19100+ entries in 0.171s
mod6: I think it's fine, we can ratify / ammend it
as needed I suppose.
mircea_popescu: once you found the misspelling you found it and ere you found it the text was just
as correctly spelled
as it will be after you find it : "
as far
as i know, correctly spelled"
shinohai: Often misdiagnosed
as Crohn's disease iirc
lobbes: aka, I get the same output
as both of PeterL's runs
mircea_popescu:
as per that ancient "doctor, is it bad if i hear voices ?" "only if you start answering."
BingoBoingo: <mircea_popescu> is the "i just wanted to" right opposed at the "i just wanted to left" removal
as being too radical ? after all, they DO "just want to" undisturbed ? or what ? << It seems like there is a mass of confusion in them.
mod6:
as it stands, at the moment, sounds like a mechanical push. with the ability to set the length to some power of two. i'd say it's a bit harder to follow, code-wise, with the recursive calls perhaps.
mircea_popescu: is the "i just wanted to" right opposed at the "i just wanted to left" removal
as being too radical ? after all, they DO "just want to" undisturbed ? or what ?
mircea_popescu: and of course
as women are the social scar tissue, this is going to end up with yet another "oh, it's THEIR fault!!!", like every historical case to date.
☟︎ mircea_popescu: tru fact : you can take down satellites TODAY.
as an individual effort.
a111: Logged on 2017-08-14 17:08 mircea_popescu: it's funny how all the things are the same thing and everything wraps into ideological identity. empire needs... a lot of really dumb ones,
as a COLLECTIVE. we... make every one stand on its own INDIVIDUALLY.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform it means there's no space for choosing,
as there's an obvious right thing.
PeterL: (I was using 4160 bits
as the limit)
mircea_popescu: it's funny how all the things are the same thing and everything wraps into ideological identity. empire needs... a lot of really dumb ones,
as a COLLECTIVE. we... make every one stand on its own INDIVIDUALLY.
☟︎ mircea_popescu: and now the idea is... since this could ALSO be used
as a padder (in the rsa sense), a reverser is needed (takes r and s and spits out m)
phf: so this possibly invalidates my original thesis of "wreckers in sbcl!11" i just haven't spent
as much time there
as i have under other implementations
mircea_popescu: we laugh a lot, right, and half the time a gekko joins in,
as if he got the joke. "ka-ka-ka-kaka"
mircea_popescu: helicopter notoriously vulnerable to small arsm fire.
as per log discussion
mircea_popescu: anyway. his ro "diortosire" is a very well illuminated source,
as to the original material, and if one speaks ro one benefits from reading it even if one can also read the septuagint in original.
mircea_popescu: ben_vulpes the substantial weakness segwit adds to bitcoin chain security is that witout it, one needs the power to unwind the chain AND the keys of old txn to steal bitcoin. whereas with it, one only needs the hash power,
as anyone can spend the segwit shit.
☟︎☟︎ mircea_popescu: ben_vulpes and block depth. if you make segwit tx a to me at height 1 and i put it into a normal tx at block 2, i can spend it from block 3
as my bitcoin, the segwitnmess is gone out of it. to steal it from me, one has to rewind all the way to block 1 again. which is possible, but expensive
as the chain builds.
☟︎ ben_vulpes: trinque: i wouldn't go so far
as to say they pulled it off
ben_vulpes: while i'm on the topic, can confirm that 'modern' asdf is all sorts of royal pita
as well, although that thread has been well hashed in the logs
mircea_popescu: basically, a high energy xray will lose 2/3 of its energy every dozen or so meters. whatever's left illuminates the gold (there's no crossing gold, too large barn), and then gets sent back,
as gold-xray-pink
a111: Logged on 2017-08-10 21:46 edivad: in the case of segwit, this means that trb won't care about segwit blocks and
as long
as they will complies with the "hard rules" (I really don't know how to explain myself better) they will be accepted?
shinohai: Also, from here onwards you should refer to Segwit
as `Segshit`
trinque:
as currently derped, yep, "segwit" shouldn't mean a damn thing to bitcoin proper.
edivad: in the case of segwit, this means that trb won't care about segwit blocks and
as long
as they will complies with the "hard rules" (I really don't know how to explain myself better) they will be accepted?
☟︎ mircea_popescu: the bitch with any such approach,
as i realised last night. there is NO WAY to protect yourself from downstream cache. no way.
edivad: it's pretty much already modded
as you have told
mircea_popescu:
http://btcbase.org/log/2017-08-10#1696685 << it's cheap in the sense making your shoes by hand is cheap. it can be fun, but that's
as far
as it goes. leaving aside problems of how much a pair of aluminum, ruby or w/e dice cost (ie, GOOD dice), a throw provides you with a few bit's worth, FG spits out kB's worth per second. on a per-entropy-bit cost, figuring in capital goods, salary for the thrower, etcetera, FG is about 5 de
☝︎ mod6: my V doesn't use diff anyway, only patch, gpg, sha512sum, and wget -- and otherwise just standard shell tools such
as echo, mkdir, rm, cat, etc.
