37000+ entries in 0.374s

gribble: Error: invalid syntax (
<string>, line 1)
gribble: Error: invalid syntax (
<string>, line 1)
BingoBoingo:
<asciilifeform> i have nfi why a usg organ in good standing needs 'attack'
<< Innocence washing
BingoBoingo:
<danielpbarron> BingoBoingo, what gossip?
<< The signed recollection by minimally collected guy.
phf: bordeaux-threads stopped building with my asdf1, i checked, someone hardcoded >3.11 check, with ~no purpose for it~. next thing i know i read "
<jackdaniel> [04:44:30] but don't use clim's mp, I've reimplemented it on top of bordeaux-thread just for backward compatibility" on #clim
BingoBoingo:
<phf> i think crystal whatever is particularly nasty take on autoconf, probably one of the best examples in support of asciilifeform's rants.
<< Nah, "Monero" is far worse because of what it supposes to be.
BingoBoingo:
<mircea_popescu> ok, but i mean... so we drive nails with screwdriver because that's what we got.
<< In that case skip nail and drive in screwdriver. Better load bearing ability, usually...
BingoBoingo: * asciilifeform brb, alcohol
<< AHA, S.MG is driving alf closer to rehab!
a111: Logged on 2016-08-22 00:23 asciilifeform:
http://btcbase.org/log/2016-08-20#1526079 << i watched thread and wondered how long an (allegedly) cunt-enabled ninjashogun would last in the field, vs a conventional one. seems like we have an answer.
BingoBoingo:
<danielpbarron> why do people go to the trouble of making burn addresses that have valid checksums if such a thing isn't enforced by consensus rules?
<< Because you can either make baby or you can make baby but feed girl levaqin while baby is baking.
mircea_popescu: * umoguny has quit
<< lol why is this shit so hard seriously nao.
BingoBoingo:
<thestringpuller> So scrubs resort to dirty ass butane they can get from like home depot.
<< What they don't carry CO2 at your home depot? You live in the Capital of Home Depot!
danielpbarron: "Bitcoin doesn't enforce checksums at the protocol level either."
<< is this true? A block that includes a transaction which spends to an address with an invalid checksum can be considered valid?
shinohai: Just noticed I had used the
<a> tags, replaced with BBcode nau
gribble: jurov was last seen in #trilema 1 day, 1 hour, 32 minutes, and 44 seconds ago:
<jurov> so far not, but i will turn it off if something arises that needs nontrivial fix
mircea_popescu: ;;later tell bingoboingo "Following the news of a serious RNG bug affecting all GPG versions a low energy shitgnome campaign of apologetics and "not that bad" followed."
<< can i get a "The fact that hundreds of GPG keys have been Phuctored in the past year has, of course, nothing to do with all this." added ?
mircea_popescu: "On Thursday following their acquisition by Univision, Gawker media announced that their former flagship Gawker.com would be shuttered next week."
<< lol. "all the 'jouralists' have been reclassified as actresses (which is what they always hoped for anyway), playing ugly betty in the 194 unilever sitcoms currently under production. this translates to a 85% pay increase across the board, and their spoken lines will be drastica
mod6:
<+phf> asciilifeform: i did, he said something about "this being work in progress and don't want to commit" or somesuch
<< i could regrind them, yeah. ideally, each who want to use these unexamined items should do so on their own accord, placing them in their patches directory as a "WILD" patch. Until the day when the foundation moves forward and folds them in after examination and testing.
☟︎ mod6: pposed to replace it
<+phf> instead. obviously this doesn't make for pretty graphs, so i don't upload it
<< yup. there's a planned vpatch for this. bunch of discussions. just been focusing my attention on trb build stuff lately.
mod6:
<+phf> there's periodically things that claim to be vpatches, but they don't have genesis. i think a notable example of that is v.pl, which has been published as v.pl, and then followed up by vpatches that are supposed to superseded each other rather than form a chain. generally i've seen that pattern a lot, people publish something, than publish a second vpatch, that doesn't build on previous vpatch, but su
mod6:
<+mircea_popescu> so if i want to publish a vpatch today, how do i go about it ?
<+jurov> ofc you can send it to mailing list. and to phf via deedbot, and maybe some other places i dunno?
<< i always just send mine to the ml
mod6:
<+diana_coman> hi mod6 how's that eulora-box thing going? :D
<< hi!! it's not going exactly yet. been kinda caught up. i need to get a box for that. will do, soonish.