3800+ entries in 0.022s
Framedragger: wtf people, yes java / c# syntax is not great, but srsly now. your aesthetic sensitivities
Framedragger unfortunately has to run, which has the side effect of delaying wrath inflicted by mp
Framedragger: tell me that at least it's not the syntax that you hate.
Framedragger: what don't you like about this bunch of stuff you posted? :)
Framedragger: unless latest unity is really broken and all-too-usg, in which case, okay :(
Framedragger: (not really complex, tho. but you get moving *fast*)
Framedragger: you can build complex shit fast there. that's a thing.
Framedragger: mircea_popescu: no repl but it's very easy to get things going in unity. though i found it to be clunky in the sense of not being able to contain simple project in one's head, as you have to look at parameters around the IDE/project as well as source code (parts of which are 'attached' to objects). but it's very usable.
Framedragger: ah, i see kk re. ctypes vs the older interface..
Framedragger: phf: given this, would you even say that what pycrypto does is evil, i wonder.. i mean if it uses ctypes ~properly
Framedragger: BingoBoingo: it's a single php file, relatively elegant i'd say. the logic is in redirect() (line 212 on v1.07 of plugin) if you want to verify lack of satan. seems ~relatively harmless but i no wp plugin masta
Framedragger: not saying that it's amazing or anything, wp eww
Framedragger: i don't know if redirection plugin does that. if you mean that a plugin would add a new line to htaccess then yeah that's retarded. don't think that's how it works
Framedragger: there's a wp plugin but maybe policy against such works of satan
Framedragger: aha, but you assume that python timers are anything but inaccurate :p (but yesyes..)
Framedragger: (branch prediction side channels etc, dunno how feasible in the context of application using pycrypto..)
☟︎ Framedragger: there are some reasons for it i suppose? avoid timing side channels etc
Framedragger: IV length unchecked when allocating memory for IV, amazing.......
Framedragger: mircea_popescu: noted, re. notion of 'competition'.
Framedragger: it seems that tor main folx were banned from presenting at CCC this year (it's tradition that they normally do it every year), allegedly due to the appelbaum debacle..
Framedragger: i guess one may have a database of keys, as well as a table of signed-with-key nicknames which establish someone claiming a nickname for key? sort of gns. alternative scheme is to have any kind of aliasing be local, as per gossipd. less convenient for things like looking up nickname in wot.deedbot.org of course.
Framedragger: thanks for clarifying... so then it's just the same key. and things like 'IP of this key' really is a separate matter. (it was put into gpg user field as a matter of convenience of course.) should have been obvious...
Framedragger: right.. "it's the same person, for our purposes."
Framedragger: with regards to keyserver, my use of them makes me biased in the sense of thinking of keys as necessarily having user IDs in them. "key has some particular holder". not really the case i guess :)
Framedragger: but you're right, i suppose i have ornithology in mind here, which is not relevant. that's a separate thing, really. it's exactly an observation which shows an association (key <-> holder at some point in time).
Framedragger: contexts inevitably switched when 'fingerprinting scheme' discussion enters
Framedragger: original query re permalinks for WoT keys was a practical use case of being able to point someone to a key in WoT
Framedragger: (so i don't know. maybe 'keyholder' is really not a property of a key. which i guess it isn't; so maybe i'm just generating noise)
Framedragger: all this while acknowledging that if you have same N, you have, *for practical purposes*, same key. but maybe i've messed it up in my head.
Framedragger: if fingerprint == N, it cannot distinguish between different referents, so to speak
Framedragger: well. for one, it's nice if you can distinguish between different keyholders, no? in the particular case of ssh-rsa keys, "which ip used this key?"
Framedragger: but then again, perhaps in tmsr-semantics, it *is* the same key :)
Framedragger: iirc 'user' field was needed as multiple different keys belonging to different users may have same N
Framedragger: (one more note, even if alf or sb protests use of particular hashing func for fingerprint scheme, the fact of the matter is that one does kind of require for a universal fingerprinting scheme to exist.)
Framedragger: (well, the scheme as proposed does use a particular hashing func (sha256), so that part is contestable i suppose.)
Framedragger: in P, alf wants to have hashing func etc be defined within the key itself. but maybe all that is not relevant for the purposes of a universal fingerprint scheme.
Framedragger: quite! i'd say it's flexible and elegant (in terms of minimal complexity) enough
Framedragger: imho hash format makes sense - it's just modulus and arbitrary 'user' field. dunno if it's still wanted to just have e,N,comment but if so, comment could be userstring in terms of mapping fingerprints to new rsa format.
Framedragger: (so, hash of modulus and concat(userstring, "; ") it seems)
Framedragger: ben_vulpes what mp said; yeah it's useful, but knowable-beforehand
http endpoint has its merits :)
Framedragger: i mean, a way to request full public key, with some stable/deterministic permalink url format.
Framedragger: is there a tmsr keyserver, in the sense of one being able to link to a gpg fingerprint known to WoT, as a permalink?
Framedragger: (and don't use 'adopted storage' in android in the future. it's stupid.)
Framedragger: mircea_popescu are you referring to the time-honoured "put some irc logs into deedbot" practice? :D (that i'd seen)
Framedragger: unrelated; such heavy reliance on archive.is by qntra, irc forum et al. scares me. it seems to be doing ~fine and i like the owner's attitude (
http://archive.is/faq), but 'someone' should make another one
Framedragger: (maybe because the guy played is insuffeable, too..)
Framedragger: nice free association: there's a pretty lulzy but cool film called colour me kubrick. based on tru st0ry in which this almost-homeless alcoholic guy pretends to be kubrick thereby gaining respect, deals, fancy restaurant dining etc. played my malkovich, and it somehow works for me.
Framedragger: aha! still funny when it's done so transparently hm
Framedragger: (ahh, maybe the key *isn't* on the card.. which makes it slightly less retarted; slightly)
Framedragger: google aliased dmcrypt to $some_internal_serious_sounding_android_keyword and moved things around...
Framedragger: but it seems that the encryption key is (of course) found on the card itself (one can just dd...), in a weird 'meta' part. it's just aes 128 bit. sek00rity
Framedragger: i don't suppose anyone here has messed with android 'adopted' storage? (use sd card as internal encrypted android storage.) i'm trying to recover files from a half-broken 32GB sd card which has weirdo android-internal partitions and encryption.. oh god
☟︎ Framedragger: if i'd known that there'd be so many pops, i wouldn't have plastered my nym on all those gpg keys >.< this *is* a bit spammy...
☟︎ Framedragger: but sometimes one may indulge and do the whole suspension of disbelief thing :) but yes, quite, hm
Framedragger: certainly noted! assumed as much :) includes increased pessimism for funding OS projects (such as openbsd) etc i guess...
Framedragger: << "The U.S. government quietly began requesting that select foreign visitors provide their Facebook, Twitter and other social media accounts upon arriving in the country"
Framedragger: (mp suggested to invite him over, and here i am childishly fearing that he'll hate this place, mp will decide that he's not mp-complete/ready, and that's gonna be that. i know, sad.)
☟︎