PeterL: oh, and I was trying to make the functions more general, avoid putting in magic numbers
as much
as possible
a111: Logged on 2016-08-18 12:32 mircea_popescu: asciilifeform since we're on this btw, the way i want tmsr-rsa key generation to work is
as follows : a contains a number of entropy bytes specified by user in tmsr-rsa.conf read whenever tmsr-rsa.conf specifies (such
as urandom); b contains a base-tmsr string specified by user. c = base-tmsr(a).b ; p = nextprime(cut(sha512(c),257)) ; process is repeated for q = nextprime (cut(sha512(c'),258));
mircea_popescu: crc checks that the string is the same now
as it was when crc was originalyl computed
mircea_popescu: PeterL is there any security contemplated for the data, such
as i dunno, encrypt the lists of peers / keys / history etc ? or simply a case of "fuck you secure your machine" ?
mircea_popescu: yes, but it ruins the security of the scheme,
as i don't expect you will be sending pings to ips associated with bogus keys ?
PeterL: well, it is not unpadded, it uses the random byte string
as the pad
PeterL: I just put in the crc32
as a checksum
mircea_popescu: such
as : epochal switch on cuba! it... didn't survive his term.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform yes ? though it was israeli iirc, and worked irl abou
as well
as the recently reported stink bombs.
mircea_popescu: not to mention, of course, that everyone in the area can also hear it, there's nothing mysterious about it. yes there are ways to carry sound over inaudible ultrasound
as a modulation, but guess what ? that takes even more energy! a lot more, in fact.
mircea_popescu: of course, the acoustic energy saturation dampens with distance (by the cube) and with obstacles. the jet needs something to the tune of 100 MW to take off, and all this buys you at close range and in open air is bleeding from the ears, not magical symptoms such
as bruises, concussions or other mysteries.
mircea_popescu: for the record : a decibel is the log10 of the ratio between a measured sound energy density and 10^-12 J/m^3. consequently the energy of sound at 150 decibels (such
as the sonic blast of a jet taking off at 25m, capable of rupturing eardrums) corresponds to an energy density of 10 ^ (150/10) * 10 ^ -12 = 1000 J/m^3.
a111: Logged on 2017-07-24 17:53 mircea_popescu: "Oakley is among a growing number of educators who view intermediate algebra
as an obstacle to students obtaining their credentials — particularly in fields that require no higher level math skills." << teh confusion of ideas ffs.
mircea_popescu: no but you write it
as a full matrix, you get the undo for free
mircea_popescu: but you serialize and do a whole word's worth of bit diddle
as a xor
a111: Logged on 2017-08-09 15:58 mircea_popescu: anyway, let it be said that there's nothing wrong with oaep
as far
as we know, but for the sake of argument a mpfhf based padding scheme would conceivably work like this : 1. given message m, of length l, generate r = random bits, of length l' up to l but not less than 256 bits. 2. compose m' = r + m + c (in that order), where c is l - l` (and its bitness is always same
as the bitness of len(m')-256). 3. compose Pm = R + S +
mircea_popescu: reversing MPFHF is not required for the above quoted version,
as the fhf is used there
as a hash function not
as a padder. (and alf's objection is valid, not a very good option, a settable size output sponge would be much better).
a111: Logged on 2017-08-09 22:09 mircea_popescu: to encrypt : take plaintext message M, no longer than 250 bytes, and zero-pad it to 250 bytes. take pile of random bits R 250 bytes long. calculate X = M xor R. calculate Y = R xor MPFHF(X) set for R.len = 250 bytes. RSA the 500 byte pile of X || Y. done. to decrypt : de-RSA the 500 byte pile. cut it in two halves. calculate R = Y xor X. calculate M
as X xor R. done.
a111: Logged on 2017-08-09 23:00 mircea_popescu: the herd is lazy, the aparatchicks are scared, and the intelligent are lost in the soup, interacting with cattle and criminals
as if they were people.
mircea_popescu: the herd is lazy, the aparatchicks are scared, and the intelligent are lost in the soup, interacting with cattle and criminals
as if they were people.
☟︎ mircea_popescu: nobody knows what the fuck "sha 2017" is. nobody cares. even the people paid to fucking care stopped giving a shit in the 90s,
as that nsa goon at "crypto conferences" piece amply attests.
mircea_popescu: to encrypt : take plaintext message M, no longer than 250 bytes, and zero-pad it to 250 bytes. take pile of random bits R 250 bytes long. calculate X = M xor R. calculate Y = R xor MPFHF(X) set for R.len = 250 bytes. RSA the 500 byte pile of X || Y. done. to decrypt : de-RSA the 500 byte pile. cut it in two halves. calculate R = Y xor X. calculate M
as X xor R. done.
☟︎