log☇︎
3225 entries in 0.885s
pete_dushenski: also working on belated hearn eulogy and trb history part ii this week.
mod6: deedbot running trb?
assbot: Logged on 18-01-2016 15:15:10; mod6: Attention TRB Testers: If you want to help test, please take the time to build trb via trinque's makefiles here; http://therealbitcoin.org/ml/btc-dev/2016-January/000190.html (Should be basically getting & verifing the tar ball; plus setting up a ~/.wot dir with keys for V to use) -- then a `make` in the directory. Please report your findings. Thanks.
ascii_butugychag: in EXACTLY same way as my trb node does THE SAME amount of number crunching whether it hears a block from gavin's node or from mircea_popescu's.
mod6: Attention TRB Testers: If you want to help test, please take the time to build trb via trinque's makefiles here; http://therealbitcoin.org/ml/btc-dev/2016-January/000190.html (Should be basically getting & verifing the tar ball; plus setting up a ~/.wot dir with keys for V to use) -- then a `make` in the directory. Please report your findings. Thanks. ☟︎☟︎
guruvan: asciilifeform: working on a trb docker image - looks like was 168000 p2sh ?
punkman: does trb relay txs with op_return outputs?
PeterL: oh, wait, is that the same one linked on trb website?
PeterL: just trying to follow directions on trb website
PeterL: maybe somebody could help, I'm trying to build trb, http://wotpaste.cascadianhacker.com/pastes/6d055000-a895-4b6a-b4bf-af7f360db3b7/?raw=true
ascii_butugychag: (has anybody built the thing with clang? i wouldn't use such a trb in the field, but it would be handy for scientific - code coverage, flow graph, etc. purposes)
PeterL: hi, trying to build trb, anybody want to help me figure out what is wrong? http://wotpaste.cascadianhacker.com/pastes/d0592532-07b7-468e-a913-988919c58f5b/
ascii_butugychag: but it does mean that a trb node is largely useless until fully synced.
ascii_butugychag: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=15-01-2016#1371072 << this is probably not surprising to anyone who's been paying attention, but a trb node that isn't up to current height won't relay any tx that involves blocks not yet seen ☝︎
pete_dushenski: in other nyooz, 5 trb v99999 nodez !, https://bitnodes.21.co/nodes/?q=/therealbitcoin.org:0.9.99.99
trinque: by god, sometime this month it might even have a fully synced trb to poke too
ascii_butugychag: on account of the faux-trb 'bitcoin classic' crapolade
thestringpuller: the funny thing is the core devs proclaim "No need to use V or TRB method. We sign our git patches!!!!111"
assbot: An historical timeline of The Real Bitcoin (TRB) development, part i. | Contravex: A blog by Pete Dushenski ... ( http://bit.ly/1Ok6H8T )
PeterL: also read this: http://www.contravex.com/2015/12/25/an-historical-timeline-of-the-real-bitcoin-trb-development-part-i/
Atomicat: V? What's the difference between Bitcoin Core and TRB? Does it use the same blockchain?
Atomicat: I will look into this later today. What are the rules set forth in TRB?
mircea_popescu: PeterL this is a public channel. for obvious security reasons trb is a superset thereof.
PeterL: as far as we know, we are the only people using trb?
PeterL: #b-a mining pool implies it is run by people within the #b-a WoT, trb pool implies it follows the rules set forth in trb
PeterL: although, somebody outside this group could pick up trb and start their own pool, so I guess it is not exactly the same thing
PeterL: #b-a is this group, which is where trb is developed
PeterL: iiuc, the current reference implementation of trb does not support pooled mining, so somebody would have to port the current trb ruleset into a mining pool program
PeterL: Atomicat, it would be a mining pool run using the same rule as TRB (the real bitcoin)
Atomicat: PeterL: What is a TRB mining pool?
PeterL: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com//?date=12-01-2016#1367133 << we don't need any hash power to make TRB mining pool, miners bring the has power, we tell them what to mine ☝︎
BingoBoingo: trb behaving as expected so far, no forgetten gold in the wallet.dat yet
asciilifeform: rather than adding talmudistry to trb
mod6: after this, you should be able to press out a new trb that includes the latest patches, then build from there.
