log☇︎
63700+ entries in 0.045s
mircea_popescu: schmuck.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform honestly, having read this thing you linked i actually come to like the guy, whoever he is. why the fuck isn't he in the wot ? dja have a contact ?
mircea_popescu: not as they actually came.
mircea_popescu: email interoperation is from a time in the 2020s as they appeared to come in 1980s.
mircea_popescu: what are you, like from the future ?
mircea_popescu: ahahahaha
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform do you have any idea what yahoo mail penetration is among 3rd world whores ?
mircea_popescu: actually, i'm pretty sure it is.
mircea_popescu: rar/
mircea_popescu: "Since 2006, we’ve used the services of a third-party company to offer domain registration. That worked out really well for many years. Then, in 2014, that company was acquired by another, much larger, company. Its new parent owns a large number of other hosting companies that compete directly with us." <<< heh. i suspect it's exactly http://trilema.com/2014/namecheap-goes-off-the-deep-end-anyone-know-a-decent-domain-regist
mircea_popescu: http://btcbase.org/log/2017-10-03#1719943 << scarce consolation, so he yielded on btc so as to not yield on "must be in trilema" anyway ? ☝︎
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform wtf is a RAUS anyway ? ☟︎
mircea_popescu: that said, 50 cents a day is pretty lulz.
mircea_popescu: http://btcbase.org/log/2017-10-03#1719939 << pretty much 100% of present day "us tech" "industree" etc is built on bait and switch. ☝︎☟︎☟︎
mircea_popescu: iirc this was even broken on ro trilema at some ancient point, to usual chorus of "but what proof do you have this proof you have is proofing" and other theguardianisms. ☟︎
mircea_popescu: http://btcbase.org/log/2017-10-03#1719932 << pretty sure yahoo mail actually sells inbox access to spammers, message keywords and all. ☝︎☟︎
mircea_popescu: just omits a pipe separating the last two nils
mircea_popescu: lobbes didja get it ?
mircea_popescu: trinque add pipe between "cancelled at" and "rejected at" fields when nil ?
mircea_popescu: !!received-invoices
mircea_popescu: !!balance
mircea_popescu: !!v 5DAAA44B71955F14EB7E3934961B02394EC02C170B56BF1CDD23EE972D996F11
mircea_popescu: !!pay-invoice lobbes 1
mircea_popescu: !!received-invoices
mircea_popescu: oh. sorry.
mircea_popescu awed.
mircea_popescu: omfg it doesn't ?! just sheer concidence ?
mircea_popescu: phf that it only gives from the later parameter
mircea_popescu: http://deedbot.org/deed-487885-4.txt << is this supposed to be 404 trinque ?
mircea_popescu: diana_coman nah that's bash semantically meaningful
mircea_popescu: `ჯუღაშვილი lol
mircea_popescu: nothing wrong with having both `stalin and `cтaлин if anyone can be arsed with that.
mircea_popescu: `gossipdv3
mircea_popescu: but... `cr8 is cr or cr8 ?
mircea_popescu: this is convenient seeing how not having to terminate is a + imo
mircea_popescu: so then `ffa`-tronic not `ffa-tronic`
mircea_popescu: http://btcbase.org/log-search?q=from%3Aascii+from%3Amircea+hurr << also. ☟︎
mircea_popescu: speaking of which, phf can i have notfrom:x as well ?
mircea_popescu: i suppose the from:x is directly suited for this
mircea_popescu: what happens if rando starts loading up "your" concept with bs ?
mircea_popescu: what do we do to people who spam it ? and most importantly, how ?
mircea_popescu: but the former is strictly correct
mircea_popescu: so then is `ffa`-tronic or `ffa-tronic` ?
mircea_popescu: so i would say `ffa` ? or `ffa ?
mircea_popescu: seems that way dunnit.
mircea_popescu: !#s "<"
mircea_popescu: davout something i can type plox ty.
mircea_popescu: in fact, do we want it unterminated ?
mircea_popescu: ((())) ?
mircea_popescu: though that means fucking and.
mircea_popescu: & ?
mircea_popescu: !#s "$"
mircea_popescu: !#s "&"
mircea_popescu: http://btcbase.org/log/2017-10-01#1718993 << turns out noobs tend to paste it in ☝︎
mircea_popescu: holy hell.
mircea_popescu: !#s "@"
mircea_popescu: are we actually using @ ?
