62600+ entries in 0.025s
mircea_popescu: in other lulz, wikipedia : "Erik Naggum (June 13, 1965 – June 17, 2009) was a Norwegian computer programmer recognized for his work in the fields of SGML, Emacs and Lisp. Since the early 1990s he was also a provocative participant on various Usenet discussion groups.[1]" << accidental hit of the consensus process, because "provocative" seemed both sufficiently insulting to the idiots and actually flattering to the fanbois.
mircea_popescu: and if it gets cut, the logparser sure as fuck has no way to fix it now.
mircea_popescu: because if i don't have the liberty to overload an url i can find no incentive to ever tickmark.
mircea_popescu: experience convinces me that anchor-first is correct way and the url-first html spec a kludge./
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform how logotrons use this raw info is left to operator tbh.
mircea_popescu: reason i prefer the `tag:url format to the `tag url format is that space is too syntactically meaningful.
mircea_popescu: it never has to be done again whether done by ":" or by " " lol
mircea_popescu: how is this cleanner ? same thing, but instead of : you used space.
mircea_popescu: logotron can parse them into sense, at a further cost.
mircea_popescu: gets point of reference baked in into tags ; gives me an incentive to even tagmark in the first place.
mircea_popescu: evolvospec, for the record, is not a spec, exactly in the manner a bad girl may be great fun to be with but notrly a wife.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform maybe we can push a year 0 on the misfortunate kind hearts trying to follow this evolvospec.
mircea_popescu: somehow he manages to need much much less hammer to hammer in a point, for which i confess to admiring the man.
mircea_popescu: however, as a chat anchoring convention i could actually get myself to do it, as that's 99% of what i wish i could do and currently can't, frustrates me once a week with some regularity.
mircea_popescu: i confess i tried to introduce `tickmarks into my process as such, but it ends up ~looking~ fucking retarded. i'm not even know if it just looks that way but isn't, or actually is. huge inertia against it though.
☟︎ mircea_popescu: sooo... just had a lightning so close, made the landline phone ring.
mircea_popescu: sadly, nobody had the foresight to fuck them with a spiked pole then.
mircea_popescu: i expect you just get one mult for the largest size and reuse it indefinitely, nfi what he's on about with the 2n luts for every sum
☟︎ mircea_popescu: aha. and even after it was invented and before it was published.
mircea_popescu: i know no proof of r-m convergence in terms of factorization.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform convergence on it is much narrower than mn tries or w/e a week provides.
mircea_popescu: apeloyee the p/np thing is kinda the label used here for all these, zfc, gnfs, etc.
mircea_popescu: if your expectation is that the fifth attempt did not resolve the problem in a manner such as the fifth million would, there's deeper problems.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform but the test that takes longer and costs more does not consist of manic re-measuring of the same one length, repeated millions of times.
mircea_popescu: "not a root of 1st degree polynomial with smaller parameters than it"
mircea_popescu: this incidentally is a fine statement of what a prime even fucking is.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform yes but this is just the artistic side in you.
mircea_popescu: as per the ancient "doctor, random things in the house are talking to me, am i losing it ?" "have you started answering ?" "not yet" "then not yet"
mircea_popescu: well, the running maybe not, but ~believing~ that it achieved something, surely.
mircea_popescu: apeloyee wasn't it exactly r-m restricted to first 10 primes or such ?
mircea_popescu: (and ftr -- aleph (carmichael numbers) = aleph(N) iirc.)
mircea_popescu: 2887148238050771212671429597130393991977609459279722700926516024197432303799152733116328983144639225941977803110929349655578418949441740933805615113979999421542416933972905423711002751042080134966731755152859226962916775325475044445856101949404200039904432116776619949629539250452698719329070373564032273701278453899126120309244841494728976885406024976768122077071687938121709811322297802059565867 for permanent record.
mircea_popescu: famously, maple misidentified the guy's number. not because of rng, eiher.
mircea_popescu: but we don't have to start low. and we don't really want to, either.
mircea_popescu: it naturally makes assumptions about the item you're testing.
mircea_popescu: the true problem here is that there's not going to be a fixtime r-m
mircea_popescu: apeloyee no, because as he well points out, the time it takes is not unrelated to the key.
mircea_popescu: so this is more a r-m problem altogether. as that's not linear.