BingoBoingo also spied cheap dedi box on clearance will set up trb node on linux when datacenter gets back to me about paying them.
ascii_butugychag: betcha the pool would instantly fill with trb folk
mircea_popescu: iirc mod6 was considering a trb patch
shinohai needs to review last night's logs for more info on trb mining pool possibility
mircea_popescu: anyway. this bullshit won't be either mined or relayed by trb.
asciilifeform is watching the scrolling logs from his trb nodez, it is like music, so smooth
asciilifeform: ;;later tell BingoBoingo it is not an accurate description of malleus patch to say that it only nukes peers using bloom filters. it nukes any peer which issues any command whatsoever unsupported in trb.
asciilifeform: ~considerably~ smoother performance on the trb+malleus nodez
thestringpuller: ascii_butugychag ben_vulpes mod6 : is there a way to look at what data messages/control messages are going over the wire or force their invocation in trb? or would that functionality need to be patched in to print to log/accept command from some source?
mircea_popescu: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=11-01-2016#1366063 <<< certainly. which is why trb nodes are not all advertised, and we're eagerly awaiting seeing this "pure coincidence". ☝︎
BingoBoingo: And Glibc DNS functions force dynamic linking which is why excised from trb
ben_vulpes: if it continues to fail to compile trb i may embark on gentoo quest instead.
ben_vulpes: trb compiled just dandily on the ubuntu i had on the box previously
asciilifeform: ben_vulpes: i have an openbsd box here but it will not build trb, not enough ram (+swap even)
BingoBoingo: asciilifeform: I have a linux trb, but I keep sideshow because inertia and curiosity.
asciilifeform: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=11-01-2016#1365915 << remind me again why you have a sideshow thing and not trb ☝︎
ben_vulpes: 'linker file input unused because linking not done' << anyone ever see this while compiling trb on open bsd?
thestringpuller: asciilifeform: trb compilation detects machine architecture when building right? so build on machine run on same machine. or do I have to configure some flag for the machine I'm compiling + running on?
mircea_popescu: i would strongly advise anyone using trb in production to at least test this patch.
asciilifeform: (iso that booted to trb)
assbot: Logged on 11-01-2016 01:32:44; mircea_popescu: i recall hav ing a 32 bit trb made to work at some point, but not the specifics
asciilifeform: generally you will see this in trb if you built for $machine but you have $othermachine.
trinque: propose a better way to get a large number of trb nodes in the wild
assbot: Logged on 11-01-2016 01:32:44; mircea_popescu: i recall hav ing a 32 bit trb made to work at some point, but not the specifics
mircea_popescu: i recall hav ing a 32 bit trb made to work at some point, but not the specifics ☟︎☟︎
mircea_popescu: or did you make the os 32 and trb 64 ?
ben_vulpes: only figured this out when i went to compile trb and got assembly errors.
ben_vulpes: while compiling trb either on various linux or an openbsd?
mircea_popescu: adlai if you can code, you can actually help the trb people. if you can't code, you can try an' help BingoBoingo, who's coinstantly asking. or else offend copypaste by rewriting trilema as best you can. or etc.
mircea_popescu: what they like it for - to save in, as per http://trilema.com/2014/la-florida-and-other-places/#selection-109.0-109.542 - is readily satisfied by trb as it is.
asciilifeform: that there is not a trb path between my nodez and the miners.
mircea_popescu: it should also not be the case that there isn't a trb path between you and miners.
shinohai: Guess I'll have to compile trb on tinkerbell linux now
mircea_popescu: miner defection from any and all non-trb approved soft forks is a ~GUARANTEE~ in the future. just a question of when.
thestringpuller: imo this is why TRB Foundation is so important. it not only decrufts the shitty code but acts as defenders of the blockchain
thestringpuller: this is fine as long as my future trb node can witness transactions being confirmed that it broadcasted.