mircea_popescu: destroys the whole flow of typed text.
mircea_popescu: yeah, demanding anchors for our irc clients is tempting (i know many times i want to give my words as trilema refs directly, like say above cuban), but i suspect not so smart.
mircea_popescu: !!balance
mircea_popescu: but turn it as you will, auctorial adnotation is very hard to beat.
mircea_popescu: trinque amusingly hanbot was working on something in this vein
mircea_popescu: but it can'tself-standardize so everyone ends up with his own metasyntactic system
mircea_popescu: anyway, open for discussion, at least a while yet.
mircea_popescu: so then make space the @ ? this is stupid, space is alreadfy semantically loaded.
mircea_popescu: ben_vulpes yes, but if you do "ffa" you will get eg hoffa
mircea_popescu: and wtf, really, !#s p ?
mircea_popescu: http://btcbase.org/log-search?q=usg << not so. usg-tronic fails to appear.
mircea_popescu: searching for "@ffa" delivers @ffa-tronic, searching for ffa does not.
mircea_popescu: what if youi say ffa-tronic ?
mircea_popescu: how long can this last.
mircea_popescu: say @ffa instead of simply ffa so ppl can !#s "@ffa" and not get junk
mircea_popescu: at this rate we'll end up with metasyntactic. something like introduce @concept as a notation for concepts so they get indexed.
mircea_popescu: so what is the idea here, if i wish to review the state of this, other than asking you, i could also what ? !#s ffa ? ☟︎
mircea_popescu: but the correct form for this would be https://archive.is/http://wotpaste.cascadianhacker.com/pastes/$VAR$/?raw=true and where do they get that var ?
mircea_popescu: would be much better to have a working pullable infrastructure for your item, than to say this thing can't be pulled
mircea_popescu: she has a legitimate problem though -- interested parties can't follow the matter in their own time. it's currently push not pull, which is always a bad idea.
mircea_popescu: which is i suppose the moral little girls learn out of watchingt the trade press : your future is as a whore ; will be paid TO LEAVE.
mircea_popescu: myea
mircea_popescu: devil himself knows not the mind of man.
mircea_popescu: such wow.
mircea_popescu: o, speaking of "women in tech" : after thoroughly wrecking yahoo (eerily reminiscent of carly fiorina's "performance" at meanwhile disappeared compaq/hp), melissa meyer disappeared from view ; leaving verizon to pick up teh pieces. ☟︎
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform this is a terrible answer.
mircea_popescu: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CXJ8uPRqFf0 << for completeness.
mircea_popescu: BingoBoingo no i know, hence my comments.
mircea_popescu: so... i guess i'm confused.
mircea_popescu: branson himself doesn't wanna be rich, as proven by the fact that whenever he almost gets rich, he blows it away.
mircea_popescu: stephane gautronneau doesn't wanna be rich, he just wants to hang out with denni, except impersonally.
mircea_popescu: so now. what impact does any of this have on ... on who exactly ? denni dun wanna be rich, she wants to have fun.
mircea_popescu: plenty of these all around.
mircea_popescu: his contribution to this world is "it's easy to make a small fortune in whatever -- start with a big one".
mircea_popescu: moreover -- branson is exactly another version of socialist state - krysha'd pseudo-entrepreneur, exactly like http://trilema.com/2014/lets-do-mark-cuban/
mircea_popescu: ty!
mircea_popescu: eh wtf's his name, the one who sold some sports entertaining thing to yahoo and has been posturing as "entrepreneur" ever since.
mircea_popescu: moreover -- branson is exactly another version of socialist state - krysha'd pseudo-entrepreneur, exactly like
mircea_popescu: except the photog is not rich. well, not monetarily, anyway.
mircea_popescu: and self-same boyfriend proposed that prop #1 (his gf, with the tits) sit so and so with prop #2 (his client, with the gray hair) so HIS picture comes out good. which it did.
mircea_popescu: sadly the story behind that is that denni parkinson was there with HER BOYFRIEND, who's some photog there to shoot some bs about branson's hobby (some kind of new and improved surfing) ☟︎
mircea_popescu: superficially, the dude is doing it right.
mircea_popescu: it's very problematic, all this. consider the (correctly labeled!) illustration of branson : https://elaineou.files.wordpress.com/2014/11/denni-parkinson-nude-richard-branson-island-2050764615.jpg