant canary lacks room for improvement.
BingoBoingo: Sign a message asserting that passing the balance between the two addresses fuctions as your
warrant canary and GPG crypt the message to a few trusted parties that can release the signed doc if the behavior consituting the
canary ceases
BingoBoingo: Why, because they aren't Apple who has the press gloss over "The
canary died because it became unecessary, not because a
warrant came to kill it"
BingoBoingo: mircea_popescu: The header text on the libressl.org page is part of the jpg with the pufferfish. If the
warrant canary triggers the header text becomes comic sans is my reading of it.
assbot: Apple's "
Warrant Canary" Has Died - Slashdot
mircea_popescu: "While Apple won't confirm it, the company has removed its
warrant canary from its latest transparency report, issued this week. While this could mean that the company has received a new secret government order to provide user data, there is still another more likely possibility: it's not publishing
warrant canaries at all."