shinohai: And so trb is at a crossroads :/
mircea_popescu: sooo... acthung panzers, asciilifeform ben_vulpes mod6 : it is certain beyond any conceivable doubt the trb nodes are isolated - both the publicly advertised ones and at least one not publicly advertised, because lo! what used to be tx e6b8aa9dedef74a7e8961e0d997aebc35aae3c8e762a715336d84b39507c9773 has not only been successfully broadcast but it got malleated, and is now included in the chain as c29e162c79144ced3e827
mircea_popescu: punkman mno. that is an unrelated issue of a 2nd tx. again, it's not surprising, seeing how trb handles chains.
mircea_popescu: punkman we know for a fact everyone in trb DOES have it in their mempool, actually.
mircea_popescu: mno, they accepted one and rejected the rest (which is unsurprising for trb, seeing how the rest were chained on the one)
punkman: mircea_popescu: i've been broadcasting it all night to the trb nodes, you can ask any of them, they should still have it in the memory. << they seem to be rejecting it, so maybe pastebin the raw transaction
massiro: mircea_popescu, sorry, i'm not familiar with trb nodes.
mircea_popescu: i've been broadcasting it all night to the trb nodes, you can ask any of them, they should still have it in the memory.
asciilifeform: ;;later tell mircea_popescu understand that, for while there are only a few trb nodes, and everyone knows where they are, it is entirely conceivable for traffic to be diddled in arbitrary ways in real time
assbot: Logged on 09-01-2016 03:08:08; mircea_popescu: so basically, my node sent to trb nodes, trb nodes have it in memory but it's not being broadcast past them.
mircea_popescu: so basically, my node sent to trb nodes, trb nodes have it in memory but it's not being broadcast past them. ☟︎
mod6: was 83e2b80e96919cb0b0186ff8ba7225d25535ad722ec5e2343a3a5927ef85d735 sent by trb?
mircea_popescu doesn't know what to think atm, maybe it's some weirdo bug in the trb ? maybe what the shit.
mircea_popescu: hey asciilifeform are the trb nodes isolated atm ?!
mod6: trinque: I pulled, verified and tested 'trb-mk.tar.gz' on my gentoo x86-64 machine. It built a static bitcoind for me! I fired it up, connects, pulls blocks. =]
asciilifeform: i generally go to ml when i look for 'what happened in xxx month trb-wise'
trinque: http://deedbot.org/trb-mk.tar.gz http://deedbot.org/trb-mk.tar.gz.asc << mod6, asciilifeform, ben_vulpes, et al., this thing has crapped a working trb enough times to get feedback. It's a set of makefiles for the former build script and rotor. There are interesting knobs in the various makefiles, including (I think) an easy way to put other builders alongside rotor (as asciilifeform mentioned). Lemme
pete_dushenski: mircea_popescu: lol. "it will please you to know that ibm laptop suspends to disk without issue with ubuntu 10.04" != "girl says it actually compiled trb. SO THERE."
asciilifeform: anyway 'compile trb' was never a mega-feat
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform girl says it actually compiled trb. SO THERE.
shinohai: Indeed. When I haz enough forum rank I'll even make a trb signature xD
shinohai: No official trb thread on bitcointalk, all this XT, bigger blocks, and segwit nonsense there too. :/
shinohai: 4329 blocks to go. I might have an actual trb node by next week.
asciilifeform: and for that matter, trb.
asciilifeform: (on all 3 trb nodes under my flag)
pete_dushenski: reliant robin is an excellent example of bitcoin as it works today : looks to have the right parts but has them in the wrong order and as a result it doesn't quite work as intended. compare this with the morgan 3-wheeler, which is perhaps where trb is headed, which has the same parts, but not welded together by apes.
ascii_butugychag: on trb - yes!
BingoBoingo: trb and others pre-power rangers derping on the matter sign whatever s value
jurov: O.o restarted my patched trb after 2 weeks, now it reliably sigsegvs after first few blocks: http://dpaste.com/2C1FAER
assbot: Logged on 06-01-2016 01:27:22; asciilifeform: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=05-01-2016#1361049 << is this where we learn that nobody's mining off trb ?