135 entries in 0.876s
[]bot: Bet placed: 2.999 BTC for No on "BTC network hashrate will exceed 1 E
xahash/s before 2015"
http://bitbet.us/bet/713/ Odds: 34(Y):66(N) by coin, 36(Y):64(N) by weight. Total bet: 18.66513193 BTC. Current weight: 50,003.
[]bot: Bet placed: 5 BTC for No on "BTC network hashrate will exceed 1 E
xahash/s before 2015"
http://bitbet.us/bet/713/ Odds: 40(Y):60(N) by coin, 41(Y):59(N) by weight. Total bet: 15.66613193 BTC. Current weight: 50,045.
assbot: BitBet - BTC network hashrate will exceed 1 E
xahash/s before 2015 :: 6.26 B (59%) on Yes, 4.4 B (41%) on No | closing in 5 months 5 days | weight: 50`595 (100`000 to 5`000)
[]bot: Bet placed: 3.9794 BTC for Yes on "BTC network hashrate will exceed 1 E
xahash/s before 2015"
http://bitbet.us/bet/713/ Odds: 59(Y):41(N) by coin, 54(Y):46(N) by weight. Total bet: 10.66613193 BTC. Current weight: 51,289.
assbot: BitBet - BTC network hashrate will exceed 1 E
xahash/s before 2015 :: 2.28 B (35%) on Yes, 4.29 B (65%) on No | closing in 5 months 4 weeks | weight: 57`534 (100`000 to 5`000)
gribble: e
xahash was last seen in #bitcoin-assets 1 year, 33 weeks, 6 days, 23 hours, 25 minutes, and 17 seconds ago: <e
xahash> !pl OBSI.HRPT 1@.1
assbot: I'm About as Good as Dead: the End of
Xah Lee
Neil: I wonder if we make 1 e
xahash/sec this year.
EskimoBob: e
xahash: he wasted the BTC on who know what. There is nothing left to bu a island ... LOL !
boonies4u: e
xahash: it was never a good neighborhood, you were just too preoccupied and complacent to notice how bad it was
smickles: e
xahash: no site an just a few users right now. Thanks for you input to my query :D
smickles: e
xahash: well, as that may be true, I think this solution would be better. The user would actually be making a decision about trusting my site based on wether or not they trust me rather than someone paid off the browser-maker and charged a fee, claiming to have fact-checked the site's owner
smickles: e
xahash: we'll see how it works out, i suppose, I shoud probably do a nice infographic instruction
smickles: e
xahash: i think you are correct there, i just want to present the informantion where by a user could trust the self-signed cert and know it was the correct on and not some kind of attacker
smickles: e
xahash: yeah, i'm saying i should be able to gpg clearsign something that assures it is the correct key-pair
smickles: e
xahash: that's what i'm talking about, but how would the user know it's the correct key-pair
Azelphur: e
xahash: I wasn't particularly expecting to get it baring in mind I'm unemployed and wanted a rewards card lol
nefario: e
xahash: ja, I wonder is he still buying these back?