3225 entries in 1.062s
danielpbarron: i have a
trb node that is not yet full, currently at block 312275
mircea_popescu: cool, ima run up a node from that cluster including the known
trb nodes specifically. if you want to get yours included davout or anyone else pm me an ip.
punkman: CVE-2012-2459 isn't though, maybe a good thing to fix next
trb release
mircea_ahoy: nobody's actually involved in making bitcoin not suck. there's a large group of idiots involved in trying to make themselves look good, and there's
trb trying to make bitcoin be less g narly.
mircea_popescu: as such, it is conceivable that z-80 powered
trb can actually drive into the ground 12nm process powered united-prbs.
mircea_popescu: incidentally, i've been thinking lots about your famous silicone whine. (ie, "
trb can't exist until etching plant"). from a twu wuv perspective, what we actually need is an alternate technology. i am guessing that a) it will exist and b) whoever deploys it will be
trb anyway.
pete_dushenski: much credit is due to the whole
trb team for developing the package as we enjoy it today
mircea_popescu: ascii_rear one theory would be that he was going to
trb it.
shinohai: o/ pete_dushenski enjoy your
trb node!
adlai: damnit mod6, isn't that a fiat thing? someday
trb should fix the calendar, too
assbot: Logged on 22-12-2015 04:58:44; mircea_popescu: anyway, for pete_d and anyone else who might have encountered difficulty with
trb or fears they might : it's actually rather painless. 1. you create an account on a server ; 2. you cd /home/account_name ; 3. you create a .wot directory (mkdir .wot) ; 4. you put the pubkeys of people you trust in there as name1.asc, name2.asc etc ; 5. you download the rotor script (curl deedbot.org/build-bitcoind-9999
adlai: brb bullshitting it off
trb financial statements
mircea_popescu: or maybe he was going to do the equivalent of the
trb but for debian and well... couldn't have that.
mircea_popescu:
http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=28-12-2015#1355361 << quite. all this verbiage about how "oh lalala, if miners stop enforcing X fork they will be excluded" fails to account for the fact that unlike the various PRBs,
TRB does NOT actually implement any of the soft forks. so no, they won't be "excluded". nobody will notice they stopped.
☝︎☟︎ assbot: Successfully added a rating of 1 for shinohai with note:
trb scout
pete_dushenski: mnope. that one has a larger breadth than contravex
trb timleline part i could handle. maybe in part ii.
pete_dushenski: 1.25 years of development of
trb is equivalent to multiples of that in row
pete_dushenski: ;;later tell mod6 my pleasure and thanks for the correction. i was confusing december 19th entries, it seems. i've updated that section of the
trb timeline accordingly.
ben_vulpes: and miscellaneous other pasteshites who shit crlfs and waste precious
trb time
ben_vulpes: that's what i've been doing, but it's not working and i'm still seeing heinous linefeed issues hamstringing and tripping up
trb scouts
mircea_popescu: <punkman> isn't verifyall equivalent to no checkpoints? << in
trb yes. otherwise... complicated.
ben_vulpes: why the everloving fuck would
trb care about rtrees
mircea_popescu: this is the problem of having a
trb in the first place : the temptation to assume it's sane is just too great.
shinohai: qt is just a bloated monstrosity. I love
trb even more because it lacks any part of it.
assbot: Logged on 22-12-2015 06:37:41; ben_vulpes: interesting to note the various timelines for replication of
trb work
mircea_popescu: <ben_vulpes> interesting to note the various timelines for replication of
trb work <<< quite.
ben_vulpes: interesting to note the various timelines for replication of
trb work
☟︎ mircea_popescu: anyway, for pete_d and anyone else who might have encountered difficulty with
trb or fears they might : it's actually rather painless. 1. you create an account on a server ; 2. you cd /home/account_name ; 3. you create a .wot directory (mkdir .wot) ; 4. you put the pubkeys of people you trust in there as name1.asc, name2.asc etc ; 5. you download the rotor script (curl deedbot.org/build-bitcoind-99997K.sh > build-bitco
☟︎ mircea_popescu: prolly should exist on the main page of
trb site, at that.
mod6: <+mircea_popescu> as it is i put .wot in /
trb/.wot but the .seals are still up one level ;/ << noted.
mircea_popescu: as it is i put .wot in /
trb/.wot but the .seals are still up one level ;/
assbot: Logged on 21-12-2015 21:21:34; pete_dushenski: mircea_popescu: but your controlling point about whose dominion is a thing is well taken. the boundaries here are very loosely defined, and yet so broad that i'm bound to miss important things, but mostly as these important things relate to
trb development, an area where my only experience was debian testing and v-verification this summer
assbot: Logged on 21-12-2015 21:24:59; mircea_popescu: asciilifeform remind me, where's teh instructions for pressing a
trb ?
pete_dushenski: this set of newly delivered readings is just some of the competition for my time that retards my learnings of
trb and related subjects
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform remind me, where's teh instructions for pressing a
trb ?
☟︎ pete_dushenski: mircea_popescu: but your controlling point about whose dominion is a thing is well taken. the boundaries here are very loosely defined, and yet so broad that i'm bound to miss important things, but mostly as these important things relate to
trb development, an area where my only experience was debian testing and v-verification this summer
☟︎ BingoBoingo: But the alf experiment of see how many nodes
trb needs before being censored is worth at least two chuckles
mircea_popescu: Thinking in those terms, "Hey,
TRB actually running on BSD as opposded to PRB sounds to me like it'd be huge, it must be made a point of public communication, I need datas to support me in discussing this with people, plox to help me here!" is a helluva lot more productive than "this is X's dominion". At the worst this will clarify that "nah, not really", at the best it'll help a lot of idiots understand why it nobody
assbot: Logged on 21-12-2015 06:25:36; pete_dushenski: besides, is not
trb news the dominion of mod6 'state of bitcoin addresses' or qntra ? i can certainly qntra, but i guess i'm not equipped to appreciate the significance of glibc-less-netbsd
BingoBoingo: pete_dushenski: As penance you should fire up a
trb node to test the new version string patch
pete_dushenski: and thank god it's only part of b-a because the
trb-dev stuff is waywaywayway over my head
pete_dushenski: besides, is not
trb news the dominion of mod6 'state of bitcoin addresses' or qntra ? i can certainly qntra, but i guess i'm not equipped to appreciate the significance of glibc-less-netbsd
☟︎ assbot: Logged on 21-12-2015 00:03:55; mircea_popescu: <asciilifeform> incidentally the de-glibc-ized
trb WILL run on netbsd now! << o hey!
mircea_popescu: <asciilifeform> incidentally the de-glibc-ized
trb WILL run on netbsd now! << o hey!
☟︎ assbot: Logged on 20-12-2015 22:01:59; asciilifeform: incidentally the de-glibc-ized
trb WILL run on netbsd now!
mod6: or simply just a manifest of tarballs/deps required for the one-button-push deployment of
trb assbot: Logged on 20-12-2015 00:17:11; asciilifeform: incidentally, gentlemen, please welcome (back) dulap! 46.166.165.30:8333 (nosuchlabs.com), a
trb node running bleedingedge-asciilifeform+rotor(musl)
mircea_popescu:
trb transactions will necessarily, always and everywhere be translatable to whatever shit-flavour-of-the-day "everyone" is using because "no reasonable objections".
ben_vulpes: a
trb node doing much of anything at all is pretty slow to respond to local api requests.