8700+ entries in 0.021s
mod6: tmsr-os (cuntoo) will pick up where bsd leaves off.
mod6: (re: reading from the rs232, and now this, ya.)
mod6: i've honestly had a bitch of a time with it recently.
mod6: but yat chicken-egg is biting us here.
mod6: not a huge surprise, perhaps with all the right things in place (if that's even possible) and it "works" then one could build a real one from it's source.
mod6: /usr/lib/libc.so.77.0
mod6: # find /usr -name "libc.so*"
mod6: gnatmake: can't load library 'libc.so.56.0'
mod6: [17:32:00 mod6@obsd: ~/ada/fact]% gnatmake ffa ffa_fact
mod6: ok asciilifeform, dropped "OpenBSD64 4.8 binary" on my obsd 5.6. reason being, is that that version seems to be the only x86_64 version?? not sure there. but it /looks/ promising. after extracting the binaries, tried to use it to gnatmake fact + ffa, but was unsuccessful because:
mod6: <+asciilifeform> ( recall, you can't build gnat without gnat ) << yeah, was the reason i asked. hehe
mod6: asciilifeform: with dragonlace, are you testing with binaries or are you pulling from the src repo?
mod6: <+asciilifeform> i'm about to attempt openbsd gnat << sweet, let me know how it goes, i've got a obsd box.
mod6: <+mircea_popescu> what future fucking administration. << 'tis kinda true, with each successive one the twilight wanes.
mod6: im just lucky that the woodpeckers go after the trees as opposed to the structure, or i'd be spending a lot more time in the backyard like rambo
mod6: yeah they turn on dimes.
mod6: anyway, finned ballon follows pattern; you just learn to lead 'em
mod6: <+asciilifeform> aha, we discussed this << ya, cool idea
mod6: bitbet is back? thought that guy vaporized?
mod6: i suppose the only non-toxic way to get rid of the nearby mosquitoes is to buy up all the surrounding properties and then take a flame thrower to the lawns.
mod6: <+asciilifeform> removal of ddt was one of the original triumphs of rampant envirowhinery. << "it softens up the eagle eggs!!1"
mod6: omg send me ur scamcoinz for lambos and blunts!
mod6: never hurts, get the kinks out early
mod6: shinohai: yeah, been hot up here. horrid lately actually.
mod6: fun to read this stuff
mod6: damn these old logs.
mod6: there've been a bunch of threads on it in the logs.
mod6: ben_vulpes lays it out there eh?
mod6: <+mircea_popescu> that "abstract art" work we shall call the colors of factorial. << this sounds interesting
mod6: some proper anal right there
mod6: <+asciilifeform> exactly 65536 ascii lines << sweet
mod6: <+asciilifeform> mircea_popescu: bad noose : 9G << heh, ok pr0n dvd
mod6: thanks for the link.
mod6: im gonna re-run, see what it looks like second time.
mod6: the start of the number is 1D1CB6CEFC854C98FC338B0A2757950AE2F87 ...
☟︎☟︎ mod6: asciilifeform: real 313m41.727s
☟︎ mod6: i need to go to that pool party
mod6: CPU0: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E7500 @ 2.93GHz
mod6: asciilifeform: nice
mod6: <+asciilifeform> mod6: ram is 100% irrelevant here << not saying it isn't, trying to be more descriptive than "box". lol
mod6: <+mircea_popescu> BingoBoingo cuntoo, evidently. << i think this is a winner.
mod6: this box does nothing else other than just test builds/dev for trb, and is currently idle. should be a decent test. albiet much slower than the metrics collected with alf's i7 box.
mod6: <+asciilifeform> if it runs... << ok will try
mod6: see how long it takes? this is a core2duo (old box) with 4gb of ram
mod6: either way, think I should run the ffa_fact test?
mod6: never did, that always seems to work. can't figure out why it says "gcc: error: language ada not recognized"
mod6: fwiw, if i just run `gnatmake ffa_fact`, does not error.
mod6: <+phf> kind of reminds me of those personal homepages of schizophrenics back in the early days of the internets << scammers.
mod6: PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/gnat/bin; export PATH
mod6: and i already added: PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/gnat/bin to my ~/.bashrc
mod6: oh, weird, i installed everything to /usr/local/gnat
mod6: asciilifeform: also, what's weird is, despite the errors in the last paste above, an 'ffa_fact' binary is still compiled.
mod6: will grab alf's fact.tar.gz nao, and see if it works.
mod6: ok, so i dropped on a binary install of adacore onto my gentoo environment here just to test...
mod6: my apologies to anyone following along.
mod6: aha, ok. i get what you're sayin'
mod6: i guess i didn't realize that, i thought you just, ofc, need a working gcc.
mod6: (instead of just being a tar of just it's own source0
mod6: it actually distributes a ton of inner packages (requirements) like, gcc, gdb, zlib, etc etc.
mod6: im more referring to the massive tarball that you get from adacore
mod6: asciilifeform: yah, gentoo is looking for a package maintainer for gnat.
☟︎ mod6: <+asciilifeform> mod6: the official adacore gnat installs in 3minutes, but with obvious caveat (you live with binarolade) << yeah, i see they do have bins, but was going to custom handroll my own, to not only get one sanely built for my own environment, but will also allow me to set whatever ./configure flags I might need for optimizations.
mod6: well, like I was saying in #trilema-mod6 around that same day was, perhaps we're going to need to start freezing some of the things required to stand up a gcc4+gnat4 if it becomes required. i have a fear that this shit will start to disappear eventually.
mod6: my goal is to get gnat setup on gentoo, but the main problem is there, you have to hand-roll the entire thing because the gnat package for gentoo requires gcc6