7900+ entries in 0.657s
decimation: about 80
% of usg depends on these kinds of 'willingly' gotchas
decimation: mircea_popescu: 90
% of modern 'journalism' is 'the story behind the story behind the story', most of which is bullshit
Luke-Jr: 95
% for 1000 blocks, while only 51
% is needed
mircea_popescu: ;;later tell pete_dushenski "I’m not sure how this level of thrills compares with, say, Eulora" << disfavourably. 50
% returns not that uncommon, but i just brought home 4200 grass on a 2 axes + 400 threads run (like 220
%).
mircea_popescu: Short Term Steps Use the Intel and ARM optimized SHA256 routines, which increase SHA256 speed by about 80
%. << NO.
ascii_field: trinque: even the 'project olympic games' team at nsa seems to use 100
% vs
BingoBoingo: Reddit still shows 40+ points inspite of being 40
% downvoted.
assbot: Logged on 09-07-2015 14:50:35; asciilifeform: we launch the pogos, and suddenly 'ntp is obsolete, dontchaknow,' here is a new replacement by poettering, 85
% consensus1111!!!1111!!! within weeks, plug pulled on ntp servers
mircea_popescu: BitFury pool (~ 16
% of hashrate) drops their max block size to 135 kB amidst large mempool backlog << check out all the gavin miner support.
assbot: Logged on 09-07-2015 12:58:26; punkman: "I wish I had the money to setup enough miners myself to get 95
% hashing power and just freaking fork already."
mircea_popescu: do the math, sometime. a miner earns 0.2
% or some shit.
punkman: "I wish I had the money to setup enough miners myself to get 95
% hashing power and just freaking fork already."
☟︎ assbot: Logged on 09-07-2015 00:53:52; asciilifeform: at least 10
% of the page should be occupied by letters.
decimation: if 99
% of miners use usg time, what's the use of wot-time?
decimation: about 80
% of it: use ntp! no time itself is owned by usg and so are all servers and isps!
BingoBoingo: <asciilifeform> BingoBoingo: she will get laid that day. whereas 90
%+ of normal-looking blokes - won't. << She apparently even managed to fuck this up. Reportedly gave friend sad handjob and blackmailed for attention the next day with promise of putting out eventually. Was driven to bar in the ghetto and left (could not run to vehicle in time to stop it)
assbot: BitBet - Bitcoin main net block size to increase in 2015 :: 3.84 B (13
%) on Yes, 25.68 B (87
%) on No | closing in 4 months 1 week| weight: 41`573 (100`000 to 1) ... (
http://bit.ly/1flrrAF )
ascii_field: the chart needs to account for literally 100
% of the src lines
assbot: I took a loan at 25
% on prosper and put it on ltc - panic attack from the price going down : litecoin ... (
http://bit.ly/1IHx47D )
jurov: folks. "hackedteam" leak is 99
% downloaded, but i don't really have a place to publicly host it
ascii_field: thing is, i can easily see these becoming 99
% of the relay mass
mircea_popescu: this is a horribru example. so, miner has 10
% of the hash, 10
% of the bnlocks are badly timed. what of it, pogo resets on the remainder.
mircea_popescu: then, of THOSE POOLS it turned out that ~50
% are too confused to even lie.
assbot: Logged on 07-07-2015 02:26:24; asciilifeform: thestringpuller: unless i seriously misunderstand, 50
%+ of the hash rate belongs to folks ~who aren't even running bitcoin~ but a toystore version
shinohai: I thought that the 0.1
% per 1 BTC transacted was reasonable, as set out in the Declaration of Sovereignty.
cazalla: for something like 0.5
% of the hashrate
decimation: 00:06:24 mircea_popescu: "Note that the roughly 50
% of the network that was SPV mining had explicitly indicated that they would enforce the BIP66 rules. By not doing so,
ascii_field: 'Note that the roughly 50
% of the network that was SPV mining...' << can haz network without 50
% hash power belonging to diagnosable retarded folks plz ??!!
decimation: in the existing network, I suspect 99
% of the miners are using ntpd traceable to some usg organ
jurov: shinohai: yes, it works wrt rtorrent, 1
% done
mircea_popescu: maybe magnet:?dn=Hacked+Team&tr=udp
%3A
%2F
%2Fcoppersurfer.tk
%3A6969
%2Fannounce&xt=urn
%3Abtih
%3AKFQDX74I4CQ3HOWTSYTBJF4JFHE5E2KV ?
mircea_popescu: if that 1
% doesn't feel the state like a glove, the state's gone. kinda like my ancient "the state may exist inasmuch as and for as long as i can't tell it's there."
☟︎ williamdunne: "The number of Romanians and Bulgarians working in the UK has risen by 15
% year-on-year, Office for National Statistics (ONS) figures show. In the last three months of 2014 there were 172,000 people working in the UK who had been born in one of the two eastern European countries"
mircea_popescu: i bet you it's because all he had were cheapo units that always demoisturize to a certain
% as result of their function, rather than actually CONDITION the air
punkman: cazalla: will they casually mine 5
% of blocks in a year?
mircea_popescu: "Note that the roughly 50
% of the network that was SPV mining had explicitly indicated that they would enforce the BIP66 rules. By not doing so, several large miners have lost over $50,000 dollars worth of mining income so far."
mircea_popescu: really the
% of income "just known" vs "information acquired" is the proper measure.
mircea_popescu: if as much as 66
% comes that way and the other 33
% has to be found out about... o baby.
mircea_popescu: atm 99.x
% of income comes through this immediate, sent-from-heaven-above channel
mircea_popescu: so what, is "95
% consensus" going to gavincoin next ? for ... all of six blocks again ? cool.
mircea_popescu: 4. the people who voted did so as all people voting ever do : blankly, mouth only. then, someone mined a v2 block on top of a v3 block (which to them look identical) and the supposed 95
% majority that promised by that vote to distinguish failed to distinguish. well, half of them or so. the other half distinguished
assbot: Logged on 04-07-2015 05:26:45; decimation: I would also note that the bitcoind github commits and comments lie about the IsSuperMajority machine. They say that the mandatory rejection won't take effect until 95
% of the blocks are incremented - but in fact it's only 950
decimation: I would also note that the bitcoind github commits and comments lie about the IsSuperMajority machine. They say that the mandatory rejection won't take effect until 95
% of the blocks are incremented - but in fact it's only 950
☟︎ ben_vulpes: "Except BIP 66 received 95
% support from the relevant group (miners). " << ehuehuehehueeueueueueueeeee
assbot: Logged on 03-07-2015 21:35:10; kakobrekla: the switch happens when there is 90
% of miners on the new chain (determined by checking last n blocks rolling window)
kakobrekla: 90
% < thats just the breaking point. once they figure out they have no wehre to send those coins short of mpex, those will be gone too.
mircea_popescu: kakobrekla a loss of 90
% mining power relates to blocks taking a little over an hour, not a month.
kakobrekla: the switch happens when there is 90
% of miners on the new chain (determined by checking last n blocks rolling window)
☟︎ mircea_popescu: but in any case : money talks. not "power rangers" and not the 0.3
% ROI miners. and if moneys says fuck you everyone goes home and tries something else for next year's costume party.
ascii_field: anyway, 99+
% of usa ALREADY works for room & board !
decimation: yeah about 90
% of the libertarians I've encoutnered on the internet and otherwise are socialists with reservations
mod6:
%bal 1FundZy7m7b8begbh9haCguKJcAdFopRJ9